Human rights during the mass introduction of artificial intelligence and robotic systems into public life

• Dmitry Kuteynikov Kutafin Moscow State Law University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-3085
• Osman Izhaev Kutafin Moscow State Law University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3777-8927
• Valerian Lebedev Kutafin Moscow State Law University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7642-1325
• Sergey Zenin Tyumen State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-757X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3971.36

Palabras clave: derechos humanos, robótica, calificación social, estado, sociedad civil

Resumen

El objetivo del artículo fue considerar enfoques legales para implementar los derechos humanos durante la explotación masiva de inteligencia artificial y los sistemas robóticos en la vida pública. Se trata de una investigación documental que hace énfasis en la regulación legal de los sistemas de inteligencia artificial y robótica utilizados para la identificación biométrica remota de una persona y la creación de sistemas de crédito social. Además, este estudio analiza diferentes modelos de regulación legal que son típicos de ciertos países y regiones, incluidos el Reino Unido, EE. UU., China y la UE. Resultados. Como conclusión se muestra que, en el Reino Unido, se permite el uso de sistemas de reconocimiento, pero el conjunto de escenarios y situaciones para su uso está significativamente limitado por la legislación y la aplicación de la ley. La regulación legal de estos sistemas en un estado determinado se basa en un diálogo constante entre el estado y la sociedad civil. El uso de inteligencia artificial y sistemas robóticos para crear sistemas de crédito social se prueba en algunos países. Los estados modernos han formado varios enfoques para la creación de tales sistemas: algunos de ellos prohíben completamente estos sistemas, mientras que otros no.

Citas

BIOMETRICS AND FORENSICS ETHICS GROUP. 2021. Briefing note on the ethical issues arising from public–private collaboration in the use of live facial recognition technology (accessible). GOV.UK. Available online. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-private-use- of-live-facial-recognition-technology-ethical-issues/briefing-note-on- the-ethical-issues-arising-from-public-private-collaboration-in-the- use-of-live-facial-recognition-technology-accessible. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

CENTRE FOR DATA ETHICS AND INNOVATION. 2020. Independent report Snapshot Paper – Facial Recognition Technology. GOV.UK. Available online. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cdei- publishes-briefing-paper-on-facial-recognition-technology/snapshot- paper-facial-recognition-technology. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION BOARD. 2021. EDPB & EDPS call for ban on use of AI for automated recognition of human features in publicly accessible spaces, and some other uses of AI that can lead to unfair discrimination. edpb.europa.eu. Available online. In: https://edpb. europa.eu/news/news/2021/edpb-edps-call-ban-use-ai-automated- recognition-human-features-publicly-accessible_en. Consultation date: 28/08/2021.

FEINER, Lauren; PALMER, Annie. 2021. Rules around facial recognition and policing remain blurry. CNBC. Available online. In: https://www. cnbc.com/2021/06/12/a-year-later-tech-companies-calls-to-regulate- facial-recognition-met-with-little-progress.html. Consultation date: 28/08/2021.

GORDON, Barrie. 2021. “Automated facial recognition in law enforcement: the Queen (on application of Edward Bridges) v the chief constable of South 619

Wales Police” In: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. Vol. 24, pp. 1-29.

GURINOVICH, Aleksander; LAPINA, M.A; IVANOV, A.E. 2020. “Ways of restricting the rights of taxpayers under agreements for the avoidance of double taxation in national legislation” In: SAGE Open. Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 1-8.

GURINOVICH, Aleksander; SMIRNIKOVA, J.L. 2021. “Debt policy of the Russian regions: economic and legal research” In: Indian Journal of Finance. Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 23-35.

HACIYAKUPOGLU, Gulizar. 2021. China’s social credit system: questions on the current status, role of data and surveillance, and influence outside of China. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Riga, Latvia. Available online. In: https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/ chinas-social-credit-system-current-status-role-of-data-and- surveillance-and-influence-outside-of-china/209. Consultation date: 28/08/2021.

KOSTKA, Genia; STEINACKER, Lea; MECKEL, Miriam. 2021. “Between security and convenience: facial recognition technology in the eyes of citizens in China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States” In: Public Understanding of Science. Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 671-690.

LIVINGSTON, Steven; RISSE, Mathias. 2019. “The future impact of artificial intelligence on humans and human rights” In: Ethics & International Affairs. Vol. 2, pp. 141-158.

PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL LAYING DOWN HARMONISED RULES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACT) AND AMENDING CERTAIN UNION LEGISLATIVE ACTS. 2016. EUR-Lex. Available online. In: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ ALL/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

ROBERTS, Huw; COWLS, Josh; MORLEY, Jessica; TADDEO, Mariarosaria; WANG, Vincent; FLORIDI, Luciano 2021. “The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation” In: AI & Society. Vol. 36, pp. 59-77.

SAKIN, Nicole. 2021. Will there be federal facial recognition regulation in the US? iapp.org. Available online. In: https://iapp.org/news/a/u-s-facial- recognition-roundup/. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

SURVEILLANCE CAMERA CODE OF PRACTICE. 2013. GOV.UK. Available online. In: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1010815/Surveillance_ Camera_Code_of_Practice update_.pdf. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ENGLAND AND WALES. 2020. The Queen (on the application of Edward Bridges) (Appellant) v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police (Respondent) & others [2020] EWCA Civ 1058. Available online. In: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2020/08/R-Bridges-v-CC-South-Wales-ors-Judgment.pdf. Consultation date: 05/05/2021.

WOOLLACOTT, Emma. 2021. UK Government accused of sneaking through new live facial recognition rules. Forbes.com. Available online. In: https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2021/08/23/uk- government-accused-of-sneaking-through-new-live-facial-recognition- rules/?sh=e47cf88706f3. Consultation date: 28/08/2021.

ZIYAN, Chen; SHIGUO, Liu. 2021. “China’s self-driving car legislation study” In: Computer Law and Security Review. Vol. 41, Article 105555.