© The Authors, 2024, Published by the Universidad del Zulia*Corresponding author:galcivar4312@utm.edu.ec
Keywords:
Sweet potato
Cookies
Ipomoea batatas
Texture prole
Tubers
Partial substitution of wheat our with orange sweet potato our (Ipomoea batatas) and its
eect on the bromatological and sensory properties of sweet cookies
Sustitución parcial de harina de trigo por harina de camote naranja (Ipomoea batatas) y su efecto en
las propiedades bromatológicas y sensoriales de galletas dulces
Substituição parcial da farinha de trigo pela farinha de batata doce de laranja (Ipomoea batatas) e
seu efeito nas propriedades bromatológicas e sensoriais de biscoitos doces
Gema Monserrate Alcívar Zambrano
*
Gilda Jamileth Loor Flecher
José Patricio Muñoz Murillo
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024, 41(3): e244125
ISSN 2477-9407
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47280/RevFacAgron(LUZ).v41.n3.05
Food technology
Associate editor: Dra. Gretty R. Ettiene Rojas
University of Zulia, Faculty of Agronomy
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Departamento de Procesos Agroindustriales, Facultad de
Agrociencias, Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Chone,
Ecuador.
Received: 20-05-2024
Accepted: 16-07-2024
Published: 06-08-2024
Abstract
The objective of the research was to evaluate the partial
substitution of wheat our with orange sweet potato our (Ospf)
in the preparation of sweet cookies. A completely randomized
design with a factorial arrangement was applied. The factor under
study corresponded to the concentrations of Ospf (10, 20, and 30
%) plus a control treatment. Bromatological parameters, texture,
and sensory prole were evaluated. The LSD Fisher and Kruskal
Wallis multiple comparison tests were used at 5 % signicance. The
proximate composition of the orange sweet potato our presented
in protein 3.99 ± 0.02 %; moisture 8.65 ± 0.00 %; dry matter 91.34
± 0.06 %; ash 4.24 ± 0.00 %; pH 6.41 ± 0.01; acidity 0.69 ± 0.01 %
and particle size 354 ± 0.02 µm. In the processed products (sweet
cookies), except for the energy parameter, the other bromatological
variables presented statistical signicance (p<0.05). Regarding the
texture prole, the parameters hardness, brittleness, and adhesive
force were signicantly dierent (p<0.05) between the treatments,
while, for adhesiveness, cohesiveness, gumminess, elasticity, and
chewiness a p>0.05 (no signicant) was obtained. At the sensory
level, the untrained tasters expressed the acceptability of ‘I neither
like it nor dislike it’ in the attributes, avor, smell, texture, and
consistency; however, in color, the formulations with the factor
under study presented greater acceptance. The sweet cookies met
the requirements established in the INEN 2085 reference standard
for cookies.
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024, 41(3): e244125 July-September. ISSN 2477-9407.
2-7 |
Resumen
La investigación tuvo como objetivo evaluar la sustitución
parcial de harina de trigo por harina de camote naranja (Hcn) en la
elaboración de galletas dulces. Se aplicó un diseño completamente
al azar con arreglo factorial. El factor en estudio correspondió a las
concentraciones de Hcn (10, 20 y 30 %) más un tratamiento testigo. Se
evaluaron parámetros bromatológicos, perl de textura y sensorial. Se
emplearon las pruebas de comparación múltiple LSD Fisher y Kruskal
Wallis al 5 % de signicancia. La composición proximal de la harina
de camote naranja presentó en proteína 3,99 ± 0,02 %; humedad 8,65
± 0,00 %; materia seca 91,34 ± 0,06 %; ceniza 4,24 ± 0,00 %; pH 6,41
± 0,01; acidez 0,69 ± 0,01 % y tamaño de partícula 354 ± 0,02 µm. En
los productos elaborados (galletas dulces), a excepción del parámetro
energía, las demás variables bromatológicas presentaron signicancia
estadística (p<0,05). En cuanto al perl de textura, los parámetros
dureza, fragilidad y fuerza adhesiva fueron signicativamente
diferentes (p<0,05) entre los tratamientos, mientras que, para la
adhesividad, cohesividad, gomosidad, elasticidad y masticabilidad se
obtuvo un p>0,05 (no signicativo). A nivel sensorial, los catadores
no entrenados, manifestaron una aceptabilidad de ni me gusta ni
me disgusta en los atributos, sabor, olor, textura y consistencia, sin
embargo, en color, las formulaciones con factor en estudio presentaron
mayor aceptación. Las galletas dulces cumplieron con los requisitos
establecidos en la norma de referencia INEN 2085 para galletas.
Palabras clave: camote, galletas, Ipomoea batatas, perl de textura,
tubérculos.
