The Influence of the Coalition Approach in US Policy on the Integration Processes in Europe in the Post-Bipolar Era

• Olha Y. Kravchuk Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-1934
• Volodymyr I. Zabolotnyuk Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8195-9974
• Yuliia V. Kobets Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9492-6119
• Oksana I. Lypchuk Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-6761
• Ivanna I. Lomaka Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-7016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.09

Palabras clave: enfoque de coalición, relaciones internacionales, era post bipolar, integración política, geopolítica

Resumen

El artículo examina el impacto del enfoque de coalición en la política estadounidense sobre los procesos de integración en Europa en la era post bipolar. El objetivo de este artículo fue identificar las peculiaridades de la situación política en el mundo después de un período de escalada del conflicto nuclear. Implicó un análisis de fuentes en el campo de la investigación del enfoque de coalición en los Estados Unidos, así como una comparación de su impacto en la situación política y la legislación de la Unión Europea. Se concluyó que hay una falta de investigación adecuada en el campo del impacto del enfoque de coalición en la política estadounidense en la era post bipolar y su impacto en los procesos de integración en Europa. Al comparar la experiencia de la UE y los EE. UU., se determinó que la conciencia del peligro nuclear afectó el desarrollo de un enfoque de coalición en la política estadounidense. El estudio dio como resultado los aspectos específicos identificados de la política de seguridad de la UE bajo la influencia del enfoque de la coalición estadounidense, donde la necesidad de garantizar la estabilidad y la seguridad armada es crucial.

Citas

BACCARINI, Mariana Pimenta Oliveira. 2018. “Informal reform of the United Nations security council” In: Contexto Internacional. Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 97-115.

BIALASIEWICZ, Luiza; CAMPBELL, David; ELDEN, Stuart; GRAHAM, Stephen; JEFFREY, Alex; WILLIAMS, Alison J. 2007. “Performing security: the imaginative geography of current US strategy” In: Political Geography Vol. 26, pp. 405-422.

BROOKS, Stephen G; WOHLFORTH, William C. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton University Press. Princeton, USA.

DAGUERRE, Anne. 2020. “Policy styles and welfare reform in Britain and the USA: The conservative-led coalition government and the Obama administration compared” In: Journal of Social Security Law. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 130-158.

EUROPEAN UNION. 2012. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 2012/C 326/. Available online. In: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT. Consultation date: 28/01/2021.

FARD, Rebin. 2019. “The new foreign policy pendulum: Geopolitical codes of German foreign policy in the post bipolar world order” In: Politics in Central Europe. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 383‬-418.

FERGUSON, Yale H. 2008. “Approaches to defining “empire” and characterizing United States influence in the contemporary world” In: International Studies Perspectives. Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 272–280.

FESENKO, Mykola Vasylyovych. 2017. “Phenomenon of postglobalization in the context of a new international order formation” In: Bulletin of Mariupol State University. Series: History. Political Studies. Vol. 19, pp. 266-274.

FLOCKHART, Trine. 2014. Post-bipolar challenges. New visions and new activities. In: Sebastian Mayer (Ed.), NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics: NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics. New Security Challenges Series (pp. 71- 88). Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

GLEBOV, Sergiy. 2014. The beginning of Ukraine and the end of the post- bipolar world. In: Viktor Stepanenko and Yaroslav Pylynskyi (Eds.) Ukraine after Euromaidan: Challenges and Hopes (pp. 105-114). Peter Lang. Bern, Switzerland.

GLEBOV, Sergiy. 2019. The EU’s policy of integration in the context of European regionalization. Olga Brusylovska, and Igor Koval, (Eds.), Prospects of Development in EU Politics: Global and Regional Dimentions (pp. 20- 32). Odesa Mechnikov National University Press. Odesa, Ukraine.

IGNATOV, Ivan Alekseevich. 2020. “Japanese-Mongolian relations in the post- bipolar period within the context of Mongolia’s “third neighbor” policy” In: Japanese Studies in Russia. Vol. 1, pp. 69-84.

