https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e34500
Received: 06/08/2024 Accepted: 28/10/2024 Published: 31/12/2024
1 of 11
Revista Científica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34500
ABSTRACT
This study was aimed at determining the effects of wheat gluten,
corn gluten and soybean meal, incorporated into feed as protein
sources, on the hepatic tissue of rats, based on the investigation of
histopathological parameters (degeneration, inammation, biliary
hyperplasia and fat droplets), immunohistochemical parameters
(transglutaminase, gliadin, IgA, IgG, CD4 and CD8), and the serum
levels of hepatic enzymes [(aspartate aminotransferase (AST),
alanine transaminase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH)]. Three groups, referred to as Wheat Group,
Group Corn and Group Soybean, were established, and were given
high levels of wheat gluten, corn gluten and soybean meal as protein
sources in the feed, respectively. The study material comprised
forty–eight 20–day–old female Sprague Dawley rats. In the group,
which received dietary wheat gluten, the hepatic tissue presented
with numerically higher histopathological and immunohistochemical
parameters on day 45 of the study, and numerically higher
histopathological parameters on day 165 of the study (P>0.05). On
day 165 of the study, when compared to Groups Corn and Soybean,
Group Wheat displayed a signicantly different level of sensitivity to
immunohistochemical parameters (transglutaminase, gliadin, IgA, IgG,
CD4 and CD8). It was determined that gluten signicantly reduced the
activity of the liver enzymes LDH and AST. In result, it was ascertained
that rats, not carrying the genes HLA–DQ2 and DQ8, when fed on a
ration incorporated with a high level of wheat gluten, displayed slightly
affected hepatic tissue histopathological parameters and signicantly
increased immunohistochemical parameters (transglutaminase,
gliadin, IgA, IgG, CD4 and CD8).
Key words: Rat; gluten; wheat; corn; immunohistochemical
RESUMEN
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar los efectos del gluten
de trigo, gluten de maíz y harina de soya, incorporados al alimento
como fuentes de proteína, sobre el tejido hepático de ratas, con base
en la investigación de parámetros histopatológicos (degeneración,
inflamación, hiperplasia biliar y gotas de grasa), parámetros
inmunohistoquímicos (transglutaminasa, gliadina, IgA, IgG, CD4
y CD8), y los niveles séricos de enzimas hepáticas [(aspartato
aminotransferasa (AST), alanina transaminasa (ALT), fosfatasa alcalina
(ALP), lactato deshidrogenasa (LDH)]. Se establecieron tres grupos,
denominados Grupo Trigo, Grupo Maíz y Grupo Soja, a los que se les
suministró en el alimento altos niveles de gluten de trigo, gluten de
maíz y harina de soya como fuentes de proteína, respectivamente.
El material de estudio estuvo compuesto por cuarenta y ocho ratas
Sprague Dawley hembras de 20 días de edad. En el grupo que recibió
gluten de trigo en la dieta, el tejido hepático presentó parámetros
histopatológicos e inmunohistoquímicos numéricamente más altos
el día 45 del estudio, y parámetros histopatológicos numéricamente
más altos el día 165 del estudio (P>0,05). El día 165 del estudio, en
comparación con los grupos Maíz y Soja, el Grupo Trigo mostró un
nivel signicativamente diferente de sensibilidad a los parámetros
inmunohistoquímicos (transglutaminasa, gliadina, IgA, IgG, CD4 y
CD8). Se determinó que el gluten redujo signicativamente la actividad
de las enzimas hepáticas LDH y AST. Como resultado, se comprobó
que las ratas no portadoras de los genes HLA–DQ2 y DQ8, cuando
fueron alimentadas con una ración incorporada con un alto nivel de
gluten de trigo, mostraron parámetros histopatológicos del tejido
hepático ligeramente afectados y parámetros inmunohistoquímicos
signicativamente aumentados (transglutaminasa, gliadina, IgA,
IgG, CD4 y CD8).
Palabras clave: Rata; gluten; trigo; maíz; inmunohistoquímica
Effects of experimental wheat and corn gluten on liver tissue in
rats: biochemical, histopathological, immunohistochemical and
immunouorescence methods
Efectos del gluten de trigo y maíz experimental sobre el tejido hepático de ratas: métodos
bioquímicos, histopatológicos, inmunohistoquímicos y de inmunouorescencia
Kübra Asena Terim Kapakin
1
, Recep Gümüş
2
* , İsmail Bolat
1
, Esra Manavoğlu Kirman
1
, Aybüke İmik
3
1
Ataturk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Pathology. Erzurum, Türkiye.
2
Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Disorders. Sivas, Türkiye.
3
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics. Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.
*Corresponding author: rgumus@cumhuriyet.edu.tr
TABLE I
Ingredients and nutrient composition of rat diet in the study
Ingredients, %
Groups
Wheat Corn Soybean
Wheat bran 1.8 3.5 3.24
Oat, %11 CP 68 64 62.11
Sunower meal, % 28 CP 13 13 6
Corn gluten meal, % 62 CP - 17 -
Wheat gluten meal, % 75 CP 24.85 - -
Soybean meal, % 51 CP - - 24.85
Animal fat 2.2 1.5 2.8
Vitamin-mineral premix* 1 1 1
Nutrient composition
Crude protein, % 22 22 22
Metabolisable energy, (kcal·kg
-1
) 2,599 2,657 2,598
Ca, % 0.15 0.11 0.14
Methionine + cysteine, % 0.66 0.83 0.68
Lysine, % 1.17 0.63 1.15
*The vitamin-mineral premix provides the following (per kg): vitamin A 6,000,000 IU;
vitamin D3 800,000 IU; vitamin E 8,000 mg; vitamin K3 2,000 mg; vitamin B1 1,200 mg;
vitamin B2 3,000 mg; vitamin B6 2,000 mg; vitamin B12 8 mg; niacin 10,000 mg; folic
acid 400 mg; d-biotin 20 mg; choline chloride 160,000 mg; manganese 32,000 mg; iron
16,000 mg; zinc 24,000 mg; copper 2,000 mg; iodine 800 mg; cobalt 200 mg; selenium
60 mg; Cal-D-Pan. 4,000 mg; antioxidant 4,000 mg. CP: Crude protein
Effects of experimental wheat and corn gluten on liver tissue in rats / Terim Kapakin et al. _________________________________________
2 of 11
INTRODUCTION
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and corn (Zea mays) are two main cereal
grains, which are most commonly produced and consumed Worldwide
[1]. The main structural constituents of these grains are starch,
cellulose and gluten. The term gluten refers to a complex mixture
of proteins, which is found in grains such as wheat, corn, barley
(Hordeum vulgare), rye (Lolium multiorum) and oat (Avena sativa),
and remains after these grains are processed and washed of their
starch. Nearly 5.4% of wheat grain [2] and 3–3.55% of corn grain is
made of gluten [3].