Resumo
O objetivo da pesquisa foi avaliar a substituição parcial da farinha
de trigo pela farinha de batata doce de laranja (Hcn) no preparo de
biscoitos doces. Foi aplicado delineamento inteiramente casualizado
com arranjo fatorial. O fator em estudo correspondeu às concentrações
de Hcn (10, 20 e 30 %) mais um tratamento controle. Foram avaliados
parâmetros bromatológicos, textura e perl sensorial. Foram utilizados
os testes de comparações múltiplas LSD Fisher e Kruskal Wallis,
com nível de signicância de 5 %. A composição proximal da farinha
de batata doce com laranja apresentou 3,99 ± 0,02 % de proteína;
umidade 8,65 ± 0,00 %; matéria seca 91,34 ± 0,06 %; cinzas 4,24 ±
0,00 %; pH 6,41 ± 0,01; acidez 0,69 ± 0,01 % e tamanho de partícula
354 ± 0,02 µm. Nos produtos industrializados (biscoitos doces), com
exceção do parâmetro energia, as demais variáveis bromatológicas
apresentaram signicância estatística (p<0,05). Quanto ao perl
de textura, os parâmetros dureza, fragilidade e força adesiva
foram signicativamente diferentes (p<0,05) entre os tratamentos,
enquanto, para adesividade, coesividade, gomosidade, elasticidade e
mastigabilidade foi obtido p>05 (não signicativo). A nível sensorial,
os provadores não treinados expressaram aceitabilidade de nem gosto
nem desgosto nos atributos, sabor, cheiro, textura e consistência,
porém, na cor, as formulações com o fator em estudo apresentaram
maior aceitação; Os biscoitos doces atenderam aos requisitos
estabelecidos na norma de referência INEN 2085 para biscoitos.
Palavras-chave: batata doce, biscoitos, Ipomoea batatas, perl de
textura, tubérculos.
Introduction
Cookies are among the foods of mass consumption with low
nutritional contribution for the consumer, however, over the years
they have gained demand in their consumption by all age groups
thanks to their easy aordability, storage, and transport (Arcaya
Moncada et al., 2020). These types of products, besides having a long
shelf life are ideal for including unconventional ours/powders in
their formulation to improve their nutritional content, thus providing
a healthier food option to the consumer. In this regard, Ahmed et
al. (2021) indicated that 40 % of barley meal generates up to 12 %
antioxidant activity, and according to Ramya and Ashwini (2020),
pumpkin our provides 36.80 μg.100 g
-1
total carotene (on a dry
basis) for cookies.
On the other hand, Colina et al. (2016) point out that there is
a great scientic contribution in the cookie industry, however, it is
necessary to include native raw materials such as tubers (foods rich
in antioxidants, bers, vitamins) which, through agro-industrial
transformation into our, can reduce production costs (considerably
reducing the import of wheat) in the manufacture of cookies.
Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) is a tuber that belongs to the
family Convolvulaceae (Barkessa, 2018), and it is grown worldwide
in diverse environments, often by smallholder farmers on marginal
soils, using few inputs (Adeyeye et al., 2016). More than 105 million
metric tons are produced annually in the world, and more than 95
% of this amount in developing countries (Vásquez et al., 2019). In
Ecuador, its production and consumption are concentrated in the rural
sectors of the Coast, Sierra, and Amazon, grouped according to the
color of the pulp: orange, yellow, white, and purple (Armijos et al.,
2020). In the province of Manabí, sweet potato roots are cultivated in
about 396 ha approximately, which produced 1266 t.year
-1
in 2008,
reecting a productivity of 3.19 t.ha
-1
(Motato Alarcon et al., 2016).
Dietary ber, carbohydrates, vitamin A (as β-carotene), vitamin
B6, vitamin C, copper, manganese, potassium, and iron are found
in the tuber of I. batatas (Mohammed et al., 2021). Additionally,
it has anticancer, cardiovascular, anti-inammatory, antitumor,
antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties, which protect against
neuronal degeneration, liver damage from alcoholic beverages, and
kidney failure (Carrera et al., 2021).
Indeed, sweet potato has a variety of bioactive compounds
of importance for human health, however, this raw material is an
Andean crop that over time in Ecuador has been relegated by other
more protable ones or, in turn, due to the lack of knowledge of its
nutritional components, functional and physicochemical properties,
and, therefore, of its use and potential applications in the food industry
(Salazar et al., 2021). According to the above, in this study, the partial
substitution of wheat our for orange sweet potato our and its eect
on the bromatological and sensory properties of sweet potato cookies
was evaluated.
Materials and methods
Trial location
The process of making sweet potato our and cookies was
developed in the Laboratory of Agroindustrial Processes, in the area
of fruits/vegetables and grains/cereals of the Faculty of Agrosciences,
Technical University of Manabí, Ecuador.
