Observance of individual rights in criminal proceedings during martial law

Observancia de los derechos individuales en los procesos penales durante la ley marcial

Keywords: criminal justice research, human rights protection, martial law, rights enforcement, justice and armed conflict

Abstract

The objective of the research was to identify threats to individual rights in criminal proceedings during martial law. The research involved system methods, descriptive analysis, systematic sampling, doctrinal approach and forecasting. Martial law introduced as a result of armed conflict carries important implications for criminal justice. Ensuring the observance of individual rights in criminal proceedings during this period applies to several crimes, the common feature of which is the time of their commission. The classification of subjects of prevention of infringement of such rights is presented. The prospects for improving the protection of individual rights in criminal proceedings require international assistance in the detection of crimes related to the armed conflict. It is concluded that ensuring the observance of individual rights in criminal proceedings during martial law requires combining the efforts of national and international specialists. Prospects for improving this process envisage international assistance with increased use of its results as evidence in national and international courts. It is appropriate to develop international recommendations for national law enforcement agencies and judicial bodies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nataliia Akhtyrska, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 01601, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Olena Kostiuchenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Process and Criminalistics, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 01601, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ivan Miroshnykov, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 01033, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Liudmyla Dunaievska, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 01601, Kyiv, Ukraine.

References

ARDEN, Mary. 2015. Human Rights and European Law: Building New Legal Orders. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

CARRERA, Sergio; MITSILEGAS, Valsamis; STEFAN, Marco. 2021. Criminal Justice, Fundamental Rights and the Rule of law in the Digital Age: Report of CEPS and QMUL Task Force / Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS). Brussels. Available online. In: https://www.ceps.eu/wp- content/uploads/2021/05/Criminal-Justice-Fundamental-Rights-and- the-Rule-of-law-in-the-Digital-Age.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

CENSS.2019.AGuidetoGatheringEvidencefortheInternationalCriminalCourt and Documenting International Crimes. Kyiv, Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Territories and Internally Displaced Persons of Ukraine. Available online. In: https://censs.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D 0%BA-%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%8F-%D0%9C%D0%9A%D0%A1.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

CHRISTAKIS, Theodore; BOUSLIMANI, Katia. 2021. “National Security, Surveillance, and Human Rights.” In: The Oxford Handbook of the International Law of Global Security. Robin Geiβ; Nils Melzer (eds.), pp. 699–C38.P84. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1093/ law/9780198827276.003.0039. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

COUNCIL OF BARS & LAW SOCIETIES OF EUROPE. 2019. CCBE Recommendations оn the Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Context of ‘National Security’. Available online. In: https:// www. ccbe. eu/ fileadmin / speciality_distr ibution / public/ documents/SURVEILLANCE/SVLGuidesrecommendations/ ENSVL20190329CCBE-Recommendations-on-the-protection- of-fundamental-rights-in-the-context-of-national-security.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

D’ALESSANDRA, Federica; SUTHERLAND, Kirsty. 2021. “The Promise and Challenges of New Actors and New Technologies in International Justice” In: Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 9-34.

DAVID, Eric. 2011. Principles of the law of armed conflicts. ICRC. Brussels, Belgium.

DUPONT,Benoît;STEVENS,Yuan;WESTERMANN,Hannes;JOYCE,Michael. 2018. Artificial Intelligence in the Context of Crime and Criminal Justice. A Report for the Korean Institute of Criminology. Korean Institute of Criminology, Canada Research Chair in Cybersecurity. Available online. In: https://www.cicc-iccc.org/public/media/files/prod/publication_ files/Artificial-Intelligence-in-the-Context-of-Crime-and-Criminal- Justice_KICICCC_2019.pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

ESKAURIATZA, Javier. 2021. “Complete Labelling” and Domestic Prosecutions for Crimes Against Humanity” In: Criminal Law Forum. Vol. 32, pp. 473- 509.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1978. Case оf Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978 / The European Court of Human Rights. Available online. In: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22item id%22:[%22001-57510%22]}. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 1987. Case оf Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987. Available online. In: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ eng?i=001-57519. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2010. Case оf Kennedy v. the United Kingdom, 18 August 2010. Available online. In: https://data. guardint.org/en/entity/ba35eci78cc. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

FREEMAN, Lindsay. 2018. “Digital Evidence and War Crimes Prosecutions: The Impact of Digital Technologies on International Criminal Investigations and Trials” In: Fordham International Law Journal. Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 283-335.

