
New butterflies from the Venezuelan Andes 113
(fig. 82, cladogram), 184 (fig.136, distribution), 244; 2010b: 266 (fig. 1I male), 267,
268 (fig. 2, distribution);Viloria, 1998: 10, 11, 13, 141, 142, 144, 146 (tbl. 1),147
(tbl. 2), 150 (fig. 23, male), 158 (fig. 72, wing venation), 170 (fig. 125, male geni-
talia), 320 (last, in part misidentification of other taxa, but fig. 23 correct); 2000:
269, 270; 2002: 190; 2005: 459; Ferrer-Paris, 2000: 27 (fig. 3.1, distribution [in part
misidentifications of R. bolivari and R. chiquinquirana n. sp.]), 29 (tbl. 3.1), 36, 37
(fig. 3.5), 38, 41 (tbl. 3.6), 91-92 (tbl. C.7); Viloria and Pyrcz, 2001: 12, 13; Viloria et
al., 2003: 22 (fig. 1(b) male); Ferrer-Paris and Viloria, [2004]: 627, 628 (fig. 1), 629
(tbl. 1), Lamas et al., 2004: 215.
Redonda empetrus (Thieme); Viloria, 1990: 223; 1998: 126, 176-181 (figs. 151-
157, cladograms), 343, 474 (tbl. 8); 2003: 247, 248 (figs. 1, 2, cladograms); Díaz
et al., 1997: 284, 811; Ferrer-Paris, 2000: x, 17, 30, 31 (fig. 3.2), 32(fig. 3.3), 33, 34
(tbl. 3.2), 35 (tbl. 3.3), 36 (fig. 3.4), 40, 41, 42 (tbl. 3.7), 43 (fig. 3.7), 44 (fig. 3.8), 45
(fig. 3.9), 46 (fig. 3.10), 47 (tbl. 3.8), 66, 69, 78 (fig. A.5, eggs and larvae, fig. A.6),
84 (tbl. C.1), 85-86 (tbl. C.2), 87 (tbl. C.3), 88 (tbl. C.4), 96 (tbl. C.9); Orellana,
2004: 5-57, 5-63, 5-69, 5-70, 5-1; Shou et al., 2006: 105; Viloria et al., 2007: [23];
Pyrcz, 2007a: 40, 41; 2010a: 46, 82, 134, 182, 183; 2010b: 265, 267, 272, 273; Peña,
2009: 102 (figs. 2, cladogram), 103 (fig. 3, cladogram), 105 (fig. 5, cladogram),
107 (fig. 8, cladogram), 111; Bolaños-Martínez et al., 2010: 89; Padrón Martínez,
2010: 19 (fig. 2-1, cladograms A, B), 26 (tbl. 2-1), 84; Peña et al., 2011: 70 (tbl. 1),
80 (fig. 6, cladogram).
[Redonda empetrus bolivari Adams and Bernard; Viloria, 1998: 319; 2000: 270;
Ferrer-Paris, 2000: 27 (fig. 3.1, distribution) (misidentifications, at least in part)].
Redonda empetrus georgei Pyrcz and Viloria, nom. nud.; Pyrcz, 2007b: 18, 19;
2010a:181 (figs. 132C, male; D, female; 133, female), 182, 184 (fig. 136, distribu-
tion), 244; 2010b: 272. Redonda emperatus [sic] (Thieme); Peña, 2009: 104(fig. 4,
cladogram).
Redonda empetrus ssp. 1; Pyrcz, 2010b: 266 (Figs. 1A male, 1B female), 267,
268 (fig. 2, distribution), 270 (fig. 4D, habitat), 271 (figs. 5C, female, 5D, pair in
copula).
Type locality: Herein restricted to the páramos of the upper
Albarregas river (páramo de Los Conejos, pico Campanario, 3100-
4300 m), westernmost extreme of the Serranía de La Culata, north
of the city of Mérida, Mérida State,Venezuela.
Original description, translated into English from Thieme
(1905), by Á.L.V. (diagnostic characters in bold letters):
“Ped. Empetrus n. sp. mine (Tbl. 1, Fig. 7)
A form of Pedaliodes between albonotata Godm. and albomaculata
Weymer, bigger than both, posterior [wing] prolongued, elongated
(as in albomaculata). Fringe of wings all pale white between veins,
anterior entire, posterior barely scalloped. Antennal club thick-
ened, claviform, palps longer than usual, without a scaled area.