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Alcívar et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024 41(3): e244125
3-7 |
The physicochemical, bromatological, and microbiological
analyses of the our and the processed product (sweet cookies)
were carried out in the biochemistry, bromatology and microbiology
laboratories of the Faculty of Agrosciences of the Technical University
of Manabí.
Raw materials
For the development of the research, the orange variety sweet
potato grown in the province of Imbabura – Ecuador (Agrícola
Arenas commercial brand) was used. The inputs (wheat our, sugar,
butter, baking powder, ground cinnamon, salt, and vanilla essence)
required for the cookie-making process were purchased at the local
Akí supermarket in the Chone canton in the province of Manabí.
Obtaining orange sweet potato our
Orange sweet potato tubers were received, which did not
present mechanical damage or the presence of fungi. Then the raw
material was washed with a sodium hypochlorite solution at 20 ppm,
subsequently, the respective removal of the peel was continued with
a stainless steel knife.
The sweet potato was laminated using a stainless steel mandoline,
which was used to obtain slices approximately 0.5 cm wide, which
were dehydrated at a temperature of 50 °C for 24 hours in a dehydrator
(BYR brand) with a capacity of 12 stainless steel trays.
Subsequently, the dehydrated sweet potato slices were milled in
an electric mill (with stainless steel blades) for 30 minutes, and the
sweet potato our was continuously sieved in a No. 45 metal mesh
sieve to obtain a particle size of 354 µm, and then the experimental
material was packaged in vacuum-sealed double-sealed polyethylene
plastic bags. The samples were stored at a temperature of 28 °C.
Production of sweet cookies
The reception of orange sweet potato our, wheat, and other
ingredients was carried out, subsequently, the respective weighing of
raw materials and inputs established in table 1 was made. For each
treatment under study, an experimental unit of 500 g of mixture was
obtained for the production of sweet cookies.
The mixture of wet ingredients (butter and vanilla essence) was
carried out using a hand mixer (Oster 5V 2499-013 240W brand)
for two minutes, then the other dry ingredients (sugar, salt, baking
powder, ground cinnamon) were added, it continued mixing for one
minute, wheat our and sweet potato our were added to the base
mixture. Subsequently, manual kneading was carried out for 10
minutes until a homogeneous dough was obtained, and it was left to
rest for 5 minutes. The molding of the cookie dough continued, for this
process a lamination of the dough was made using a wooden roller,
followed by molds of gures (rectangular, star, circular, square) of
stainless steel, each treatment under study was molded and identied.
The cookies were baked in a baking oven at a temperature of
120 °C for 12 minutes. They were then allowed to cool to room
temperature, packed in vacuum-sealed polyethylene bags, and stored
at a temperature of 28 °C.
Physicochemical and microbiological properties of orange
sweet potato our
For the physicochemical and microbiological analyses in sweet
potato our, the INEN 616:2015 Ecuadorian standard was taken as a
reference, the following parameters established in the standard were
evaluated: protein (6.24) (NTE INEN-ISO 20483), moisture and dry
matter (NTE INEN-ISO 712), ash (NTE INEN-ISO 2171), pH (10
%) (NTE INEN-ISO 1842), acidity percentage of sulfuric acid (NTE
INEN 521), particle size (NTE INEN 517:2013), E. coli (ISO 16649-
1:2019), molds and yeasts (NTE INEN 1529-10).
Bromatological analysis and pH determination in sweet
cookies
For the bromatological analysis of sweet cookies, the parameters
established in the INEN 2085:2005 standard for cookies were
considered, being the following; protein (6.25) (NTE INEN-ISO
20483), moisture and dry matter by the test method (NTE INEN-ISO
712), ash (NTE INEN-ISO 2171), fat (AOAC 2003.06), crude ber
(AOAC 962.09), nitrogen-free extract (proximal calculation), energy
(calculation) and pH (potentiometric).
Texture prole analysis in sweet cookies
The texture prole analysis was performed using a texturometer
(Shimadzu Universal Tester EZTest EZ-LX) which was applied to all
experimental formulations. The variables analyzed were; hardness (N
= Newtons), brittleness (N = Newtons), adhesiveness (J = Joules),
cohesiveness, adhesive force (N = Newtons), gumminess (N =
Newtons), elasticity and chewiness (N = Newtons).
Sensory analysis in sweet cookies
The sensory acceptability of the cookies was evaluated by a panel
of 90 untrained judges, who were provided with a hedonic test with
a scale of seven (7) points, with 1 being the lowest acceptance and 7
being the highest acceptance (1 = I dislike it a lot, 2 = I moderately
Table 1. Formulation of the treatments under study for sweet cookies.