Normally, gluten contains proteins that are readily digested in the
human intestines [4]. On the other hand, individuals not carrying the
genes HLA–DQ2 and DQ8 are not capable of digesting these proteins.
The consumption of gluten–containing diets by these persons may
lead to multiple health problems. These health problems include
coeliac disease, gluten intolerance, non–coeliac gluten sensitivity,
wheat allergy, and dermatitis herpetiformis [5, 6]. The sensitivity of
tissues to gluten is determined in view of histopathological ndings
and immunohistochemical analyses [7].
In the present study, healthy rats were provided with gluten–rich
feed for a long–term period and the sensitivity of their hepatic tissue
to gluten was investigated. Histopathological alterations in the
hepatic tissue were assessed on the basis of several parameters,
including degeneration, inammation, biliary hyperplasia, and fat
droplets, whilst immunohistochemical analyses were performed for
the measurement of transglutaminase, gliadin, IgA, IgG, CD4 and CD8
levels. Also, AST, ALT, ALP and LDH levels, which are liver enzymes,
were investigated in serum tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal material, experimental groups, and feed
In this study, 48 healthy female Sprague–Dawley rats (Rattus
norvegicus), 20 days (d) old, were raised until they reached 185 d of
age (the trial period lasted 165 d) by being fed experimental diets. The
rations given to the study groups were isonitrogenous and isocaloric
(TABLE I). Three study groups were established, named Group Wheat,
Group Corn, and Group Soybean, each receiving dietary wheat gluten,
corn gluten, and soybean meal, respectively. Throughout the study, the
animals were fed for 165 d, with feed and water available ad libitum,
and were maintained at a comfort temperature of 22°C.
In the present study, healthy rats, confirmed not to carry the
genes HLA–DQ2 and DQ8, were fed on rations supplemented with
high levels of wheat gluten and corn gluten for a period of 165 d, with
to investigate the effects of gluten and the sensitivity displayed by
hepatic tissue to gluten. The effects of gluten on hepatic tissue were
determined based on the measurement of histopathological and
immunohistochemical parameters and enzyme activity in hepatic
tissue samples on d 45 and 165 of the study.
Pathological examination
Rats were sacriced under anesthesia at the average ages of 65 and
185 d, and tissue samples were collected. Liver tissue samples were
obtained for histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis, and
lesions were scored semi–quantitatively based on the microscopic
(Olympus BX51, Japan) examination of 10 different areas at 40×
magnication. Histopathologically, Degeneration, Inammation,
Biliary hyperplasia and Fat drop scoring were performed in liver
tissues. Immunohistochemically, Transglutaminase, Gliadin, IgA,
IgG, CD4 and CD8 expression levels were scored. The scoring was
as follows: 0 (negative), +1 (slight), +2 (moderate), +3 (severe), and
+4 (very severe) [8].
Histopathological examination
For histopathological examination, tissue specimens were initially
xed in 10% buffered formalin for 48–72 hours and then rinsed under
running water for 6–8 hours. The specimens were then processed
using a routine tissue processing method, which involved passing
them through graded alcohols (70°, 80°, 90°, 96°, and 100°) and xylene
series. After embedding in paran, 4 μm thick sections were cut from
the paran blocks and mounted on glass slides. The histopathological
sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (HE) [9, 10] and were
examined and imaged using an Olympus BX52 1 light microscope
(Japan) with a DP72 camera system, at the Pathology Department
Laboratory of Atatürk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine.
Immunohistochemical examination
All sections mounted on poly–L–lysine–coated adhesive glass slides
for immunoperoxidase analysis were subjected to deparanization
and dehydration by passing through a series of graded xylene and
alcohol, followed by a 5–min wash in distilled water. The slides
were then immersed in phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH 7.2) for
5 min and subsequently treated with 3% H
2
O
2
for 10 min to inhibit
endogenous peroxidase activity. Following this, the slides were rinsed
in PBS for 5–10 min and incubated with a protein–blocking solution
compatible with all primary and secondary antibodies for 5 min to
TABLE II
Values obtained with the histopathological,
immunohistochemical, and immunouorescence staining
in liver tissues taken from average 65 days old rats
n
Histopathological
Parameters
Immunohistochemical
Parameters
Deg Inf Bh Fd
TG
IHC/IF
Gld
IHC/IF
IgA IgG CD4 CD8
Wheat Group
1 +2 +2 +2 +2 +2 +2 +3 +2 +1 +2
2 +2 +2 +1 +1 +2 +2 +3 +2 +2 +2
3 +2 +1 0 0 +2 +2 +2 +2 +1 +2
4 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +2 +2 +2 +1 +2
5 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +2 +1 +1 +1 +1
6 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +2 +1 +1 +1 +1
7 0 0 0 0 +1 +1 0 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Corn Group
1 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +1 +2 +2 +1 +1
2 +2 +2 +1 +1 +1 +1 +2 +2 +1 +1
3 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
4 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +1 +2 +1 +1 +2
5 +1 0 0 0 +1 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soybean Group
1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +2 +1 +1
2 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +1 +2 +1 +1 +1
3 +1 0 0 0 +1 0 +1 +1 +1 +1
4 +1 0 0 0 +1 0 +1 +1 0 +1
5 +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deg: Degeneration, Inf: Inammation, Bh: Biliary hyperplasia, Fd: Fat drop, TG:
Transglutaminase, Gld: Gliadin, IgA: Immunoglobulin A, IgG: Immunoglobulin G
_____________________________________________________________________________Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34500
3 of 11
prevent non–specic background staining. After incubation, excess
blocking solution was removed, and without further washing, the
slides were exposed to primary antibodies, including CD4 (Catalog
No: BS–0647–R), CD8 (Catalog No: BS–0648–R), IgA (Catalog No:
BS–0648–R10491–R), IgG (Catalog No: BS–0392–R), gliadin (Catalog
No: NB600–54713374–R), and transglutaminase 2/TGM2 (Catalog
No: NB600–547). Depending on the specific primary antibody,
incubation was conducted either for 1 hour at room temperature
or overnight at +4°C. The slides were then washed twice in PBS,
each time for 5min, and incubated with a biotinylated secondary
antibody at room temperature for 10–30 min. After another PBS wash,
the slides were treated with streptavidin–peroxidase for 10–30 min
and washed again with PBS. The sections were then treated with
DAB (3,3–diaminobenzidine) as a chromogen for 5–10 min. Finally,
background staining was performed using Mayers hematoxylin for 1–2
min, followed by rinsing with tap water and mounting with a water–
based adhesive [1, 11].
