Current Issues and Prospects of Modern Higher Legal Education in Conditions of the Fight against COVID-19
Resumen
The purpose of the document is to determine the current problems and the possible directions for the development and improvement of higher legal education in the modern challenges and conditions of the pandemic and post-pandemic of COVID-2019, under the hypothesis that the upcoming emergency is affirmed again. world order. General-scientific and special-legal methods of cognition have been used. Through the use of the dialectical method, the current problems of modern legal education have also been identified, their foundations have been investigated and instructions have been sought to improve legal education and the quality of young lawyers in the educational environment of the pandemic. In conclusion, it is highlighted that the findings found in the research can be useful for higher education teachers who are constantly adapting to the new conditions of professional activity in the field of legal education, in the scene of pandemic and the ordering after the pandemic, with particular emphasis on specialists focused on developing suggestions and improving the quality of legal education in the context of the global challenges imposed by COVID-2019.
Descargas
Citas
ARKORFUL, Valentina; ABAIDOO, Nelly. 2015. “The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education”. In: International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Vol. 29 No. 12, pp. 29-42.
VON BOGDANDY, Armin; VILLARREAL, Pedro. 2020. International law on pandemic response: a first stocktaking in light of the coronavirus crisis. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law & International Law (MPIL) Available online. In: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3561650. Consultation date: 05/11/2019.
BONE, Alison. 2009. “The twenty-first century law student”. In: The Law Teacher. Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 222-245.
BORMAN, Deborah; HARAS Catherine. 2019. “Something borrowed: interdisciplinary strategies for legal education”. In: Journal of Legal Education. Vol. 68 Num. 2, pp. 357-391.
CARON, PAUL. 2007. Koo on Legal Education and the Promise of Technology. Available online. In: https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2007/03/koo_on_legal_ed.html. Consultation date: 20/11/2019.
COLBRAN, Stephen; GILDING, Anthony; COLBRAN Samuel. 2017. “Animation and multiple-choice questions as a formative feedback tool for legal education” In: The Law Teacher. Vol. 51 Num. 3, pp. 249-273.
DENNIS, Marguerite. 2020. How will higher education have changed after COVID-19? University World News. Available online. In: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200324065639773. Consultation date: 20/11/2019.
DIAZ, Deniel. 2000. Carving a new path for distance education research. The Technology Source. Available online. In: http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=648. Consultation date: 05/11/2019.
GEORGIEV, Tsvetozar; GEORGIEVA, Evgeniya; SMRIKAROV, Angel. 2004. M learning – a new stage of е-learning. In: CompSysTech '04: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, pp. 1 5.
INFORMATION DOCUMENT. 2020. Respecting democracy, rule of law and human rights in the framework of the COVID-19 sanitary crisis. A toolkit for member states. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/sg-inf-2020-11-respecting-democracy-rule-of-law-and-human-rights-in-th/16809e1f40. Consultation date: 05/11/2019.
KILLEAN, Rachel; SUMMERVILLE, Richard. 2020. “Creative podcasting as a tool for legal knowledge and skills development”. In: The Law Teacher. Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 31-42.
KIM, Joshua. 2020. Teaching and learning after COVID-19. Inside Higher Education, Available online. In: https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/learning-innovation/teaching-and-learning-after-covid-19. Consultation date: 20/11/2019.
KLEYNHANS, Amy; BORNSTEIN, Brian. 2015. The competitive advantage of interdisciplinary training in law and social sciences. AP-LS News. American Psychology-Law Society. Available online. In: https://www.apadivisions.org/division-41/publications/newsletters/news/2015/10/interdisciplinary-training. Consultation date: 20/11/2019.
KOO, Gene. 2007. New skills, new learning: legal education and the promise of new technology. Berkman Center Research Publication. Available online. In: https://ssrn.com/abstract=976646. Consultation date: 05/11/2019.
LAU, Linda. 2000. Distance learning technologies: issues, trends and opportunities. Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing.
MODANI, Loya; DESAI, Vyapak. 2020. Impact of Covid-2019 on contracts: Indian law essentials. India Law Journal. Available online. In: https://www.indialawjournal.org/impact-of-covid-2019-on-contracts.php. Consultation date: 05/11/2019.
O’LAWRENCE, Henry. 2005. “A review of distance learning influences on adult learners: advantages and disadvantages”. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference, pp. 125-135.
RAMY, Herbert. 2013. “Moving students from hearing and forgetting to doing and understanding: a manual for assessment in law school” In: Capital University Law Review. Num. 41, pp. 12-29.
SADEGHI, Manijeh. 2019. “A shift from classroom to distance learning: advantages and limitations”. In: International Journal of Research in English Education. Vol. 4 Num. 1, pp. 80-88.
SANDERS, Thomas. 1908. Twenty talks to teachers. The teachers’ co-operative company. Available online. In: https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/82/twenty-talks-to-teachers/. Consultation date: 05/11/2019.
UPCHURCH, Angela. 2013. Optimizing the law school classroom through the “flipped” classroom model. The Law Teacher. Available online. In: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2325195. Consultation date: 05/11/2019.
WILTHAGEN, Ton; AARTS, Emile; VALCKE, Peggy. 2018. A time for interdisciplinarity. An essay on the added value of collaboration for science, university, and society. Tilburg University. Tilburg, Netherlands.
Copyright
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación donde se presenta el artículo, el cual se publica bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite a otros compartir el trabajo previo el reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y de la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)