Raw materials
and inputs
Treatments
T0
0 % Ospf
T1
10 % Ospf
T2
20 % Ospf
T3
30 %Ospf
% g % g % g % g
Wheat our
50.0 250.0 40.0 200.0 30.0 150.0 20.0 100.0
Sweet potato
our
0.00 0.00 10.0 50.0 20.0 100.0 30.0 150.0
Sugar
27.0 135.0 27.0 135.0 27.0 135.0 27.0 135.0
Butter
22.0 110.0 22.0 110.0 22.0 110.0 22.0 110.0
Baking powder
0.4 2.0 0.4 2.0 0.4 2.0 0.4 2.0
Ground
cinnamon
0.2 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.2 1.0
Salt
0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5
Vanilla essence
0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5 0.3 1.5
Total
100.0 500.0 100.0 500.0 100.0 500.0 100.0 500.0
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024, 41(3): e244125 July-September. ISSN 2477-9407.
4-7 |
dislike it, 3 = I slightly dislike it, 4 = I neither like nor dislike it, 5 = I
slightly like it, 6 = I moderately like it, 7 = I like it a lot) taste, smell,
color, texture and consistency.
Experimental design and statistical analysis
In the proposed study, a CRD (completely randomized design)
was applied with a factorial arrangement, the factor under study
corresponded to the concentrations of orange sweet potato our at 10,
20 and 30 %, four treatments were formulated, including a control,
with three replicates, respectively, obtaining a total of 12 experimental
units (table 2).
Table 2. Treatments under study from the experimental design.
Treatments Codes % Orange sweet potato
our (Ospf)
Replicates
1
T
0
0 3
2
T
1
10 3
3
S
2
20 3
4
S
3
30 3
For data processing, the InfoStat statistical software version 2020
was used. For the bromatological data of the cookies, an analysis of
variance and Fishers least signicant dierence (LSD) method for
multiple comparisons at 95 % condence and 5 % signicance were
applied. In the case of sensory panel data, non-parametric ANOVA
and Kruskal Wallis tests were used at 95 % condence and 5 %
signicance. Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
Results and discussion
Physicochemical and microbiological properties in orange
sweet potato our
Table 3 presents the results of the physicochemical and
microbiological properties of orange sweet potato our.
Table 3. Physicochemical composition and microbiological count
in orange sweet potato our (Ospf).
Physicochemical parameters Results
Protein (%) 3.99 ± 0.02
Moisture (%) 8.65 ± 0.00
Dry matter (%) 91.34 ± 0.06
Ash (%) 4.24 ± 0.00
pH (10%) 6.41 ± 0.01
Acidity (%) 0.69 ± 0.01
Particle Size (μm) 354 ± 0.02
Microbiological parameters Microorganism count
E. coli (CFU.g
-1
) 0
Molds and Yeasts (UP.g
-1
) 1.39 x 10
The protein content of orange sweet potato our was 3.99 ± 0.02
%, this result is lower than that required in the INEN 616 reference
standard (2015), which indicates that ours for cookies must have a
minimum of 7 % protein, particularly, this parameter is controlled
when the our to be used in the production of cookies is the main
component, in this study, I. sweet potato our is used as a partial
substitution for wheat our, however, it is important to verify the
protein content that vegetable ours can contribute to the nal product.
On the other hand, the moisture presented a value of 8.65 ± 0.00 %, a
result that is within the maximum limit of 14.5 % moisture required
by the INEN 616 reference standard (2015) for ours intended for the
cookie industry.
Concerning dry matter (DM), a value of 91.34 ± 0.06 % was
obtained for orange sweet potato our. According to Sebben et al.
(2016), DM values can vary depending on the tuber genotype, in their
study they presented results of 100.0 % DM in orange-eshed sweet
potato our.
For the ash parameter, a content of 4.24 ± 0.00 % was obtained,
this value is higher than that required in the INEN 616 Ecuadorian
standard (2015), which establishes a maximum of 0.8 %, the ash
content can increase in tuber ours due to their high concentration
of minerals.
Orange sweet potato our had a pH value of 6.41 ± 0.01 and
acidity of 0.69 ± 0.01 %, higher than that established in the INEN 616
Ecuadorian standard (2015) which requires a limit of 0.2 % acidity
for ours intended for cookie products. Tortoe et al. (2017) reported
a pH between 5.8 6.2 (slightly acidic) and acidity values between
0.50 – 0.84 % in 12 varieties of sweet potato our.
The particle size of sweet potato our is 354 ± 0.02 μm, this
parameter varies according to the type of sieve used when sieving the
vegetable our.
Regarding the count of microorganisms, the our complied with
the limits required in the INEN 616 standard (2015) which establishes
a maximum of 1 x 10
4
CFU.g
-1
for molds and yeasts, while for E. coli
a minimum of <10 CFU.g
-1
is required.
Bromatological analysis and pH of sweet cookies
Table 4 shows the analysis of variance applied to the bromatological
properties and pH of sweet cookies with orange sweet potato our.
With the exception of the energy parameter, the other variables
were statistically signicant (p<0.05 %).
