The impact of decentralization on the administrative service delivery speed in different fields

El impacto de la descentralización en la velocidad de prestación de servicios administrativos en diferentes campos

Keywords: public administration, decentralization of management, administrative services, local self-government bodies, impact of decentralization

Abstract

Using an analytical and documentary-based methodology, the objective of the study was to establish the relationship between the degree of decentralization and the speed of delivery of administrative services at the local level in different fields in European countries and Ukraine. The study involved indicators of the speed of delivery of administrative services (company registration, building permit and land registration) according to the World Bank’s Doing Business methodology. The relationship identified between the degree of decentralization and the speed of administrative service delivery at the local level was the basis for establishing that the time to register a company and obtain a building permit decreases as a function of the higher degree of decentralization. The time to register property increases as the degree of decentralization increases, which is partly explained by the complexity of the administrative procedure models and their duration. It is concluded that, a comparison of the speed of providing administrative services (business registration, construction permit, land registration) in Ukraine with the average indicator of a group of countries revealed significantly better results in Ukraine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yurіі Turovets , Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law Khmelnytskyi, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Doctor of Law Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Procedure Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, 29000, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Tetyana Kaganovska, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Law Sciences, Professor, Rector, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 61058, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Tatiana Filipenko, Educational and Scientific Institute of management Mariupol State University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor, Department of Public Management and Administration of educational and Scientific Institute of management Mariupol State University, 03037, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Anastasiia Filipenko , Mariupol State University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD of Law Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Economics, Mariupol State University, 03037, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Olha Kravchuk, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, Mykolayiv, Ukraine.

PhD in Political Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Social and Humanitarian Sciences, Educational and Scientific Humanitarian Institute, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding, 54007, Mykolayiv, Ukraine.

References

ARENDS, Helge. 2020. “The dangers of fiscal decentralization and public service delivery: A review of arguments” In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 599-622.

BIANCHI, Nicola; GIORCELLI, Michela; MARTINO, Enrica Maria. 2021. “The effects of fiscal decentralization on publicly provided services and labor markets” In: National Bureau of Economic Research. No. w29538. Available online. In: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29538. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

BORRETT, Camille; TUGRAN, Tugce; GANCHEVA, Mariya; ZAMPARUTTI, Tony. 2021. “Developing a decentralisation index for the committee of the regionsdivision ofpowersportal”In: EuropeanCommitteeoftheRegions. Available online. In: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2863/841455. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

BOSTANCI, Bülent; ERDEM, Nuri. 2020. “Investigating the satisfaction of citizens in municipality services using fuzzy modelling” In: Socio- Economic Planning Sciences. Vol. 69, No. 100754.

CAMÕES, Pedro J. 2022. “Types of decentralisation and governance: Evidence from across the world” In: Journal of Public Affairs. Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 112-129.

CANARE, Tristan. 2022. “Decentralization and welfare: Evidence from a panel of countries” In: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 767-796.

CHAUDHARY, Latika; IYER, Lakshmi. 2022. The importance of being local: Administrative decentralization and human development. Available online. In: http://sites.nd.edu/lakshmi-iyer/files/2022/10/Chaudhary_Iyer_AdministrativeDecentralization_2022Oct15.pdf. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS. 2022. Decentralization Index. Available online. In: https://portal.cor.europa.eu/divisionpowers/Pages/Decentralization-Index.aspx. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

GARDI, Bayar; SULAIMAN, Vian; SAEED, Hama; ALI, |Ranjdar; SULAIMAN, Ameena; MAHMOOD, Shelan Azeez; AL-KAKE, Farhad; HAMAWANDY, Nawzad Majeed. 2020. “The effect of capital competence on the profitability of development and investment banks in Turkey” In: Solid State Technology. Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 12571-12583.

HARGUINDÉGUY, Jean-Baptiste Paul; COLE, Alistair; PASQUIER, Romain. 2021. “The variety of decentralization indexes: A review of the literature” In: Regional and Federal Studies. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 185-208.