Immunouorescence examination
All sections mounted on poly–L–lysine–coated adhesive glass slides
for immunouorescence analysis underwent deparanization and
dehydration by passing through a series of graded xylene and alcohol
solutions, followed by a 5–min rinse in distilled water. The slides were
then immersed in phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH 7.2) for 5 min
before being treated with 3% H
2
O
2
for 10 min to inhibit endogenous
peroxidase activity. Afterward, the slides were rinsed in PBS for
5–10 min and incubated with a protein–blocking solution for 5 min
to prevent non–specic background staining. At the conclusion of
the incubation, any excess blocking solution was removed from the
slides, which were then directly treated with the primary antibodies
gliadin (Catalog No: NB600–54713374–R) and transglutaminase 2/
TGM2 (Catalog No: NB600–547) without additional washing. Depending
on the specic primary antibody, incubation was carried out either
for 1 hour at room temperature or overnight at +4°C. The slides were
subsequently washed twice in PBS, each time for 5 min, and then
incubated with a secondary uorescein antibody (FITC) in a dark room
for 45 min. Finally, the sections were washed with PBS, covered with
a coverslip, and examined under a uorescence microscope (ZEISS
AXIO Scope A1) (ZEISS AXIO Scope A1, Germany), with images captured
from the necessary areas [12].
Biochemical examination
On the 45
th
and 165
th
d of the study, venous blood samples were
collected from eight animals per study group into 10 mL glass tubes
containing a coagulation accelerator. In the Biochemistry Department
Laboratory at Atatürk University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, the
blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 G and +4°C for 5 min. The
extracted serum was stored at -82°C until analysis. Serum levels of
AST, ALT, LDH, and ALP were measured using an automatic analyzer
with commercial test kits (Cobas 6000 analyzer, Roche) [13].
Statistical analyses
The statistical analysis of the results from this study was conducted
using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software
[14]. One–way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to analyze
serum levels of AST, ALT, LDH, and ALP, while Duncan’s test was used
to determine the signicance of differences between study groups.
Histopathological and immunohistochemical changes in the liver were
assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, a non–parametric method.
Data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Values of P<0.05 and P<0.01 were considered statistically signicant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Findings pertaining to the histopathological, immunohistochemical,
and immunofluorescence parameters of the hepatic tissue on
day 45 of the study (at 65 d of age) are presented in TABLE II, the
graphic representation of these ndings is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2,
and the results of the statistical analysis of the ndings are given in
TABLE III. Furthermore, ndings pertaining to the histopathological,
immunohistochemical, and immunouorescence parameters of the
hepatic tissue on day 165 of the study (at 185 d of age) are presented
in TABLE IV, the graphic representation of these ndings is shown in
FIGS. 3 and 4, and the results of the statistical analysis of the ndings
are given in TABLE V.
Wheat Corn Soybean
H&EIgAIgGCD4CD8
FIGURE 1. Liver tissue, 65–day–old rat, histopathological appearance, H&E, Bar: 70 µm. immunohistochemical staining results, IHC–P, Bar: 70 µm
Effects of experimental wheat and corn gluten on liver tissue in rats / Terim Kapakin et al. _________________________________________
4 of 11
The histopathological ndings detected in the hepatic tissue on
d 45 and 165 of the study (degeneration, necrosis, inammation,
biliary hyperplasia, fat droplets) were more severe in Group Wheat,
compared to the other groups, yet this numerical difference was
statistically insignicant (P>0.05) (TABLES III and V). Images of the
study are given in FIGS. 1 and 3.
In view of the length of period, during which the animals were fed
on the trial rations supplemented with wheat gluten, corn gluten and
soybean meal, it was observed that the severity of the histopathological
ndings in the hepatic tissue samples of all groups had signicantly
increased over time (165 d of feeding), and the severity was greatest in the
group, which was given wheat gluten (P<0.05). Furthermore, the hepatic
histopathological ndings of the group that received dietary soybean
meal were more severe, compared to the group fed on corn gluten.
