El constitucionalismo estadounidense y la nación de mediados del siglo XIX
Abstract
The authors of the article have studied the causes of the American Civil War with due regard to the history of constitutional law. This research is based on several political, economic, legal and cultural factors. The authors used the method of analyzing historical documents. After analyzing judicial precedents and global historical trends, they have concluded that America’s constitutional institutes lost their effectiveness and became a weapon in the hands of struggling parties during the constitutional crisis. As a result, the compromise system of the early nineteenth century became a new state and legal structure.
Downloads
References
CAMPBELL, Stanley. 1970. The slave catchers: enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law, 1850-1860. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. NC., USA.
CARLISLE, Rodney P. 2008. Civil war and reconstruction. Infobase Publishing. New York, USA.
CHEMERINSKY, Erwin. 2015. Constitutional law: principles and policies. Wolters Kluwer. New York, USA.
FEHRENBACHER, Don E. 1997. The Dred Scott case: its significance in American law and politics. Oxford University Publishing. Oxford, UK.
GOLDSTEIN, Leslie Friedman. 2011. “A ‘Triumph of freedom’ after all? Prigg v. Pennsylvania re-examined” In: Law and History Review. Vol. 29, pp. 763-796.
HURD, John. 1968. Law of freedom and bondage in the United States. Little Brown and Company. Boston, MA.
HUSTON, James L. 2003. Calculating the value of the union: slavery, property rights, and the economic origins of the civil war. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC., USA.
KACZOROWSKI, Robert J. 1986. “Revolutionary constitutionalism in the era of the civil war and reconstruction” In: New York University Law Review. Vol. 61, pp. 863-940.
KETTNER, James. 1978. The development of American citizenship, 1608-1870. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.
LOCKLEY, Fred. 1922. “The case of Robin Holmes vs. Nathaniel Ford” In: The Quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 111-137.
MCCLINTOCK, Russell. 2008. Lincoln and the decision for war: the northern response to secession. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. NC., USA.
MOUNTJOY, Shane. 2009. Causes of the civil war: the differences between the North and South. Infopress Publishing. New York, USA.
NADELHAFT, Jerome. 1966. “The Somersett case and slavery: myth, reality, and repercussions” In: Journal of Negro History. Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 193- 208.
SCHWARTZ, Bernard. 1997. A book of legal lists: the best and worst in American law. Oxford University Publishing. Oxford, UK.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. 1842. Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S.(16 Pet.) 539 (1842). Library of Congress. Available online. In: http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep041/usrep041539/usrep041539.pdf. Consultation date: 10/12/2020.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. 1857. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857). Library of Congress. Available online. In: http:// cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep060/usrep060393/usrep060393. pdf. Consultation date: 10/12/2020.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. 1859. Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506 (1859). Library of Congress. Available online. In: http://cdn. loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep062/usrep062506/usrep062506.pdf. Consultation date: 10/12/2020.
VARON, Elizabeth R. 2008. Disunion: the coming of the American Civil War, 1789-1859. The University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. NC., USA.
WIECEK, William. 1977. The sources of antislavery Constitutionalism in America 1760-1848. Cornell University Press. Ithaca and London. NY, USA.
Copyright
The authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication where the article is presented, which is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work prior to the recognition of the authorship of the article work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors may separately establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This work is under license:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)