Russian court in adversarial criminal procedures

• Erna Kaysynovna Batchaeva Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-7241
• Daria Olegovna Chistilina Southwest State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7902-3261
• Aleksandr Viktorovich Grinenko Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-2714
• Tatyana Kimovna Ryabinina Southwest State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0770-6802
• Vasiliy Jonovich Potapov Pitirim Sorokin Syktyvkar State University (SyktSU) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3150-088X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.30

Palabras clave: sistema adversarial, juez presidente, enjuiciamiento, defensa, investigación judicial

Resumen

Este artículo analiza el papel del tribunal ruso en los procedimientos penales acusatorios. En los planos legislativo y práctico, existe incertidumbre sobre el grado de actividad judicial en relación con la cuestión de la prueba. El modelo teórico del sistema acusatorio supone que existe una mínima intervención judicial en las diligencias de investigación de las partes. Estos últimos deben tomar medidas y defender su posición en el caso penal. Se supone que el tribunal debe tener una postura pasiva. La base metodológica de este estudio está compuesta por métodos científicos y jurídicos generales como los métodos dialécticos,  históricos, sistemáticos, jurídicos comparativos, formales-lógicos, etc. La mayoría de los países que practican un modelo acusatorio de justicia penal otorgan al tribunal un cierto nivel de acción que le permite participar plenamente en la prueba durante los juicios. A modo de conclusión se sugiere mejorar las  capacidades del tribunal ruso para investigar activamente las pruebas, así como para ofrecer nuevas formas  de defensa a las partes.

Citas

ANDREEVA, Olga, I; ZAITSEV, Oleg A; EMELYANOV, Dmitry V. 2017. “On the abuse of the right to defense by the defender and how officials react to bad faith” In: Criminal Justice. No. 10, pp. 19-24.

AZAROV, Vladimir Alexandrovich. 2019. “Destructive factors of the strategy of development of criminal procedural legislation of Russia” In: Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Right. No. 33, pp. 49-59.

AZAROVA, Ekaterina Sergeevna. 2018. “Algorithm of discretion of the court and the resolution of petitions in criminal proceedings” In: Scientific notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Legal sciences. No. 2, pp. 101-108.

BARANOVA, Evgeniya Vladimirovna. 2013. “Modern legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the relationship between the adversarial principle and the activity of the court in criminal proceedings” In: Criminal Justice. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 21-23.

BUNDESRECHT KONSOLIDIERT: GESAMTE RECHTSVORSCHRIFT FÜR STRAFPROZE ßORDNUNG. 1975. Available online. In: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen& Gesetzesnummer=10002326. Date of consultation: 12/11/2020.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN NO. 2013 – XII. September 22. 1994. Information retrieval and expert systems “All legislation of Uzbekistan”. Available online. In: https://lex. uz/docs/111463. Date of consultation: 12/11/2020.

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE. DECEMBER 1. 2014. United States Courts, Washington. Available online. In: https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Rules%20of%20Evidence. Date of consultation: 16/11/2020.

GOLOVKO, Leonid Vitalievich. 2016. “The influence of the professional status of the court on the degree of its activity in criminal proceedings” In: Law. No. 1, pp. 27-38.

GRINENKO, Alexander Viktorovich. 2016. “Correlation of the concepts “court” and “judge” in the Russian criminal procedure legislation” In: Russian judge. No. 9, pp. 25-29.

IVANOV, Dmitriy Aleksandrovich; ESINA, Alla Sergeevna; FADEEV, Pavel Vladimirovich; CHASOVNIKOVA, Olga Georgievna; ZORINA, Elena Andreevna. 2020. “Crime victim compensation” In: Revista Gênero e Direito. Vol. 9, No. 4, pр. 753-759.

IVANOV, Dmitriy Aleksandrovich; FADEEV, Pavel Vladimirovich; ALIMAMEDOV, Elmir Nizamievich; DUNG, Vo Kim. 2020. “Provision of the rights and legitimate interests of legal entities that have been victims of crimes” In: Revista Turismo Estudos & Práticas. Vol. S5, pp. 1-7.