On d 45 of the study, the immunopositivity rates determined for
anti–transglutaminase, anti–gliadin, IgA, IgG, anti–CD4 and anti–CD8
TABLE IV
Values obtained with the histopathological,
immunohistochemical, and immunouorescence staining
in liver tissues taken from average 185 days old rats
n
Histopathological
Parameters
Immunohistochemical
Parameters
Deg Inf Bh Fd
TG
IHC/IF
Gld
IHC/IF
IgA IgG CD4 CD8
Wheat Group
1 +3 +2 +2 +3 +3 +4 +4 +2 +2 +3
2 +3 +2 +2 +3 +3 +4 +4 +2 +2 +3
3 +2 +2 +2 +2 +3 +3 +3 +2 +2 +3
4 +2 +2 +1 +2 +3 +3 +3 +1 +2 +3
5 +2 +1 +1 +2 +2 +3 +3 +1 +1 +2
6 +2 +2 +1 +1 +2 +2 +2 +1 +1 +2
7 +1 +2 +1 +1 +1 +1 +2 +1 +1 +2
8 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
Corn Group
1 +2 +2 +2 +2 +2 +2 +3 +1 +2 +2
2 +2 +1 +2 +2 +2 +2 +3 +1 +2 +2
3 +2 +2 +2 +1 +1 +2 +3 +1 +1 +2
4 +1 +1 +1 0 +1 +1 +2 +1 +1 +1
5 +1 +1 +1 +1 0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
6 +1 +1 +1 0 0 +1 +1 0 0 +1
7 +1 0 0 0 0 0 +1 0 0 0
8 +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Soybean Group
1 +2 +2 +2 +2 +2 +2 +2 +1 +1 +2
2 +2 +1 +2 +1 +2 +1 +2 +1 +1 +2
3 +2 +2 +2 +2 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +2
4 +2 +2 +1 +1 0 +1 +1 +1 +1 +2
5 +1 +1 +1 +1 0 0 +2 0 +1 +1
6 +1 +1 +1 0 0 0 +1 0 0 +1
7 +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deg: Degeneration, Inf: Inammation, Bh: Biliary hyperplasia, Fd: Fat drop, TG:
Transglutaminase, Gld: Gliadin, IgA: Immunoglobulin A, IgG: Immunoglobulin G
TABLE III
Statistical values of the histopathological, immunohistochemical,
and immunouorescence parameters of the liver tissue
samples taken from average 65 d old rats
Parameters
Groups
P–values
Wheat Corn Soybean
Histopathological
Deg
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.13 ± 0.295 0.75 ± 0.250 0.83 ± 0.166
0.482
Median 1.00 1.00 1.00
Inf
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.00 ± 0.267 0.63 ± 0.263 0.33 ± 0.210
0.156
Median 1.00 0.50 0.00
Bh
X
̄
 ± SEM 0.38 ± 0.263 0.13 ± 0.125 0.17 ± 0.166
0.733
Median 0.00 0.00 0.00
Fd
X
̄
 ± SEM 0.38 ± 0.263 0.13 ± 0.125 0.17 ± 0.166
0.733
Median 0.00 0.00 0.00
Immunohistochemical and Immunouorescence
TG
IHC/IF
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.25 ± 0.250 0.63 ± 0.183 0.57 ± 0.202
0.066
Median 1.00 1.00 1.00
Gld
IHC/IF
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.63 ± 0.263
a
0.50 ± 0.189
b
0.29 ± 0.184
b
0.001
Median 2.00 0.50 0.00
IgA
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.50 ± 0.422 0.88 ± 0.350 0.83 ± 0.307
0.351
Median 1.50 0.50 1.00
IgG
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.25 ± 0.313 0.75 ± 0.313 0.83 ± 0.307
0.390
Median 1.50 0.50 1.00
CD4
X
̄
 ± SEM 0.88 ± 0.226 0.50 ± 0.188 0.50 ± 0.223
0.314
Median 1.00 0.50 0.50
CD8
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.25 ± 0.313 0.63 ± 0.263 0.67 ± 0.210
0.198
Median 1.50 0.50 1.00
The values are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), n=8,
a, b
: Means in
the same line with dierent superscripts dier signicantly (*:
P<0.05), (**: P<0.01).
Deg: Degeneration, Inf: Inammation, Bh: Biliary hyperplasia, Fd: Fat drop, TG:
Transglutaminase, Gld: Gliadin, IgA: Immunoglobulin A, IgG: Immunoglobulin G
_____________________________________________________________________________Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34500
5 of 11
antibodies, by means of the immunohistochemical examination of
the hepatic tissue samples, were found to be higher in the group
fed on wheat gluten, compared to the other study groups, yet
this difference was except for gliadin statistically insignificant
(TABLEIII). It was ascertained that the immunopositivity rates for
anti–transglutaminase, anti–gliadin, IgA, IgG, anti–CD4 and anti–CD8
antibodies increased over time (highest on day 165 of feeding) in all
groups with the highest rates having been determined in the group
fed on wheat gluten (P<0.05) (TABLE V). The images obtained in this
study are presented in FIGS. 3 and 4.
On d 185 of the study, the immunopositivity inase, anti–gliadin,
IgA, IgG, anti–CD4, and anti–CD8 antibodies by means of the
immunouorescence examination of the hepatic tissue samples,
were found to be higher in the group fed on wheat gluten compared
to the other study groups (TABLE V). It was ascertained that the
immunopositivity rates for anti–transglutaminase, and anti–gliadin
antibodies increased over time (highest on d 165 of feeding) in all
groups with the highest rates having been determined in the group
fed on wheat gluten (P<0.05) (TABLE V). The images obtained in this
study are presented in FIGS. 3 and 4.
The serum levels of the hepatic enzymes investigated in the present
study are given in TABLE VI. It was determined that while the levels
of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
signicantly differed from each other at 65 d of age, the levels of
aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and LDH showed significant
differences from each other at 185 d of age (P<0.05).
Today, gluten–containing foods have become an essential
component of the human diet and individuals carrying the genes
HLA–DQ2 and DQ8 confront various health problems, which are related
to both the digestion of the structural proteins of gluten, and the
metabolism of these proteins [9]. The gliadin peptides, which are
generated upon the breakdown of gluten in the digestive system,
bind to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, and thereby,
induce the onset of clinical signs and immunological processes.
It is known that the structural peptides of gliadin induce cellular,
Wheat Corn Soybean
TGM2/IHCTGM/IFGliadin/IHCGliadin/IF
FIGURE 2. Liver tissue, 65–day–old rat, immunohistochemical and immunouorescence staining results, IHC–P, Bar:70 um, IF, Bar: 50 µm
Effects of experimental wheat and corn gluten on liver tissue in rats / Terim Kapakin et al. _________________________________________
6 of 11
humoral and inammatory responses in tissues [15]. Given that its
structural peptides are resistant to both proteases and proteolysis in
the gastrointestinal tract of coeliac disease patients, gliadin cannot
be fully digested, and eventually triggers intestinal T cells [15]. The
emergence and advance of autoimmune diseases increases directly
proportional to the length of the period of exposure to gluten [16].
