Phylogenetic and bottleneck analysis of the Turkish Arabian and Thoroughbred horse populations

• Cevdet Yaralı Veterinary Control Central Research Institute, Genetics Laboratory, Ankara, Türkiye
• Abdurrahman Köseman Malatya Turgut Ozal University, Akcadag Vocational School, Department of Crop and Animal Production. Malatya, Türkiye
• Yusuf Özşensoy Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Genetics. Sivas, Türkiye https://orcid.org/
• İbrahim Şeker Firat University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Zootechny. Elazig, Türkiye
• Burhan Toprak Yozgat Bozok University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy. Yozgat, Türkiye https://orcid.org/
• Kemal Zengin Veterinary Control Central Research Institute, Genetics Laboratory, Ankara, Türkiye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e33262

Keywords: Arabian horse, bottleneck, microsatellite, phylogenetic analysis, thoroughbred horse

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the phylogenetic and bottleneck analyses of Turkish Thoroughbred and Arabian horse populations. In the study, genotyping was performed using a total of 17 microsatellite markers in the samples taken from 959 Thoroughbred and 813 Arabian horses. The average effective allele number in Arabian horses was 3.338 and the average number of alleles was 7.412 in Thorougbred horses. Genetic distance and genetic identity between Thoroughbred and Arabian breeds was 0.411 and 0.663, respectively. Also genetic identity in each Arabian and Thoroughbred horse populations was 1.000. The FCA table showed that the two breeds were completely separated from each other and were compatible. In conclusion; the bottlenecks of Thoroughbred and Arabian horse populations were in a normal L distribution and these horse breeds do not appear to have succumbed to introgression. Therefore, they are not yet at risk of extinction any time soon.

References

Pirault P, Danvy S, Verrier E, Leroy G. Genetic structure and gene flows within horses: a genealogical study at the french population scale. PLoS One. 2013; 22(4):e61544.

Thiruvenkadan AK, Kandasamy N, Panneerselvam S. Inheritance of racing performance of Thoroughbred horses. Livest. Sci. 2009; 121:308–326.

Cunningham EP, Dooley JJ, Splan RK, Bradley DG. Microsatellite diversity, pedigree relatedness and the contributions of founder lineages to Thoroughbred horses. Anim. Genet. 2001; 32(6):360–4.

Buróczıová M, Řıha J. Horse breed discrimination using machine learning methods. J. Appl. Genet. 2009; 50(4):375–377.

Özşensoy Y, Kurar E. Markör sistemleri ve genetik karakterizasyon çalışmalarında kullanımları. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2012; 10(2):11–19.

Takezaki N, Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genet. 1996; 144(1):389–99.

General Statistics [Internet]. Istanbul: Türkiye Jockey Club. 2022 [Accessed 19 March 2023]. Available in: https://bit.ly/3rfOk2D.

Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioin App Note. 2012; 28(19):2537–2539.

Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations [Internet]. Montpellier: Université Montpellier II; 2004 [Accessed 19 March 2023]. Available in: https://bit.ly/3pCQzMQ.

Langella O. Populations 1.2.32 population genetic software [Internet]. 2011; [Accessed 19 March 2023]. Available in: https://bit.ly/3XJqloG.

Piry S, Luikard G, Cornuet JM. Bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J. Hered. 1999; 90(4):502–503.

Raymond M, Rousset F. Genepop (version 1.2): population–genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. 1995; J. Hered. 86:248–9.

Almarzook S, Abdel–Shafy H, Ahmed AS, Reissmann M, Brockmann GA. Genetic diversity of Arabian horses using microsatellite markers. Egyptian J. Anim. Prod. 2022; 59(1):19–27.

Machmoum M, Boujenane I, Azelhak R, Badaoui B, Petit D, Piro M. Genetic diversity and population structure of Arabian horse populations using microsatellite markers. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020; 93:103200.

Cosenza M, La Rosa V, Rosati R, Chiofalo V. Genetic diversity of the Italian Thoroughbred horse population. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019; 18(1):538–545.

Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000; 88 p.

Mahrous KF, Hassanane M, Abdel–Mordy M, Heba I, Shafey HI, Hassan N. Genetic variations in horse using microsatellite markers. JGEB. 2011; 9(2):103–109.

Jung JS, Seong J, Lee GH, Kim Y, An JH, Yun JH, Kong HS. Genetic diversity and relationship of Halla horse based on polymorphisms in microsatellites. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021; 36:76–81.

Cosgrove EJ, Sadeghi R, Schlamp F, Holl HM, Moradi–Shahrbabak M, Miraei–Ashtiani SR, Abdalla S, Shykiind B, Troedsson M, Stefaniuk–Szmukier M, Prabhu A, Bucca S, Bugno–Poniewierska M, Wallner B, Malek J, Miller DC, Clark AG, Antczak DF, Brooks SA. Genome diversity and the origin of the Arabian horse. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):9702.

Duru, S. Pedigree analysis of the Turkish Arab horse population: structure, inbreeding and genetic variability. Anim. 2017; 11(9):1449–1456.

Todd ET, Ho SY, Thomson PC, Ang RA, Velie BD, Hamilton Na. Founder–specific inbreeding depression affects racing performance in Thoroughbred horses. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8(1):6167.

Zabek T, Zyga A, Radko A, Słota E. Analysis of genetic variation in Małopolski horses using molecular and pedigree data. Nat. Res. Instit. Anim. Prod. 2006; 6(1):13–27.

Próchniak T, Kasperek K, Knaga S, Rozempolska–Rucińska I, Batkowska J, Drabik K, Ziȩba G. Pedigree analysis of Warmblood horses participating in competitions for young horses. Front. Genet. 2021; 12:658403.

Koseman A, Ozsensoy Y, Erdogan M, Yarali Y, Toprak B, Zengin K, Seker I. Investigation of genetic variations using microsatellite markers in Colored horses in Turkey. Russ. J. Genet. 2020; 56 (5):592–602.