The protein value of sweet cookies with orange sweet potato our
presented signicant results, it was determined that the treatment with
the highest protein content was T0 with 8.89 ± 0.01 % and the lowest
value was T3 (30 % Ospf) with 6.70 ± 0.01 %, this meant that as the
partial substitution of wheat our for sweet potato our increases,
protein levels decrease considerably, probably because tubers such as
sweet potatoes have a lower protein content than cereals, however, all
treatments were found to be higher than the minimum limit of 3.0 %
established by the INEN 2085 standard (2005) for cookies.
The experimental formulations had a moisture content between
7.73 ± 0.16 6.95 ± 0.16 %, with the T3 treatment being lower (30
% Ospf). All values were within the limit required in the INEN 2085
reference standard (2005) for cookies, which indicates a maximum
of 10 % moisture. Regarding ash content, sweet cookies had a value
of 1.55 ± 0.01 % for T0, 1.65 ± 0.01 % (T1), 1.88 ± 0.01 % (T2),
and 1.93 ± 0.01 % (T3), this parameter increased as wheat our was
partially substituted by sweet potato our. According to Temesgen
et al. (2015), the increase in ash in cookies may be due to the high
amounts of minerals present in compound ours (sweet potato/wheat).
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Alcívar et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024 41(3): e244125
5-7 |
Table 4. Results of bromatological analysis and pH of sweet cookies.
Bromatological
parameters
Treatments under study
Sig. LSD
T0
0 % Ospf
T1
10 % Ospf
T2
20 % Ospf
T3
30 % Ospf
Protein (%)
8.89±0.01
a
8.27±0.01
b
7.12±0.01
c
6.70±0.01
d
0.0001
Moisture (%)
7.73±0.16
a
7.08±0.16
b
7.03±0.16
b
6.95±0.16
b
0.0272
Ash (%)
1.55±0.01
a
1.65±0.01
b
1.88±0.01
c
1.93±0.01
d
0.0001
Dry matter (%)
92.26±0.16
a
92.96±0.16
b
92.91±0.16
b
93.04±0.16
b
0.0275
Fat (%)
18.33±0.04
a
18.52±0.04
b
19.06±0.04
c
20.89±0.04
d
0.0001
Crude ber (%)
6.97±0.56
a
7.87±0.56
ab
8.47±0.56
ab
9.13±0.56
b
0.0115
NFE (%)
56.51±0.60
a
56.63±0.60
a
56.35±0.60
a
53.38±0.60
b
0.0059
Energy (kcal.g
-1
)
4.26±0.03
a
4.26±0.03
a
4.25±0.03
a
4.32±0.03
a
0.2834
pH
6.19±0.01
a
6.00±0.01
b
6.19±0.01
a
6.01±0.01
b
0.0001
Results of parametric analysis of variance and Fisher’s LSD mean comparison test. Means that do not share a letter in superscripts are signicantly dierent. NFE:
Nitrogen-free extract.
The dry matter results for the sweet cookies varied between
92.26 ± 0.16 % for T0, which was considered the formulation with
the lowest DM value, however, in the T3 treatment a higher value
of 93.04 ± 0.16 % was determined. Lower values (88.27 ± 1.65 %)
were reported by Cerón Cárdenas et al. (2014), for cookies with 50 %
potato our in formula.
For the fat variable, a value of 18.33 ± 0.4 % was determined
for the T0 treatment (0 % Ospf), while the formulation with the
highest fat content was T3 with 20.89 ± 0.04 %. Namrata Ankush and
Bhagwan Kashiram (2021) obtained a fat variation between 21.73 ±
0.06 and 16.85 ± 0.04 % in the formulation of gluten-free cookies
with orange sweet potato our.
The results for crude ber showed that adding up to 30 % of sweet
potato our in partial substitution of wheat our increases the value
to 9.13 ± 0.56 % for this nutritionally important compound, while
the control cookie presented the lowest crude ber value of 6.97 ±
0.56 %. According to Florence et al. (2020), crude ber helps reduce
the risk of constipation, it also serves as a functional ingredient that
protects against cardiovascular disease.
The nitrogen-free extract was similar for the T0, T1, and T2
treatments whose values are (56.51 ± 0.60, 56.63 ± 0.60, and 56.35
± 0.60 %). As for the treatment T3 was considered to have the lowest
value of NFE in sweet cookies, that is, when adding 30 % of sweet
potato our, the levels of NFE decreased in the experimental product.
Mohammad et al. (2018) in their study of cookies with sorbitol
obtained results of 64.99 % in NFE.
Regarding the pH in the sweet cookies, there was a variation
between 6.00 ± 0.01 6.19, ± 0.01, results that are within the range
established by the INEN 2085 standard (2005) which establishes a
minimum of 5.5 and a maximum of 9.5.