MARTINEZ-VASQUEZ, Jorge; LAGO-PEÑAS, Santiago; SACCHI, Agnese. 2017. “The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey” In: Journal of Economic Surveys. Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1095-1129.

MIHÁLIK, Jaroslav; HORVÁTH, Peter; ŠVIKRUHA, Martin. 2019. “Give me liberty or give me money: The fiscal decentralization and autonomy of regional governance in Slovakia” In: European Journal of Government and Economics. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 96-109.

NISHIMURA, Kenichi. 2022. “How does decentralization affect the performance of municipalities in urban environmental management in the Philippines?” In: Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 715-738.

OECD. 2019. Making decentralisation work. A Handbook for Policy-Makers, OECDMulti-levelGovernanceStudies,OECDPublishing,Paris.Available online. In: https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/g2g9faa7-en. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

PROSTO. 2022. Results of a survey of local governments on the provision of administrative services. Available online. In: https://prosto.in.ua/ ua/novyny/novyny/rezultati-opituvannya-oms-shchodo-nadannya- administrativnikh-poslug#_ftn1. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

SABIR, Bawan Yassin; OTHMAN, Baban Jabbar; GARDI, Bayar Ismael, NECHIRWAN, Burhan; HAMZA, Pshdar Abdalla; SORGULI, Sarhang; AZIZ, Hassan Mahmood; AHMED, Shahla Ali; ALI, Bayad Jamal; ANWAR, Govand. 2021. “Administrative decentralization: The transfer of competency from the ministry of education to general directorates” In: International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research. Vol. 5, No. 3.

SCHOUTE, Martijn; BUDDING, Tjerk; GRADUS, Raymond. 2018. “Municipalities’ choices of service delivery modes: The influence of service, political, governance, and financial characteristics” In: International Public Management Journal. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 502-532.

SIRYK, Zinoviy; POPADYNETS, Nazariy; PITYULYCH, Mykhaylo; CHAKII, Olha; IRTYSHCHEVA, Inna; PANUKHNYK, Olena; HYK, Vasyl; FEDOTOVA, Yana; ROHOZIAN, Yuliia; LYSYAK, Nataliia. 2021. “Decentralization of local self-government under the conditions of administrative-territorial reform in Ukraine” In: Accounting. Vol. 7, pp. 781-790.

SUJARWOTO, Sujarwoto. 2017. “Why decentralization works and does not works? A systematic literature review.” In: Journal of Public Administration Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 01-10.

TESTER, Aron. 2021. “Extending the State: Administrative Decentralization and Democratic Governance Around the World” In: PhD thesis. Available online. In: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hn8445z. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

WORLD BANK. 2020a. Doing Business 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available online. In: https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/ abs/10.1596/978-1-4648-1440-2. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

WORLD BANK. 2020b. Doing Business 2004-2020. Available online. In: https://archive.doingbusiness.org. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

WORLD BANK. 2020c. Ease of doing business in Ukraine. Available online. In: https://archive.doingbusiness.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/
ukraine#DB_dwcp. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

WORLD BANK. 2020d. Doing Business 2020. Economy Profile Czech Republic. Available online. In: https://archive.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/ doingBusiness/country/c/czech-republic/CZE.pdf. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

WORLD BANK. 2020e. Doing Business 2020. Economy Profile Latvia. Available online. In: https://archive.doingbusiness.org/content/ dam/doingBusiness/country/l/latvia/LVA.pdf. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

WORLD BANK. 2020f. Doing Business 2020. Economy Profile Germany. Available online. In: https://archive.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/ doingBusiness/country/g/germany/DEU.pdf. Consultation date: 27/10/2022.

ZIEGENHAIN, Patrick. 2015. Institutional engineering and political accountability in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Singapore.
Published
2023-02-15
How to Cite
Turovets , Y., Kaganovska, T., Filipenko, T., Filipenko , A., & Kravchuk, O. (2023). The impact of decentralization on the administrative service delivery speed in different fields: El impacto de la descentralización en la velocidad de prestación de servicios administrativos en diferentes campos. Political Questions, 41(76), 186-206. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.10

Most read articles by the same author(s)