Reactions arising from gluten sensitivity are observed primarily
in the intestines, but have also been reported in other organs and
tissues [7, 17, 18]. In the present study, it was observed that glutens
led to histopathological lesions in the hepatic tissue. Examination of
hepatic tissue samples demonstrated that gluten exposure had led
to the degeneration and necrosis of hepatocytes, biliary hyperplasia,
and an increased number of fat droplets. These ndings are also
observed in the event of intoxication, infection and stress [19]. These
ndings suggest that, similar histopathological ndings may develop
in the hepatic tissue of animals fed on various protein sources (wheat
gluten, corn gluten, soybean meal).
TABLE V
Statistical values of the histopathological, immunohistochemical,
and immunouorescence parameters of the liver tissue
samples taken from average 185 days old rats
Parameters
Groups
P–values
Wheat Corn Soybean
Histopathological
Deg
X
̄
 ± SEM 2.00 ± 0.27 1.375 ± 0.183 1.50 ± 0.188
0.168
Median 2.00 1.00 1.50
Inf
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.75 ± 0.164 1.00 ± 0.267 1.125 ± 0.295
0.096
Median 2.00 1.00 1.00
Bh
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.25 ± 0.25 1.125 ± 0.295 1.125 ± 0.295
0.947
Median 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fd
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.75 ± 0.366 0.75 ± 0.313 0.875 ± 0.295
0.110
Median 2.00 0.50 1.00
Immunohistochemical and Immunouorescence
TG
IHC/IF
X
̄
 ± SEM 2.25 ± 0.313
a
0.75 ± 0.313
b
0.71 ± 0.360
b
0.066
Median 2.50 0.50 0.00
Gld
IHC/IF
X
̄
 ± SEM 2.63 ± 0.420
a
1.13 ± 0.295
b
0.71 ± 0.286
b
0.001
Median 3.00 1.00 1.00
IgA
X
̄
 ± SEM 2.75 ± 0.366
a
1.75 ± 0.41
ab
1.125 ± 0.295
b
0.351
Median 3.00 1.50 1.00
IgG
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.375 ± 0.183
a
0.63 ± 0.183
b
0.50 ± 0.189
b
0.390
Median 1.00 1.00 0.50
CD4
X
̄
 ± SEM 1.50 ± 0.189
a
0.875 ± 0.295
b
0.625 ± 0.183
b
0.314
Median 1.50 1.00 1.00
CD8
X
̄
 ± SEM 2.375 ± 0.263
a
1.375 ± 0.83
b
1.50 ± 0.189
b
0.198
Median 2.00 1.00 1.50
The values are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), n=8,
a, b
: Means in
the same line with dierent superscripts dier signicantly (*:
P<0.05), (**: P<0.01).
Deg: Degeneration, Inf: Inammation, Bh: Biliary hyperplasia, Fd: Fat drop, TG:
Transglutaminase, Gld: Gliadin, IgA: Immunoglobulin A, IgG: Immunoglobulin G
TABLE VI
Statistical values of the liver enzyme levels of the serum tissue samples
Parameters
Groups
P–values
Wheat Corn Soybean
65 days of age
AST 350.000 ± 35.972 392.000 ± 30.430 364.000 ± 30.100 0.655
ALT 541.000 ± 136.125
a
227.000 ± 23.791
b
211.000 ± 27.019
b
0.023
AST/ALT 0.65 1.73 1.73
ALP 155.600 ± 21.951 128.800 ± 29.778 184.400 ± 16.690 0.282
LDH 401.800 ± 32.346
b
516.600 ± 21.919
a
535.600 ± 12.258
a
0.004
185 days of age
AST 400.000 ± 13.928
b
516.000 ± 37.736
a
490.000 ± 23.749
a
0.025
ALT 179.000 ± 73.034 241.000 ± 59.414 213.000 ± 66.888 0.808
AST/ALT 2.24 2.14 2.30
ALP 133.400 ± 14.497 105.500 ± 13.093 166.800 ± 25.498 0.135
LDH 451.800 ± 19.059
b
554.800 ± 26.097
a
507.200 ± 10.283
ab
0.010
The values are given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). n=8,
a, b
: Means
in the same line with different superscripts differ significantly (
P<0.05, P<0.01).
AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase and ALP: alkaline
phosphatase, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase
_____________________________________________________________________________Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34500
7 of 11
It was ascertained that, on days 45 and 165 of the study, the
differences between the increases in the histopathological ndings
of the hepatic tissue (degeneration, necrosis, inammation, biliary
hyperplasia and fat droplets) were statistically insignicant (TABLESIII
and V). On the other hand, on both d 45 and 165 of the study, values
pertaining to the severity of the histopathological ndings in the
hepatic tissue, including degeneration, necrosis, inammation,
biliary hyperplasia and fat droplets, were numerically higher in Group
Wheat, compared to the other study groups, and this suggests that
the hepatic tissue is more sensitive to wheat gluten. It is known that
the prolonged consumption of gluten–containing foods increases the
risk of gluten–related diseases in humans [16, 20].
Immunohistochemical examinations are essential to determining
histopathological tissue lesions, which develop in response to
gluten sensitivity. Immunohistochemical examinations enable the
determination of immunopositivity at cellular and tissue level, as
well as, the localization and distribution of specic cell components.
These examinations are based on the identication of specic cell or
tissue components by means of antigen–antibody reactions [21]. The
agreement of the results of these analyses with those of conventional
pathological and cytological examinations and other ndings is highly
important [22, 23].
Tissue anti–transglutaminase antibodies are produced by means of
a complicated mechanism. Glutens, found in the structure of cereal
proteins (and primarily gliadins), are perceived by tissues as antigens.