Texture prole analysis in sweet cookies
Table 5 shows the results of the analysis of variance obtained in the
texture prole properties for sweet cookies. The variables hardness,
brittleness, and adhesive force were statistically signicant (p<0.05),
however, adhesiveness, cohesiveness, gumminess, elasticity, and
chewiness were not signicantly dierent (p>0.05).
Table 5. Texture prole parameters in sweet cookies.
Prole
texture
Treatments under study
Sig.
LSD
T0
0 % Ospf
T1
10 % Ospf
T2
20 % Ospf
T3
30 % Ospf
Hardness (N)
408.33±41.70
a
336.26±41.70
ab
302.74±41.70
ab
242.78±41.7
b
0.0130
Brittleness (N)
131.02±52.67
a
91.07±52.67
b
32.72±52.67
c
49.38±52.67
c
0.0001
Adhesiveness (J)
-0.05±0.10
a
-0.22±0.10
a
-0.01±0.10
a
-0.01±0.10
a
0.4726
Cohesiveness
3.5±2.9
a
3.8±2.9
a
4.3±2.9
a
1.42±2.9
a
0.7432
A-Force (N)
-2.29±1.58
ab
-1.77±1.58
b
-1.77±1.58
ab
-0.43±1.58
a
0.0479
Gumminess (N)
1.25±1.10
a
1.31±1.10
a
1.23±1.10
a
1.23±1.10
a
0.9999
Elasticity
0.01±0.03
a
0.05±0.03
a
0.01±0.03
a
0.01±0.03
a
0.6134
Chewiness (N)
0.02±0.10
a
0.20±0.10
a
0.03±0.10
a
0.03±0.10
a
0.5658
Results of parametric analysis of variance and Fishers LSD mean comparison test. Means that do not share a letter in superscripts are
signicantly dierent. A-Force: Adhesive force.
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024, 41(3): e244125 July-September. ISSN 2477-9407.
6-7 |
The hardness of the sweet cookies was higher in the T0
treatment (0 % Ospf) with a value of 408.33 ± 41.70 N, however,
the incorporation of sweet potato our decreased the hardness values
for the other treatments, T1: 336.26 ± 41.70 N; T2: 302.74 ± 41.70
N and to a lesser extent T3 (30 % Ospf) with 242.78 ± 41.70 N.
The cookies with the factor under study had a lower hardness than
the control treatment, probably because sweet potato our has low
levels of proteins, which play an important role in the hardness of
the cookies. Kudadam Korese et al. (2021) reported hardness values
between 1,801 and 8,879 kg in cookies composed of unpeeled orange
sweet potato our, according to the authors, variations in hardness
may be subject to changes in the internal structure of the cookies that
can be attributed to chemical and functional characteristics.
Sweet potato our cookies in formula presented lower values
in brittleness between 32.72 ± 52.67 N - 91.07 ± 52.67 N, as they
presented lower newton force indicating a greater risk of brittleness,
however, the T0 treatment presented a higher value (131.02 ± 52.67
N), which indicates that the 100 % wheat our cookie is less prone to
brittleness. According to Sayem et al. (2024), variations in brittleness
may be due to changes in the dough’s structural integrity and crumb
characteristics.
The adhesive force was higher in the 100 % wheat our cookies
with a value of -2.29 ± 1.58 N, this characteristic decreased to -1.77 ±
1.58 N for T1 and T2, while, in a lower value, it was the formulation
30 % orange sweet potato our with -0.43 ± 1.58 N. These results are
lower than those published by Quoc Dat and Hong Phuong (2017)
who obtained an adhesive value of 6.00 ± 0.35 N.s in cookies with
coconut our.
Sensory analysis in sweet cookies
Table 6 shows the results of the non-parametric analysis of
variance.
It was established that the factor under study (Ospf) did not
signicantly inuence (p>0.05) the sensory response attributes:
taste, smell, texture, and consistency, however, the color attribute did
present statistical signicance (p<0.05).
Due to the fact that the color attribute presented statistical
signicance, the comparison of means was made according to the
Kruskal Wallis test, it was determined that the T0 treatment presented
the lowest acceptance with a score of 4.98 ± 1.53 and category of
‘I neither like nor dislike it’’, while the other treatments with sweet
potato our presented an acceptability of ‘I slightly like it’ with scores
between 5.30 ± 1.43 – 5.57 ± 1.32, the T1 formulation being the most
accepted by untrained tasters. According to Olajumoke Olomyo et al.
(2021), Ospf presents in its composition about 18.83 ± 0.2 mg.100
-1
g in β-Carotenes, which are responsible for the orange pigmentation
in the tuber, these pigments are present in the formulation of cookies,
favoring the color acceptability of the experimental product.
Table 6. Sensory acceptability in sweet cookies.
Sensory attributes Treatments under study Sig.
