Ouhssou Youssef and Fallous Ali / Verbal and gender conflict
144
qui, dans l’esprit de la théorie de l’évolution, est indispensable), ou, tout au moins, pour
qu’elle ne lui soit pas nuisible, il faut qu’elle soit appropriée au monde dans lequel il vit,
ou, en d’autres termes, qu’elle soit vraie. » (Reboul & Moeschler, 1998, p. 82) The first
sign-processing system is the brain, and the cognitive process is then a significant phase
in the interpretation, consisting the link with cognition as its central unit. To understand
how humans’ function, we need to know how they act and react in different situations
from the moment of birth. Indeed, when it comes to their interactions with other species,
humans are uniform. However, there is no exact similarity among them, and when
similarities do exist, they are merely a natural outcome and not something noteworthy.
The concept of herds in sociology emphasizes the ideological construction of
groups, as does the notion of manipulation in communication science. Pragmatics, as a
science is concerned with the use of signs, communicating and with using one sign in
relation to another,which reveals intentions and helps to construct conversational
meaning. Having developed an entire theory of relevance, Sperber and Wilson have
brought to light a conciderable notion, the one emphasizing that representation is the
key for interpretation and thought. On this scale, every human discovers the world from
the day of his existence via the five senses (gustatory, uditory, olfactory, visual and
tactile), which allows the accumulation of an infinit number of representations
constituting one’s thought and truth. Consequently, social interactants when interacting
with each other, encode and decode the sound form, written or drawn according to the
data and representations previously affirmed as true premises while trying to change
the representations to each other so that he has resemblance.
The evaluation of representation
«Si le but d’un système cognitif est de se construire une représentation du monde
et si cette représentation du monde doit être appropriée, c’est-à-dire si el doit
représenter correctement des faits qui existent dans le monde, la question qui se pose
est celle de son évaluation. » (Reboul & Moeschler, 1998, p. 83). The two evaluative
terms of a representation are truth and fallacy; however, individuals while interacting
with each other must implement the appropriate evaluative process to ensure the right
conclusion, whether it is true or false. In the first instance, for the inter-actants to be
able to interact, it is essential that to use the same format. First of all, they must use a
language the language format which is the same human language and the same
language (French, English, etc.).
Secondly, the realization of the representation in the real world must be verified.
The famous example is that of the leopard: A1 = there is a leopard in the cave # A2 =
there is no leopard in the cave, both representations require the truth of one, which is
why the actual verification of the cave is of prime importance. In addition to the language
format, another factor of equal relevance is the ideological format or referential ideology
of information processing at the mental level. If A1 stages the ideological format of
Islam, while A2 relies on the referential ideology of nihilism or atheism, this will render