KONONENKO, Serhiy Volodymyrovych, 2018. “The war in the international politics: technology, culture, organizing” In: Scientific Notes of the Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Vol. 41, pp. 53-63.

MAJINGE, Charles Riziki. 2011. “Regional arrangements and the maintenance of international peace and security: the role of the African Union peace and security council” In: Canadian Yearbook of International Law. Vol. 48, pp. 97-149.

MARSHANIA, Zurab. 2011. “The phenomenon of post-bipolar regionalism in Europe” In: The Caucasus & Globalization. Vol. 5, No. 1-2, pp. 23-34.

MARTIN, Lisa L; SIMMONS, Beth A. 1998. “Theories and empirical studies of international institutions” In: International Organization. Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 729-757.

MAYER, Sebastian. 2014. Introduction: NATO as an organization and bureaucracy. In: Sebastian Mayer (Ed.), NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics. New Security Challenges Series (pp. 1-27). Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

MCLAUGHLIN, Danielle M; CUTTS, Bethany B. 2018. “Neither knowledge deficit nor NIMBY: Understanding opposition to hydraulic fracturing as a nuanced coalition in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania (USA)” In: Environmental Management. Vol. 62, pp. 305–322.

MISHRA, Vinod K; VERMA, Dinesh C; WILLIAMS, Christopher. 2017 Improving security in coalition tactical environments using an SDN approach. In: Shao Ying Zhu, Sandra Scott-Hayward, Ludovic Jacquin and Richard Hill (Eds.), Guide to Security in SDN and NFV. Computer Communications and Networks (pp 273-298). Springer. Cham.

MORAVCSIK, Andrew. 1997. “Taking preferences seriously: a liberal theory of international politics” In: International Organization. Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 513-553.

OGUNBANJO, Martin Abimbola. 2021. “Neo-realism and neo-liberalism in global politics: towards assessing the intellectual siblings” In: KIU Journal of Social Sciences, Suppl. l, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 57-76.

PIREN, Mariya Ivanivna. 2000. Conflict and Management Roles. Socio- Psychological Analysis. Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Kyiv, Ukraine.

PRANTL, Jochen. 2005. “Informal groups of states and the UN security council” In: International Organization. Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 559-592.

RUDKO, Serhiy Oleksiyovych. 2012. Foreign Policy of Western European Countries during Post-Bipolar Period. Textbook for the Course. Publishing House of Ostroh Academy National University. Ostroh, Ukraine.

SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. 2004. International law and international relations theory: A prospectus. In: Eyal Benvenisti and Moshe Hirsch (Eds.), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 16-49). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. SUBOTIN, Andriy. 2019. “Future of US hegemony” In: Actual Problems of International Relations. Vol. 139, pp. 4-12.

TELÒ, Mario. 2010. International Relations: A European Perspective, 1st edition. Routledge. London, UK.

VAKARCHUK, Kateryna Vasylivna. 2018. “Argentina’s foreign policy in the post-bipolar period” In: Odesa National University Herald. Series: Sociology and Political Sciences. Vol. 23, No. 2(31), pp. 115-127.

VENTURA, Carla Aparecida Arena; CAVALCANTI, Melissa Franchini; DE PAULA, Verônica Angélica Freitas. 2006. “The systems approach to the pluralist theory of international relations: a case study of the European Union” In: Systemic Practice and Action Research. Vol. 19, pp. 475–487.

VOLODINA, Maryna Oleksandrivna. 2012. “NATO in the in the system of dominant foreign policy priorities of the United States and Great Britain in the 1990s” In: Istorychni Zapysky. Vol. 35, pp. 24-32.

WEIBLE, Christopher M; JENKINS-SMITH, Hank C. 2016. The advocacy coalition framework: an approach for the comparative analysis of contentious policy issues. In: B. Guy Peters and Philippe Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy (pp. 15-34). Palgrave Macmillan. London, UK.

ZARTMAN, William (Ed.). 2009. Imbalance of Power: US Hegemony and International Order. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Boulder, USA.