GVOZDIY, Valentyn. 2022. The rule of law in Ukraine during martial law: Review of changes to the criminal process. Available online. In: https:// www.kingsleynapley.co.uk/insights/blogs/criminal-law-blog/the- rule-of-law-in-ukraine-during-martial-law-review-of-changes-to-the- criminal-process. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

JEßBERGER, Florian; STEINL, Leonie. 2022. “Strategic Litigation in International Criminal Justice Facilitating a View from Within” In: Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 379-401.

LISITSYNA, Yuliya; GURTIEVA, Lyudmila; PAVLYSHYN, Andriy; LUKASHCHUK, Karina; NURIYEV, Elnur. 2022. “Corruption Crimes and Peculiarities of their Investigation Procedure under Martial Law” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 11, No. 54, pp. 41-49.

LOHNE, Kjersti. 2020. “Penal welfarism ‘gone global’? Comparing international criminal justice to the Culture of Control” In: Punishment and Society. Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 3-23.

MAYANS-HERMIDA, Beatriz; HOLA, Barbora. 2020. “Balancing ‘the International’ and ‘the Domestic’ Sanctions under the ICC Principle of Complementarity” In: Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 18, pp. 1103-1130.

McBRIDE, Jeremy. 2009. Human rights and criminal procedure: The case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Publishing. Available online. In: https://rm.coe.int/16806f0ef9. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

MYJER, Egbert; HANCOCK, Barry; COWDERY, Nicolas. 2009. Human Rights Manual for Prosecutors. International Association of Prosecutors. Available online. In: https://www.iap-association.org/getattachment/ Resources-Documentation/IAP-Human-Rights-Manual/Human_Rights_Manual_IAP.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

MYKHAILENKO, Vira. 2022. Judicial practice on preventive measures under martial law. LexInform. Available online. In: https://lexinform.com.ua/ yuridychna-praktyka/sudova-praktyka-z-pytan-zapobizhnyh-zahodiv- v-umovah-voyennogo-stanu/. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS. 2003. Human Rights in the Administration of Justice: A Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers. New York and Geneva.

P.H.P.H.M.C. VAN KEMPEN. 2014. Criminal Law and Human Rights. Radboud University Nifmegen. Nifmegen. Amsterdam, Netherlands.

SCHMITT, Stefan. 2022. “Proving war crimes isn’t simple – a forensics expert explains what’s involved with documenting human rights violations during conflicts, from Afghanistan to Ukraine” In: The Conversation, 5 August 2022. Available online. In: http://surl.li/djeia. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

SCHWARZ, Alexander. 2018. “War Crimes.” In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.

TEFERRA, Zelalem Mogessie. 2016. “National security and the right to liberty in armed conflict: The legality and limits of security detention in international humanitarian law” In: International Review of the Red Cross. Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 961-993.

UNITED NATIONS. 1966. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. General Assembly Resolution 2200A(XXI). Available online. In: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/ international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

UNITED NATIONS. 2011. International Legal Protection оf Human Rights іn Armed Conflict. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. New York and Geneva. Available online. In: https://www.ohchr.org/ sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/HR_in_armed_conflict. pdf. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.

UNITED NATIONS. 2022. The scale of extrajudicial killings in areas north of Kyiv is shocking. Available online. In: https://news.un.org/ru/ story/2022/05/1423702. Consultation date: 22/11/2022.
Published
2023-02-20
How to Cite
Akhtyrska, N., Kostiuchenko, O., Miroshnykov, I., & Dunaievska, L. (2023). Observance of individual rights in criminal proceedings during martial law: Observancia de los derechos individuales en los procesos penales durante la ley marcial. Political Questions, 41(76), 482-501. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4176.28

Most read articles by the same author(s)