Thus, T cells are stimulated for the synthesis of antibodies against these
antigens. This results in increased levels of anti–transglutaminase
antibodies in tissues. A typical example to this is the increased levels
of anti–transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) in the hepatic tissue of
humans, who carry the genes HLA–DQ2 and DQ8 and consume wheat
gluten [9, 24, 25]. In the present study, although no marked increase
was detected in the hepatic tissue anti–transglutaminase antibody
levels of 65 days old rats fed on glutens, it was observed that sensitivity
reactions increased in the hepatic tissue over time and with prolonged
feeding on gluten (165d). Furthermore, the highest tissue levels of
anti–transglutaminase antibodies were determined in the group fed on
wheat gluten. The present study, which was carried out on healthy rats,
demonstrated that gluten sensitivity is not only observed in humans
carrying the genes HLA–DQ2 and DQ8, such that similar gluten–induced
reactions can be observed in the hepatic tissue of animals not carrying
these genes. In a study conducted on rats, it was reported that tissue
transglutaminase 2 levels increased in groups given wheat and corn
gluten, and immunopositivity for transglutaminase antibody was
observed in hepatocytes, inammatory cells, and epithelial cells of
the glands [1]. In another study, immunohistochemical examination
of liver tissues in celiac patients revealed that transaminase antibody
release was increased, particularly in endothelial cells and periportal
hepatocytes [9].
While it is reported that the level of anti–gliadin antibodies generally
increases in chronic diseases, 90% of untreated coeliac disease
patients also have increased tissue levels of anti–gliadin antibodies
[26]. The gliadin protein is presented to reactive CD4+T cells by
a T cell receptor, which triggers the production of cytokines that
cause tissue damage. CD4 and T cells increase the levels of T Helper
1 and T Helper 2, both of which are proinflammatory cytokines.
These cytokines, in return, bring about the generation of rstly B–
lymphocytes and then plasma cells. Plasma cells produce anti–gliadin
and anti–transglutaminase antibodies [26]. In the present study, the
level of immunopositivity for anti–gliadin antibodies in the hepatic
Wheat Corn Soybean
H&EIgAIgGCD4CD8
FIGURE 3. Liver tissue, 185–day–old rat, histopathological appearance, H&E, Bar: 70 µm. immunohistochemical staining results, IHC–P, Bar: 70 µm
Effects of experimental wheat and corn gluten on liver tissue in rats / Terim Kapakin et al. _________________________________________
8 of 11
tissue on d 45 and 165 of the study having observed to differ, points
out to the signicance of the length of the gluten exposure period
in the development of tissue sensitivity. The ndings of the present
study showed that the group displaying the highest sensitivity level
to anti–gliadin antibodies was Group Wheat. An important nding of
the present study was the increase that occurred in tissue sensitivity
with prolonged exposure to wheat gluten, even in healthy animals.
IgA is a primary component of many external secretions. Secretory
IgA molecules are particularly effective against microbial agents on
mucosal surfaces, and by preventing bacterial pathogens and their
toxins from adhering to mucosal epithelial cells, they neutralize these
agents. IgG is produced during the secondary immune response and
dominates the extracellular uid [27]. IgG antibodies act as opsonin
and activate the complement system via the classical pathway [28,
29, 30]. On d 45 of the study, the IgA and IgG levels of Group Wheat
were observed to be numerically higher. It was determined that the
statistical differences observed between the groups increased with
the prolongation of the period of exposure (period of feeding on
Wheat Corn Soybean
TGM2/IHCTGM/IFGliadin/IHCGliadin/IF
FIGURE 4. Liver tissue, 185–day–old rat, immunohistochemical and immunouorescence staining results, IHC–P, Bar:70 um, IF, Bar: 50 µm
_____________________________________________________________________________Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34500
9 of 11
gluten). Both IgA and IgG levels were observed to have signicantly
increased in the group fed on wheat gluten.
Hepatic enzyme activities are known to vary with several factors,
including among others disease, stress, pharmaceutical treatment,
environmental factors and nutrition. Damage to hepatic tissue, either
with a symptomatic or asymptomatic clinical course, leads to elevated
hepatic enzyme levels [31, 32, 33]
. Multiple studies have reported that
glutens cause damage to various tissues and organs, initially in the
intestines, in individuals carrying the genes HLA–DQ2 and DQ8 [1, 5].
The present study demonstrated the effect of gluten–containing feed
rations on liver enzyme activities. The investigation of the effects of
dietary wheat gluten, corn gluten and soybean meal on liver enzyme
activities in the study groups revealed no effect on AST and ALP
activities at 65 days of age, and interestingly, higher AST activity in
Group Wheat and higher ALP activity in Groups Wheat and Corn at
185 d of age. The ALT activity of Group Wheat determined to have
signicantly increased at 65 days of age and to have decreased at
185 d of age suggests the enzyme activity of the hepatic tissue to
Effects of experimental wheat and corn gluten on liver tissue in rats / Terim Kapakin et al. _________________________________________
10 of 11
have adapted to gluten exposure. In Group Wheat, LDH activity being
lower than that of Groups Corn and Soybean at 65 d of age, and being
signicantly higher than that of Group Soybean demonstrates the
impact of diet on liver enzyme activities. Furthermore, the AST/ALT
ratio having increased, and having exceeded a value of 2.00 in all
study groups shows that liver enzyme activities are not only affected
by diet, but also by age. In a study conducted on rats, it was reported
that in the group where corn gluten was used as a protein source,
serum AST and ALT levels decreased, while ALP levels and AST/ALT
ratio were similar to those in the control group [34].
CONCLUSIONS
It was ascertained that, compared to the groups that received
dietary corn gluten and soybean meal, the group fed on wheat gluten
presented with more severe adverse histopathological effects on the
hepatic tissue, including degeneration, necrosis and fat droplets.
Furthermore, it was determined that prolonged exposure increased
the adverse effects of dietary gluten on the immunohistochemical
parameters of the hepatic tissue. Wheat gluten was found to have
signicantly increased the immunopositivity levels for all of the
antibodies (anti–transglutaminase, anti–gliadin, IgA, IgG, anti–
CD4 and anti–CD8 antibodies) used in the immunohistochemical
examinations. It is considered that the ndings of the present study
will provide a reference for future studies on gluten metabolism and
autoimmune disorders.