KARJAKIN, Evgeny Alexandrovich. 2016. “The purpose and burden of proof in relation to the formation of judicial truth in a criminal case in the court of first instance”, In: Russian judge. No. 5, pp. 22-26.

KHALDEEV, Lev Semenovich. 2000. Judge in criminal proceedings: Practical guideю Yurayt, Moscow, Russia.

KOZYAVIN, Andrey Alexandrovich, CHISTILINA, Daria Olegovna. 2016.,Civil control and civil assistance in criminal proceedings of Russia: pro et contra, In: SGEM Conference Social science and Arts. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Albena, Bulguria, pp. 547-554.

KOZYAVIN, Andrey Alexandrovich; CHEBOTAREVA, Anna Aleksandrovna. 2015. “Evidential Powers of Defense Counsel in Criminal Proceedings of Russia in Context of Theory, Law and Practice Disconnection” In: SGEM Conference Social science and Arts. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Albena, Bulguria, pp. 553-560.

KUDRYAVTSEVA, A.V; SYSKOV, V.L. 2007. Evidence-based activity of the court of first instance in criminal cases. Yurlitinform, Moscow, Russia.

LUTSENKO, P.A. 2019. “Forms of the implementation of judicial power in criminal proceedings in the context of the procedural status of the court as a participant in the criminal process” In: Penitentiary Science. No. 3, pp. 376-385.

PIYUK, Alexey Valerievich. 2017. “On the question of the role of the court in proving in the modern criminal process of the Russian Federation” In: Criminal Justice. No. 9, pp. 42-45.

PLASHEVSKAYA, Anastasia Anatolyevna. 2006. Collection of evidence by courts when considering a case at first instance in the criminal process of Russia. Publishing house of scientific and technical literature. Tomsk, Russia.

PUSHKAREV, Viktor Victorovich; GAEVOY, Alexander Ivanovich; KOLCHURIN, Andrei Gennadievich; BUKHAROV, Nikolay Nikolaevich; PCHOLOVSKY, Nikolay Kazimirovich. 2021. “Ensuring the principle of adversarial parties by the investigator at the end of the criminal prosecution” In: Laplage em Revista (International). Vol.7, No. Extra A, pp. 304-310.

REGULATIONS ON THE PEOPLE’S COURT OF THE RSFSR. October 21. 1920. Available online. In: https://pravo.ru/store/doc/doc/ESU18782_ 0_20140421_141452_53397.pdf. Date of consultation: 16/11/2020.

SENKINA, Zhanna Sergeevna. 2013. “On the content of the concept of “Court activity” at various stages of the development of criminal proceedings” In: Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 23, pp. 209-212.

SHARAFUTDINOVA, Zarina Igorevna. 2014. “On the formation of an internal conviction of a judge in an adversarial criminal procedure” In: Fundamentals of Economics, Management and Law. Vol. 2, No. 14, pp. 93-95.

STROGOVICH, Mikhail Solomonovich. 1957. “On inquiry and preliminary investigation and on a single investigative apparatus” In: Socialist legality. No. 5, pp. 54-78.

THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN NO. 231-V. JULY 4. 2014. Information and legal system of normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available online. In: http:// adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1400000231. Date of consultation: 16/11/2020.

THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN. DECEMBER 3. 2009. National Center for Legislation under the President of the Republic of Tajikistan: official website. Available online. In: http:// ncz.tj/content/%20the%20criminal-%20procedural-code%20of%20 the%20republic-tajikistan. Date of consultation: 28/09/2020.

TRUBNIKOVA, Tatiana Vladimirovna. 2013. “The beginning of the impartiality of the court in the criminal process of the Russian Federation: undeserved neglect” In: Criminal Justice. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 51-55.

YAKIMOVICH, Yuri Konstantinovich. 2015. Participants in the criminal process. Legal Center. Saint Petersburg, Russia.