Realización del derecho a la libre circulación en las condiciones de cuarentena: práctica del tribunal europeo de derechos humanos

• Anzhelika Krusian Jefe del Departamento de Derecho Constitucional, Administrativo e Internacional del Instituto de Propiedad Intelectual y Derecho de Kiev
• Vadym Tsiura Professor of Civil Law Department of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
• Boris Perezhniak Profesor del Departamento de Derecho Constitucional de la Universidad Nacional "Odesa Law Academy" Honrado Abogado de Ucrania, Académico de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de la Educación Superior de Ucrania
• Roman Sabodash Profesor adjunto del Departamento de Derecho Civil de la Universidad Nacional Taras Shevchenko de Kiev
• Lyudmila Kazakova Profesor asociado del Departamento de Política Internacional de la Universidad Nacional de Uzhorod

Palabras clave: realización de los derechos humanos, práctica del TEDH, libertad de movimiento, inviolabilidad personal, pandemia de COVID-19

Resumen

En condiciones de incertidumbre, la introducción de un estado de emergencia y medidas de cuarentena, el alcance de los derechos humanos puede estar sujeto a la interferencia del Estado y algunos derechos no pueden ejercerse en absoluto. El trabajo tiene como objetivo estudiar el problema del ejercicio del derecho a la libertad de circulación y la integridad personal en el contexto del COVID-19 a través de la práctica del Tribunal europeo de derechos humanos TEDH. El tema del estudio son las relaciones sociales que surgen en el ejercicio del derecho a la libertad de movimiento y la integridad personal en la pandemia de COVID-19. Los métodos de investigación son el método dialéctico, el método de análisis de sistemas, síntesis, inducción, deducción, modelado, comparación, generalización y formalización. Como resultado del estudio, se analizaron los problemas de la realización del derecho a la libertad de movimiento y la inviolabilidad personal en COVID-19 a través del prisma de las decisiones del TEDH. Se aclaró la experiencia internacional de regular el derecho a la circular en condiciones de cuarentena y se sugirieron formas de solucionar este problema para resguardo de la dignidad humana.

Citas

BUCHKIVSKA, Vladyslava. 2013. “Restrictions on individual liberty and inviolability in criminal proceedings: a new criminal procedure law taking into account the case law of the European Court of Human Rights” In: Scientific notes of Lviv University of Business and Law. Vol. 10, pp. 153-158. Available online. In: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nzlubp_2013_10_36. Consultation date: 11/08/2019.

CHERVONENKO, Vitalii. 2020. Quarantine in Ukraine: do the new prohibitions of the Constitution contradict it? BBC. Available online. In: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-52186556. Consultation date: 20/05/2020.

DROZDOV, Oleksander. 2020. Covid-19 and human rights: ECtHR criteria. ECHR: Ukrainian Aspect. Available online. In: https://www.echr.com.ua/covid-19-ta-prava-lyudini-kriteri%D1%97-yespl/. Consultation date: 11/04/2020.
EGOROVA, Anna. 2020. Covid-19 mobilizes: how civil society adapts to change. Media Detector. Available online. In: https://detector.media/infospace/article/177382/2020-05-22-covid-19-mobilizue-yak-gromadyanske-suspilstvo-adaptuetsya-do-zmin/. Consultation date: 20/04/2020.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1976. Engel and others v. The Netherlands: Judgment Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-57479&filename=001-57479.pdf&TID=yolhnfsryr. Consultation date: 01/10/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1979. Winterwerp v. The Netherlands: Judgment. Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf?library=ECHR&id=001-73578&filename=WINTERWERP%20v.%20THE%20NETHERLANDS.pdf. Consultation date: 01/10/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2005. Enhorn v. Sweden: Judgment. Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-113629&filename=001-113629.pdf&TID=thkbhnilzk. Consultation date: 01/10/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2008. Yeloyev v. Ukraine: Judgment. Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-77201&filename=001-77201.pdf. Consultation date: 20/09/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2009. Kuimov v. The Russian Federation: Judgment. Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-80945&filename=001-80945.pdf&TID=ihgdqbxnfi. Consultation date: 25/11/2019.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2010. Garkavyy v. Ukraine: Judgment. Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-97425&filename=001-97425.pdf&TID=ihgdqbxnfi. Consultation date: 11/08/2019.

GOOGLE. 2020. Find out how people move around the city amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Available online. In: https://www.google.com/covid19/mobility/. Consultation date: 07/06/2020.