Ethical approval
The experimental protocol of the study was approved by the Sivas
Cumhuriyet University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee’s
decision dated 2024 and numbered 08.
Conicts of interest
The authors have no declaration of competing interests.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
[1] Gümüş R, Kapakin KAT, Kirman EM, Bolat İ, İmik A, Ercan N. The
effect of adding wheat and corn gluten to the diet of rats on
autoimmune and histopathological parameters in the intestine
and liver. Rev. Cient. FCV–LUZ [Internet]. 2024; 34(1):e34351.
doi: https://doi.org/mpwq
[2] Kaushik R, Kumar N, Sihag MK, Ray A. Isolation, characterization of
wheat gluten and its regeneration properties. J. Food. Sci. Technol.
[Internet]. 2015; 52(9):5930–5937. doi: https://doi.org/f7pv99
[3] Schroeder JW. Corn gluten feed: composition, storage, handling,
feeding and value. North Dakota (USA): North Dakota State
University, Department of Agriculture and Applied Science,
Cooperating Report AS–1127 (p. 1); 1997 [cited 20 Jan. 2024].
Available in: https://goo.su/I1rEUS
[4] Picariello G, Siano F, Di Stasio L, Mamone G, Addeo F, Ferranti
P. Structural properties of food proteins underlying stability or
susceptibility to human gastrointestinal digestion. Curr. Opin.
Food Sci. [Internet]. 2023; 50:100992. doi: https://doi.org/g8xfhv
[5] Abbasi A, Bazzaz S, Ibrahim SA, Hekmatdoost A, Hosseini H, Sabahi
S, Sheykhsaran E, Rahbar–Saadat Y, Asghari–Ozma M, Lahouty
M. A critical review on the gluten–induced enteropathy/celiac
disease: gluten–targeted dietary and non–dietary therapeutic
approaches. Food Rev. Int. [Internet]. 2024; 40(3):883–923. doi:
https://doi.org/g8xfhw
[6] Sapone A, Bai JC, Ciacci C, Dolinsek J, Green PHR, Hadjivassiliou
M, Kaukinen K, Rostami K, Sanders DS, Schumann M, Ullrich R,
Villalta D, Volta U, Catassi C, Fasano A. Spectrum of gluten–related
disorders: consensus on new nomenclature and classication.
BMC Med. [Internet]. 2012; 10(13):1–12. doi: https://doi.org/gb33h2
[7] Gümüş R, Uslu S, Aydoğdu U, İmik A, Ekici M. Investigation of
the effects of glutens on serum interleukin–1 beta and tumor
necrosis factor–alpha levels and the immunohistochemical
distribution of CD3 and CD8 receptors in the small intestine
in male rats. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. [Internet]. 2021;
64(25):e21210256. doi: https://doi.org/mjtc
[8] Terim Kapakin KA, Gümüş R, İmik H, Kapakin S, Sağlam YS.
Effects of ascorbic and α–lipoic acid on secretion of HSP–70 and
apoptosis in liver and kidneys of broilers exposed to heat stress.
Ankara Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg. [Internet]. 2012; 59(4):279–287. doi:
https://doi.org/mjr8
[9] Drastich P, Honsová E, Lodererová A, Jarešová M, Pekáriko
A, Hoffmanová I, Tučková L, Tlaskalová–Hogenová H, Spičák J,
Sánchez D. Celiac disease markers in patients with liver diseases: a
single center large scale screening study. World. J. Gastroenterol.
[Internet]. 2012; 18(43):6255–6262. doi: https://doi.org/f4fn3h
[10] Terim Kapakin KA, Sahin M, Buyuk F, Kapakin, S, Gursan N,
Saglam YS. Respiratory tract infection induced experimentally by
Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in quails: effects on heat shock
proteins and apoptosis. Revue Méd. Vét. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 23
May 2024]; 164(3):132–140. Available in: https://goo.su/EimwIBT
[11] Dokumacioglu E, Iskender H, Yenice G, Kapakin KAT, Sevim C,
Hayirli A, Saral S, Comakli S. Effects of astaxanthin on biochemical
and histopathological parameters related to oxidative stress on
testes of rats on high fructose regime. Andrologia [Internet].
2018; 50(7):e13042. doi: https://doi.org/gmt9jz
[12] Karaman M, Toraman E, Sulukan E, Baran A, Bolat İ, Yıldırım S,
Kankaynar M, Ghosigharehagaji A, Budak H, Ceyhun SB. Fluoride
exposure causes behavioral, molecular and physiological changes
in adult zebrash (Danio rerio) and their offspring. Environ. Toxicol.
Pharmacol. [Internet]. 2023; 97:104044. doi: https://doi.org/gzwh8b
[13] Gümüş R, Özbilgin A. Broyler Rasyonuna İlave Edilen Resveratrol
ve Kurkumin Ekstraktlarının Serumda Biyokimyasal Parametreler
ve Karaciğer Enzimleri Üzerine Etkileri [Effects of resveratrol
and curcumin extracts added to broiler diet on biochemical
parameters and liver enzymes in serum]. Türk Tarım Gıda Bilim.
Ve Teknoloji Derg. [Turkish JAF Sci.Tech.]. [Internet]. 2022;
10(3):434–439. Turkish. doi: https://doi.org/g8xfhx
[14] IBM. SPSS Statistics for Windows [software]. Version 20.0.
Armonk (NY, USA): IBM Corp; 2011.
