Problematic aspects of the serving of sentences by specific groups of convicted persons

Aspectos problemáticos del cumplimiento de las penas por grupos específicos de condenados

• Serhii Hrechaniuk State Penal Enforcement Service of Ukraine, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-9523
• Yurii Shchyhol National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7621-0616
• Larysa Udalova National Academy of Internal Affairs, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-5902
• Oksana Khablo National Academy of Internal Affairs, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3923-275X
• Vitalii Terekhov Lawyer, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1923-8302

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.34

Keywords: court decision, classification of convicts, penitentiary institution, social and educational impact, serving a sentence

Abstract

The objective of the article was to analyze problematic aspects of the execution of the sentence by certain groups of prisoners. The research methodology includes hermeneutics, formal and logical method, dogmatic method, synergistic method, system method and generalization method. In the proceedings of the investigation, the terms «serving a sentence» and «serving a sentence» are revealed and their differences are determined. The bodies of execution of sentences and their classification are considered. It clarifies the opinions of scientists on the classification of convicts, provides legislative consolidation of groups of convicted on various grounds (age, sex, severity of crime, recidivism, recidivism, illness). Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on improper detentions analyzed. The main problematic aspects of the execution of the sentence by certain groups of prisoners, such as men, women, minors and tuberculosis patients, are presented. In the practical signified investigation, they identify some problematic issues that arise during the serving of sentences by certain groups of prisoners.

References

BILYY V. UKRAINE, APPLICATIONS № 11356/17 AND 45420/19. 2022. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights, 13 January 2022. Available online. In: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/ES071877. Consultation date: 13/01/2022.

CASE MOUISEL V. FRANCE, APPLICATION NO. 67263/01. 2003. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Available online. In: https:// policehumanrightsresources.org/mouisel-v-france-application- no-67263-01. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

CASE OF DYKUSARENKO V. UKRAINE, APPLICATIONS NO. 7218/19 AND 17854/19. 2020. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_ e95#Text. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

CASE OF MELNIK V. UKRAINE, APPLICATION NO. 72286/01. 2006. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_049#Text%20%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82%20104. Consultation
date: 15/11/2021.

CASE OF MURŠIĆ V. CROATIA, APPLICATION № 7334/13. 2013. Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. Available online. In: https:// policehumanrightsresources.org/mursic-v-croatia-application- no-7334-13. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. 2006. Recommendation Rec (2006)2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the European Prison Rules. Available online. In: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805d8d25. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

LAW OF UKRAINE NO. 1129-IV. 2003. Penal Enforcement Code of Ukraine, Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, 11 July, 2003. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1129- 15#Text. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

LAW OF UKRAINE NO. 2341-III. 2001. Criminal Code of Ukraine, Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine.

OHNIEVA, Valentina; OHNIEVA, Elena. 2011. Legal culture as a factor for effective protection of citizens’ rights in modern Russia. Education and Society, No. 1, pp. 4 – 6. Available online. In: https://www.elibrary.ru/ item.asp?id=18901524. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

ORDER OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF UKRAINE AND MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF UKRAINE NO. 1348/5/572. 2014. On the approval of the Procedure for the Organization of Medical Assistance to Prisoners of Deprivation of Liberty. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ z0990-14#Text. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

ORDER OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF UKRAINE NO. 2823/5. 2018. On the approval of the internal regulations of penal institutions. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1010-18#Text. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

ORDER OF THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OF UKRAINE № 680/5. 2017. On approval of the Procedure for determining the type of penitentiary institution; life imprisonment, arrest, restriction of liberty and their transfer, Regulations on the Central and Interregional Commission for Determining the Type of Institution for Execution of Sentences, Place of Sentence, Persons Sentenced to Term, Life Imprisonment, Arrest and Restriction of freedom, their direction and transfer for serving a sentence. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0265- 17#top. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE NO. 631/2012. 2012. Concept of State Policy in the Sphere of Reforming the State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine. Recovered from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/631/2012#Text. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

ORDER OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF SENTENCES No. 33. 2000. Regulation on the psychological service of penal institution, Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine. Available online. In: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/ v0033325-00#Text. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

PRYIMACHENKO, Olesia; ALLA, Babii; SHNAREVYCH, Olena; PAVLENKO, Olena; RAKHLIS, Vadym. 2021. “Emotional Intelligence Vs Normative Behavior of Juvenile Male Convicts” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 10, No. 45, pp. 131-40.

RAZGILDIEV, B.T; NASIROV, N.I. 2019. “The Penal Nature of the Punishment and Its Purpose”. In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 8, No. 21, pp. 261-275.

REZNICHENKO, Hanna. 2009. Peculiarities of fufillment and serving punishment in the kind of imprisonment by convicted women. PhD Dissertation. Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs. Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine.

SARYCHEVA, Nataliia. 2017. “Problems of resocialization and adaptation of women sentenced to deprivation of liberty” In: Gazette of the North Caucasus Federal University. No. 3, pp. 350 – 351.

SHABLYSTYI, Volodymyr. 2018. Penal Enforcement Law: practical guide. Bila K.O. Dnipro, Ukraine.

SHMAROV, Ihor; MELENTIEV, Mikhail. 1971. Differentiation in the enforcement of sentences in corrective labour establishments. Perm Regional Executive Committee. Perm, Russia.

STADNIK, Volodymyr. 2017. “Execution of penalty as deprivation of freedom in regard to juvenile delinquents”. PhD Dissertation. The National University «Lviv Polytechnics». Lviv, Ukraine.

STRUCHKOV, Nikolai. 1985. Course on corrective labour law. Problems of special part. Legal Literature. Мoscow, Russia.

TAVOLZHANSKYI, Oleksii. 2015. Social and educational work with convicts: monograph. Pravo. Kharkiv, Ukraine.

UN OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME. 2015. The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). Available online. In: https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice- and-prison-reform/Nelson_Mandela_Rules-E-ebook.pdf. Consultation date: 15/11/2021.

VASYLYK, Vitalii. 2021. Criminal-executive principles of punishment in the form of imprisonment for a definite term. PhD Dissertation. National Academy of Internal Affairs. Kyiv, Ukraine.