Extradition under the Legislation of the Russian Federation and Member States of the European Union

• Elena A. Kupryashina Belgorod State University
• Snezhana S. Khalimonenko Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation
• Aleksander A. Nasonov Voronezh Institute (branch) of the Moscow State University for the Humanities and Economics
• Ekaterina A. Novikova Belgorod law Institute of MIA of Russia
• Sergey F. Shumilin Belgorod law Institute of MIA of Russia

Palabras clave: criminal prosecution, Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, European Convention on Extradition, reasons and conditions for extradition, European arrest warrant.

Resumen

The document analyzes the legislation of the Russian Federation and the member states of the European Union on extradition from the point of view of its compliance with the current European Convention on Extradition. It also makes proposals to improve the rules of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation that regulates the extradition procedure. Methodologically, the work uses scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as the historical, comparative method, all in an integrated approach. Among the conclusions, the fact that for the previous legal provisions to work, its consolidation only in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation is insufficient. The first step to put them into practice could be to discuss the issue of making the necessary amendments to the Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil Matters, as well as in the Family and Criminal Affairs regulations of January 22, 1993, of which the countries of the European Convention on Extradition are parties.

Citas

ALEKSEEVA, Marina Marsovna. 2014. “The policy of “double standards” and the principle of the inevitability of punishment for committing act of terrorism” In: Space and time (Prostranstvo i Vremya). No. 3, Vol. 17, pp. 54-61. (In Russian)

ARSLEGE, 2020. Code of Criminal Procedure. Available online. In: https://www.arslege.pl/kodeks-postepowania-karnego/k13/. Date of consultation: 31/01/2020.

BILLOT, Antoine. 1874. Traite de I ́extradition. Paris, France.

BIRYUKOV, Philip N. 2010. “European evidentiary order” In: Russian Law Journal (Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal). Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 34-40. (In Russian)

BURTSEV, Andrey S; GENZYUK, Ehduard E; LUKYANCHIKOVA, Elena F; MIRONUK, Ivan V; PROKHOROVA, Marina L. 2018. “Legal certainty of legality principle in the legislation of the continental and Anglo-American system” In: The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication – TOJDAC. March Special Edition, pp. 231-234.

BUT'KO, Lyudmila V; MARKHGEYM, Marina V; NOVIKOVA, Alevtina E; POZHAROVA, Lubov A; TONKOV, Evgeniy E. 2017. Personal Dignity in the European Legal Culture. Journal of History Culture and Art Research. Pp. 296-303.

CERTIFICATE OF THE MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND TRADE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 2020. The criminal prosecution of a person. Available online. In: http://www.consultant.ru/. Date of consultation: 20/01/2020. (In Russian).

EUR-LEX. 2002. Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Members-States’ Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA. In: Official Journal L 190, 18/07/2002, pp. 0001-0020.

HOLTZENDORFF, Franz Von. 1884. Traité théorique et pratique de l'Extradition, comprenant l'exposition d'un projet de loi universelle sur l'extradition. Pp. 301-305.

IDIEV, Frederic F; RADZHABOV, Feroze N. 2015. “The mechanism for the extradition (extradition) in the European Union and CIS countries: a comparative legal analysis” In: Legal life. (Pravovaya zhizn'). Num. 4, pp. 124-149. (In Russian)

KHURUHNOVA, David N. 2001. Extradition, transfer and expulsion of persons in state relations: rights, legitimate interests and their guarantees. M., (In Russian).

KLYUCHNIKOV, Alexander Y. 2017. “The execution of the European arrest warrant in Germany. Leningrad Law Journal” In: Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. No. 1, Vol. 47, pp. 180-190. (In Russian)

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 2020. Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Available online. In: https://to14.minjust.ru/. Date of consultation: 31/01/2020. (In Russian).

OFFICIAL INTERNET PORTAL OF LEGAL INFORMATION. 2020. Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. Available online. In: http://www.pravo.gov.ru. Date of consultation: 31/01/2020. (In Russian).

PEERS, Steve. 2004. “Mutual recognition and criminal law in the European Union: Has the Council got it wrong?” In: Common Market Law Review. Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 5-36.

RANCE, Phillips; de BAYNAST, Alexandre. 2001. Europejudiciare: enjeux et perspectives. Paris, France.

ROLIN, Bidda. 1923. Quelques questions relatives a l’extradition. Recueil des Cours. Vol. 1. La Haye, Netherlands.

SIEVERS, Jonathan. 2006. “Too Different to Trust? First Experiences with the Application of the European Arrest Warrant. Security versus Justice?” In: Police and Judicial Cooperation in the European Union. Asgate, pp. 109-128.

TOMUSCHAT. Christian. 2006. “Inconsistencies – The German Federal Constitutional Court on the European Arrest Warrant” In: European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 209-226.

VOYNIKOV, Yulian. 2011. “Legal cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University named after I” In: Kant (Vestnik Baltijskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta). Issue 9, pp. 100-110. (In Russian)