[15] Molberg O, McAdam S, Lundin KE, Kristiansen C, Arentz‐
Hansen H, Kett K, Sollid LM. T cells from celiac disease lesions
recognize gliadin epitopes deamidated in situ by endogenous
tissue transglutaminase. Eur. J. Immunol. [Internet]. 2001;
31(5):1317–1323. doi: https://doi.org/cm2h26
_____________________________________________________________________________Revista Cientifica, FCV-LUZ / Vol. XXXIV, rcfcv-e34500
11 of 11
[16] Ventura A, Magazzù G, Greco L. Duration of exposure to gluten
and risk for autoimmune disorders in patients with celiac
disease. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 1999; 117(2): 297–303.
doi: https://doi.org/fspntd
[17] Jena A, Kumar‐M P, Kumar A, Birda CL, Choudhury A, Kumar
N, Ramai D, Facciorusso A, Samanta J. Liver abnormalities in
celiac disease and response to gluten free diet: A systematic
review and meta‐analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. [Internet].
2023; 38(1):11–22. doi: https://doi.org/gq5hzp
[18] Maki M, Lohi O. Celiac Disease. In: Walker WA, Goulet O, Kleinman
RE, Sherman PM, Shneider BL, Sanderson IR, editors. Pediatric
gastrointestinal disease, Vol. 1. 4
th
ed. Ontario (Canada): BC
Decker Inc.; 2004. p. 932–943.
[19] López Panqueva RdP. Hepatopathology for gastroenterologists
and hepatologists. Rev. Col. Gastroenterol. [Internet]. 2013 [cited
12 Jun. 2024]; 28(2):161–168. Available in: https://goo.su/DlBO
[20] Raju SA, Rej A, Sanders DS. The truth about gluten! Br. J. Nutr.
[Internet]. 2023; 129(2):255–261. doi: https://doi.org/g8xfhz
[21] Miranda ME, García–Valdés L, Espigares–Rodríguez E, Leno–Durán
E, Requena P. Non–celiac gluten sensitivity: Clinical presentation,
etiology and differential diagnosis. Gastroenterol. hepatol.
[Internet]. 2023; 46(7):562–571, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/g8xfh2
[22] Demireken FG, Kansu A, Kuloğlu Z, Girgin N, Güriz H, Ensar
A. Human tissue transglutaminase antibody screening by
immunochromatographic line immunoassay for early diagnosis
of celiac disease in Turkish children. Turk. J. Gastroenterol.
[Internet]. 2008 [cited 12 Jun. 2024]; 19(1):14–21. PMID: 18386235.
Available in: https://goo.su/L43Ucs
[23] Korponay–Szabó IR, Dahlbom I, Laurila K, Koskinen S, Woolley
N, Partanen J, Kocs JB, Mäki M, Hansson T. Elevation of IgG
antibodies against tissue transglutaminase as a diagnostic tool
for coeliac disease in selective IgA deciency. Gut [Internet].
2003; 52(11):1567–1571. doi: https://doi.org/cdp6qm
[24] Khan A, Li S, Han H, Jin WL, Ling Z, Ji J, Iram S, Liu P, Xiao S,
Salama ES, Li X. A gluten degrading probiotic Bacillus subtilis
LZU–GM relieve adverse effect of gluten additive food and
balances gut microbiota in mice. Food Res. Int. [Internet]. 2023;
170:112960. doi: https://doi.org/g8xfh3
[25] Volta U. Pathogenesis and clinical signicance of liver injuryin
celiac disease. Clin. Rev. Allergy. Immunol. [Internet]. 2009;
36(1):62–70. doi: https://doi.org/dvrr5z
[26] Green PHR, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N. Engl. J. Med. [Internet].
2007; 357(17):1731–1743. doi: https://doi.org/csbng2
[27] Imik H, Kapakin KAT, Karabulutlu Ö, Gümüş R, Çomaklı S,
Özkaraca M. The effects of dietary wheat and corn glutens on
the histopathological and immunohistochemical structure of the
ovarian tissue and serum and ovarian tissue LH and FSH levels
and lipid proles in rats. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. [Internet].
2023; 66(3):e23210726. doi: https://doi.org/mjsc
[28] Comerford R, Kelly J, Feighery C, Byrned G. IgG anti–tTG
responses in different autoimmune conditions differ in their
epitope targets and subclass usage. Mol. Immunol. [Internet].
2015; 67(2):369–376. doi: https://doi.org/f7swf8
[29] Gatselis NK, Zachou K, Norman GL, Tzellas G, Speletas M, Gabeta
S, Germenis A, Koukoulis GK, Dalekos GN. IgA antibodies against
deamidated gliadin peptides in patients with chronic liver
diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta. [Internet]. 2012; 413(19–20):1683–1688.
doi: https://doi.org/f37t8z
[30] Sánchez D, Tucková L, Sebo P, Michalak M, Whelan A, Sterzl I,
Jelínková L, Havrdová E, Imramovská M, Benes Z, Krupicko
S, Tlaskalová–Hogenová H. Occurrence of IgA and IgG
autoantibodies to calreticulin in coeliac disease and various
autoimmune diseases. J. Autoimmun. [Internet]. 2000;
15(4):441–449. doi: https://doi.org/bmnnxr
[31] Bayraktar V, Coşar AM. Karaciğer enzim yüksekliklerine yaklaşım
[Approach to liver enzyme elevations]. Güncel Gastroenteroloji
Dergisi [Internet]. 2019 [cited 13 Jun. 2024]; 23:41–47. Available
in: https://goo.su/P10U
[32] Ersoy O. Karaciğer Enzim Yüksekliğinin Değerlendirilmesi
[Evaluation of elevated liver enzymes]. Ankara Med. J. [Internet].
2012 [cited 18 May 2024]; 12(3):129–135. Turkish. Available in:
https://goo.su/Dkisz
[33] Imik H, Kaynar O, Ozkanlar S, Gümüş R, Polat H, Ozkanlar YE.
Effects of vitamin C and α–lipoid acid dietary supplementations
on metabolic adaptation of broilers to heat stress. Revue Méd.
Vét. [Internet]. 2013 [cited 18 May 2024]; 164(2):52–59. Available
in: https://goo.su/9ilbM
[34] Gümüş R, Ercan N, İmik H. The effect of high amounts of wheat
gluten meal and corn gluten meal added to the diets on some
serum parameters in rats. Turkish JAF. Sci. Tech. [Internet].
2020; 8(3):698–701. doi: https://doi.org/g8xfh4