Digital Transformation of Public Administration: Sociocultural forms of organization in education, science and innovation

Transformación Digital de la Administración Pública: Formas socioculturales de organización en educación, ciencia e innovación

• Nataliia Ridei National Pedagogical Drahomanov University, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5553-059X
• Walat Wojciech College of Social Sciences University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3158-1923
• Nataliia Tytova National Pedagogical Drahomanov University, Kyiv. Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9415-4427
• Liydmyla Stepanenko National Pedagogical Drahomanov University, Kyiv. Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5508-2379
• Armen Aleksanian University St. Sichovykh Striltsiv, Lviv. Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-3393

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.50

Keywords: information society, globalization, integration, digital transformation, socioculturalism

Abstract

The article identifies and establishes the main problems in the implementation of the digital transformation of public administration in education, science and innovation, in particular, focuses on the lack of conceptual characterization. The study is due to the lack of foundation of the theoretical and methodological approaches to the digital transformation of public administration. The article shows that the digital transformation of public administration is a requirement of the current times, since the new society is in the process of computerization and dissemination of innovation in different areas. In fact, the need to add public administration in the digital transformation by socio-cultural means as the basis of innovative society in education and science has been corroborated. In the course of our research, we used the method of integration of the synthesis of the structure of the image and the analysis of content, research and descriptive method, the characterization of educational activities in the framework of digital transformation. By way of conclusion, the results of the study confirm that digital transformation is a requirement of the current times and that it is also an unpostponable process.

References

ABUALRUB, Iyad; STENSAKER, Bjørn. 2018. “How are universities responding to demands for an improved learning environment?” In: Journal of Further and Higher Education. Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 721-732.

ALLESSIE, David; SOBOLEWSKI, Maciej; VACCARI, Lorenzino. 2019. Blockchain for digital government. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg, German.

ALLMAN, Bohdana. 2018. “Socioculturalism” In: R. Kimmons, The Students’ Guide to Learning Design and Research. EdTech Books. Available online. In: https://edtechbooks.org/studentguide/socioculturalism. Consultation date: 13/03/2021.

ATZORI, Marcella. 2015. “Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary?” Available online. In: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2709713. Consultation date: 13/03/2021.

BREMERS, Joan; WOUTER, Deleu. 2016. “Towards Faster Implementation and Uptake of Open Government” In: European Commission, pp. 1-50. Available online. In: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/610716. Consultation date: 25/03/2021.

BROWN,Alan; FISHENDEN,Jerry;THOMPSON,Mark;VENTERS,Will.2017. “Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF)” In: Government Information Quarterly. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 167-182.

FLORIDI, Luciano, COWLS, Josh; BELTRAMETTI, Monica; CHATILA, Raja; CHAZERAND, Patrice; DIGNUM, Virginia; LUETGE, Christoph; MADELIN, Robert. 2018. “AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations” In: Minds and Machines. Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 689-707.

GALASSO, Giovanna. 2016.”Analysis of the value of new generation of eGovernment services and how the public sector can become an agent of innovation through ICT.” In: European Commission, Directorate- General of Communications Networks, Content & Technology. Luxembourg, German. Available online. In: https://data.europa.eu/ doi/10.2759/836234. Consultation date: 13/03/2021.

GERTLER, Paul; MARTINEZ, Sebastian; PREMAND, Patrick; RAWLINGS, Laura; VERMEERSCH, Christel. 2016. Impact Evaluation in Practice. Inter-American Development Bank and World Bank. Washington, DC., USA.

KAY, Robert; GOLDSPINK, Chris. 2016. Public Sector innovation: Why it’s different Australian Institute of Company Directors. Available online. In: https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/~/media/cd2/resources/ advocacy/governance-leadership-centre/pdf/05493-1-pol-glc-public- sector-innovation-research-paper-a4-may16_web.ashx. Consultation date: 13/03/2021.

KESHELAVA, Amiran Varlamovich (ed.). 2017. Introduction to Digital Economy. All-Russian Research Institute of Geosystems. Moscow, Russia.

LAPPO, Violetta. 2015. “Spiritual and Value Self-Determination of Student’s Personality in Educational Space of High School. In: Science and Education a New Dimension” Pedagogy and Psychology. Vol. 55, pp. 10–13.

NOONAN, Kevin. 2017. “Cyber security for digital government leaders- A guide for government senior executives responsible for leading digital initiatives” In: Systems, Inc. Available online. In: https://www.cisco. com/c/dam/global/en_sg/assets/pdfs/cisco_whitepaper_govt_cyber_ security_digital_20170504.pdf. Consultation date: 13/03/2021.

OSWALD, Marion. 2018 “Algorithm-assisted decision-making in the public sector: framing the issues using administrative law rules governing discretionary power”. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. Available online. In: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/ rsta.2017.0359. Consultation date: 13/03/2021.

POTAPCHUK, Tetiana; MAKARUK, Olha; KRAVETS, Nadia; ANNENKOVА, Nataliia. 2020. “Professional self-identification of future educators as a form of personal growth” In: Journal of History Culture and Art Research. Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 72-89.

ROKICH, Milton. 1976. The nature of human values and value system. Current Perspectives in Social Psychology. Oxford University Press. New York, USA.

SHAPOSHNYKOVA, Irina Vasylivna. 2015. “Sociocultural Transformations: The Relationship of Tradition and Innovation” In: Sociology. Vol. 4, No. 120, pp. 21–26.

SHULIAKOV, Igor. 2017. “Intercultural interaction and its types” In: Culture of Ukraine. Vol. 1. No. 58, pp. 85-93.

TROSHANI, Indrit; JANSSEN, Marijn; LYMER, Andy; PARKER, Lee. 2018. “Digital Transformation of Business-to-Government Reporting: An Institutional Work Perspective” In: International Journal of Accounting Information Systems Vol. 31, pp. 17-36.

VASIL’EVA, Elena Geral’dovna; KONONENKO, Danil Valer’evich. 2016. Modern interpretations of the concept of electronic state (e-government)” In: Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 5: Jurisprudence. Vol. 1, No. 30, pp. 9–16.

WILLIAMS, Mark; VALAYER, Clementine. 2018. “Digital Government Benchmark Study on Digital Government Transformation” In: European Commission. Luxembourg, German. Available online. In: https://joinup. ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/2018-10/330046042JRC_ DigitalGovernmentBenchmark_FinalReport%20v2.0_DigGovSection. pdf. Consultation date: 13/03/2021.

YAHODZINSKYI, Serhii. 2016. Sociocultural Potential of Global Information Networks (Doctor of Philosophy thesis). Kyiv, Ukraine.

YAKUSHENKO, Ksenija Valentinovna; SHIMANSKAJA, Anastasija Vasil’evna. 2017. “Digital transformation of information management of the economy of EAEU member states” In: News in Science and Technology. Vol. 2, No. 41, pp. 11-20.