K.W.
T0
0 % Ospf
T1
10 % Ospf
T2
20 % Ospf
T3
30 % Ospf
Taste
5.66±1.39
a
5.67±1.54
a
5.83±1.06
a
5.66±1.49
a
0.9681
Smell
5.13±1.46
a
5.57±1.32ª 5.49±1.18
a
5.30±1.43
a
0.2293
Color
4.98±1.53ª 5.60±1.50
b
5.63±1.17
b
5.76±1.24
b
0.0012
Texture
5.09±1.57
a
5.27±1.57
a
5.62±1.04
a
5.27±1.57
a
0.2993
Consistency
5.36±1.30
a
5.60±1.66
a
5.69±1.44
a
5.46±1.64
a
0.0998
Results of non-parametric analysis and Kruskal Wallis test. Means that do not share a letter in superscripts are signicantly dierent..
Conclusions
The physicochemical properties of orange sweet potato our did
not meet the standards required in the INEN 616 reference standard,
however, the moisture and the count of microorganisms (E. coli,
molds, and yeasts) were within the limits allowed by the standard.
The experimental formulations complied with the bromatological
requirements established in the INEN 2085 Ecuadorian technical
standard (2005), however, it was determined that by adding 30%
orange sweet potato our, crude ber levels increased considerably
in the sweet cookies.
The texture prole analysis determined similar values in the sweet
cookies between the treatments for the properties of adhesiveness,
cohesiveness, gumminess, elasticity and chewiness, however, in
terms of hardness, brittleness, and adhesive force, the T0 treatment
presented better characteristics at the level of texture.
The untrained tasters expressed an acceptance of ‘I neither like
nor dislike it’ for the attributes taste, smell, texture, and consistency,
however, at the color level, the cookies with orange sweet potato
our generated a greater acceptability of ‘I slightly like it’ by the
panelists.
Literature cited
Adeyeye, A., Akanbi, W., Sobola, O., Lamidi, W., & Olalekan, K. (2016).
Comparative eect of organic and inorganic fertilizer treatment on the
growth and tuberyeild of sweet potato (Ipomoea batata L). International
Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, 3(3), 54-57. Doi:10.18488/
journal.70/2016.3.3/70.3.54.57
Ahmed, A., Fadl, E.D., Afna, A., Ahmed, Alia, A., Hussain, A., & Abdulmajeed,
A. (2021). Addition of whole barley our as a partial substitute of wheat
our to enhance the nutritional value of biscuits. Arabian Journal of
Chemistry, 14(1), 1-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103112
Arcaya, Moncada, M.J., García Arías, G.F., Coras Bendezύ, D.M., Chávez
Camacho, C.V., Poquioma, Urguía, G., & Quispe Díaz, B.M. (2020).
Efecto de la ingesta de galletas forticadas con sangre bovina en
hemoglobina de niños anémicos. Revista Cubana de Enfermería, 36(3),
1-11. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-
03192020000300010&lng=es&tlng=es.
Armijos, G., Villacrés, E., Quelal, M., Cobeña, G., & Álvarez, J. (2020). Evaluación
físico-química y funcional de siete variedades de camote provenientes de
Manabí-Ecuador. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Postcosecha,
21(2), 1-12. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=81365122009
Barkessa, M. (2018). A Review on Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) viruses and
associated diseases. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and
Forestry, 5 (9), 1-10. https://agshare.today/RC/a-review-on-sweet-
potato-ipomea-batatas-viruses-and-associated-diseases/
Carrera, C., Zelaya-Medina, C., Chinchilla, N., Ferreiro-González, M., Barbero,
G., & Palma, M. (2021). How dierent cooking methods aect the
phenolic composition of sweet potato for human consumption (Ipomoea
batata L.) Lam). Agronomy, 11(8). Doi:10.3390/agronomy11081636
Cerón Cardenas, A.F., Bucheli Jurado, M.A., & Osorio Mora, O. (2014).
Elaboración de galletas a base de harina de papa de la variedad parda
pastusa (Solanum tuberosum L.). Acta Agronómica, 63(2), 101-109. Doi.
org/10.15446/acag.v63n2.39575
This scientic publication in digital format is a continuation of the Printed Review: Legal Deposit pp 196802ZU42, ISSN 0378-7818.