ICPS: INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES. 2020. How to Fight Covid-19 in the World: options for government decisions. Available online. In: http://icps.com.ua/yak-boryutsya-z-covid-19-u-sviti-varianty-uryadovykh-rishen/. Consultation date: 07/06/2020.

KHARYTONOV, Evgen; KHARYTONOVA, Olena; KHARYTONOVA, Tetiana; KOLODIN, Denis; TOLMACHEVSKA, Yuliia. 2019. “Human rights as the basic value of the concept of private law in modern Europe” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol 8. No. 20, pp. 477-485.

KOKHANOVSKA, Olena. 2015. “Problems of realization of the right to freedom of movement in Ukraine and the practice of the European Court” In: Journal of Civilization. Vol. 18, pp. 157-163. Available online. In: http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/8370. Consultation date: 20/09/2019.

KRAVETS, Rostislav. 2020. Interference in human rights during a pandemic. Protocol. Available online. In: https://protocol.ua/ua/vtruchannya_v_prava_lyudini_pid_chas_pandemii/. Consultation date: 20/05/2020.

MYSHCHAK, Ivan. 2020. “The legality of the introduction of quarantine in Ukraine, or the question of compliance of restrictive measures with constitutional guarantees for the protection of citizens' rights” In: Constitutional process in Ukraine: political and legal aspects. Vol. 4 (72), pp. 3–9. Available online. In: http://nbuviap.gov.ua/images/konstutyciynuy_proces/2020/4.pdf. Consultation date: 25/01/2020.

SHUTKO, Viktoriia. 2020. Coronavirus in Ukraine: everything you need to know, including the law No. 3219. Protocol. Available online. In: https://protocol.ua/ua/koronavirus_v_ukraini_vse_shcho_vam_neobhidno_znati/. Consultation date: 11/06/2020.

SUKMANOVA, Olena; POZYCHANYUK, Kuzma; ZAYETS, Zhanna. 2020. Strengthening quarantine measures: restriction of free movement of citizens. EBA. Available online. In: https://eba.com.ua/posylennya-karantynnyh-zahodiv-obmezhennya-vilnogo-peresuvannya-gromadyan/. Consultation date: 19/04/2020.

UKRAINE LAW. 2006. On the implementation of decisions and application of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights: Law 3477-IV. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15. Consultation date: 25/09/2020.

UKRAINE. 2003. On freedom of movement and free choice of place of residence in Ukraine: Law 1382-IV. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1382-15#Text. Consultation date: 07/09/2020.

UKRAINE. 2018. On National Security of Ukraine: Law 2469-VIII. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2469-19#Text. Consultation date: 19/08/2019.

UKRAINE. 2020. On the establishment of quarantine to prevent the spread of acute respiratory disease COVID-19 caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in Ukraine and the stages of mitigation of anti-epidemic measures: Resolution 392. Available online. In: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-vstanovlennya-karantinu-z-metoyu-zapobigannya-poshirennyu-na-teritoriyi-ukrayini-gostroyi-respiratornoyi-hvorobi-covid-19-sprichinenoyi-koronavirusom-sars-cov-i200520-392/. Consultation date: 07/09/2020.

UKRAINE. CABINET OF MINISTERS. 2020. On prevention of the spread of coronavirus Covid-19 on the territory of Ukraine: Resolution 211. Available online. In: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-vnesennya-zmin-do-postanovi-kabinetu-ministriv-ukrm020420ayini-vid-11-bereznya-2020-r-211. Consultation date: 20/06/2020.

UKRAINE. CONSTITUTION. 1996. Law, no. 254k / 96-VR. Revision of September 30, 2016, grounds – 1401-19. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80. Consultation date: 19/08/2019.

UKRAINE. LAW. 2000. On protection of the population from infectious diseases, no. 1645-III. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1645-14. Consultation date: 25/11/2019.

UNITED NATIONS. 1950. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Available online. In: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf. Consultation date: 07.10.2019.

UNITED NATIONS. 1963. Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c. Consultation date: 25/10/2019.

VLASENKO, Viktoriia. 2020. Kyiv did not limit the Convention on Human Rights due to the epidemic. Available online. In: https://www.dw.com/uk/kyiv-ne-obmezhuvav-diiu-konventsii-z-prav-liudyny-cherez-epidemiiu/a-53023831. Consultation date: 20/04/2020.