Alcívar et al. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 2024 41(3): e244125
7-7 |
Colina, R., Laguado, N., & Faneite, A. (2016). Evaluation of cookies made
with sundried cassava our (Manihot esculenta Crantz) as a substitute
for wheat. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (LUZ), 33(3), 358-
374. https://produccioncienticaluz.org/index.php/agronomia/article/
view/27202
Florence, B., Etoro-Obong, A., & Ntukidem, V. (2020). Development and quality
characteristics of cookies from sprouted sorghum, pigeon pea and orange
eshed sweet potato our blends. European Journal of Nutrition & Food
Safety, 12(2), 11-21. Doi:10.9734/EJNFS/2020/v12i230189
INEN 616. (2015). Harina de trigo. Requisitos. https://docplayer.es/32084179-
Nte-inen-616-cuarta-revision.html
INEN 2085. (2005). Galletas requisitos. chrome-extension://
efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclendmkaj/https://ia804701.us.archive.org/13/
items/ec.nte.2085.2005/ec.nte.2085.2005.pdf
Kudadam Korese, J., Ko Chikpah, S., Elke Pawelzik, O., & Sturm, B. (2021).
Eect of orange-eshed sweet potato our particle size and degree of
wheat our substitution on physical, nutritional, textural and sensory
properties of cookies. European Food Research and Technology, 247,
889–905. Doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03672-z
Mohammad, A., Majid, M., Muhammad, A., Muhammad, U., Mohammad, F &
Pigorev, I. (2018). Eect of sorbitol on dough rheology and quality of
sugar replaced cookies. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences,
12(1), 50 - 56. Doi.org/10.5219/709
Mohammed, H., Aftab, A., Abuzer, A., Ahmed, F., Prawez, A., Sultan, A.,
Mohammed, G & Faiyaz, S. (2021). A greener HPTLC approach for the
determination of β-carotene in traditional and ultrasound-based extracts
of dierent fractions of Daucus carota (L.), Ipomoea batatas (L.),
and Commercial Formulation. Agronomy, 11(12), 1-15. Doi:10.3390/
agronomy11122443
Motato Alarcon, N., Cevallos Pinargote, L., Pincay Menendez, J., Anchundia
Betancourt, C., & Anchundia Muentes, M. (2016). Alternativas de siembra
del camote (Ipomoea batatas L.) Para el cantón jaramiijó, provincia de
manabí. Espamciencia, 7(1), 7-14. http://revistasespam.espam.edu.ec/
index.php/Revista_ESPAMCIENCIA/article/view/108
Namrata Ankush , G., & Bhagwan Kashiram , S. (2021). Eects of incorporation
of orange-eshed sweet potato our on physicochemical, nutritional,
functional, microbial, and sensory characteristics of gluten-free cookies.
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 45(4), 1-14. Doi.
org/10.1111/jfpp.15324
Olajumoke Olomyo, R., Olofunmilayo Sade, O., & Olugbenga Olufemi, A. (2021).
Biochemical and antioxidant properties of cream and orange-eshed
sweet potato. Heliyon, 7, 1-7. Doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06533
Quoc Dat, L., & Hong Phuong, V. (2017). Functional properties and inuences of
coconut our on textureof dough and cookies. Vietnam Journal of Science
and Technology, 55, 100-107. Doi:10.15625/2525-2518/55/5A/12184
Ramya, A., & Ashwini, A. (2020). Eect of mixing pumpkin powder with wheat
our on physical, nutritional and sensory characteristics of cookies.
International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(4), 1030-1035. Doi.
org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4g.9737
Salazar, D., Arnacibia, M., Silva, D., López-Caballero, M.E., & Montero, M.P.
(2021). Exploring the potential of andean crops for the production of gluten-
free muns. Agronomy, 11(8), 1-16. Doi:10.3390/agronomy11081642
Sayem, A., Talukder , S., Akter, S., Alam, M., Rana, M., & Alam, M. (2024).
Utilization of fruits and vegetables wastes for the dietary ber enrichment
of biscuits and its quality attributes. Journal of Agriculture and Food
Research, 15, 1-15. Doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101077
Sebben, J., Ferreira Trierweiler, L., & Trierweiler, J. (2016). Orange-eshed sweet
potato our obtained by drying in microwave and hot air. Journal of Food
Processing and Preservation, 41(1), 1-14. Doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12744
Temesgen, L., Abebe, H., & Tigist, F. (2015). Production and quality evaluation of
cookies enriched with β-carotene by blending orange-eshed sweet potato
and wheat ours for alleviation of nutritional insecurity. International
Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering, 5(5), 209-217.
Doi:10.5923/j.food.20150505.05
Tortoe, C., Akonor, P., Koch, K., Menzel, C., & Adofo, K. (2017). Physicochemical
and functional properties of our from twelve varieties of Ghanaian sweet
potatoes. International Food Research Journal, 24(6), 2549-2556. http://
www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/24%20(06)%202017/(37).pdf
Vásquez Hernández, L., Paredes, D., Otero González, J., Tapia, C., & Pabón
Gárcés, G. (2019). Diversidad de morfotipos de camote Ipomoea batatas
(Convolvulaceae), y determinación de áreas óptimas para su conservación
en Ecuador. Revista Cubana de Ciencias Biológicas, 7(1), 1-11. https://
revistas.uh.cu/rccb/article/view/1062