The influence of information and communication technologies on the development of social and political structures of the network society

Keywords: social groups, network society, socio-political structures, information, communication, organization

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the transformation of the socio-political structures of the network society, taking into account the influence of globalization processes and the development of information and communication technologies. Since we live in a networked society where information and communication technologies play a key role, it is important to examine how these factors shape the socio-political landscape. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to study the relationship between social and political structures, globalization processes and the development of information and communication technologies. We used the following methods: abstraction, deduction, systematization and generalization. It has been determined that the emergence of a network society causes a restructuring of socio-political institutions, which leads to the emergence of new structures and determines the specifics of the functioning of socio-political networks in the context of globalization. The influence of social institutions on digitalization is analyzed. The study of the representation of social interests at the network level was conducted in Ukraine in 2022. The transformation of the influence of information and communication networks on the development of socio-political structures of the network society and the formation of approaches to the interaction of the political apparatus with citizens is investigated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Iryna Verkhovod, Ukraine Borys Grinchehko Kyiv Unversity, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine Borys Grinchehko Kyiv Unversity, Kyiv, Ukraine. Сandidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor.

Vira Haponenko, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine.

Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine. Doctor of Political Sciences,
Associate Professor.

Oleg Kravtsov, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine. PhD in Chemical Sciences, Аssociate Professor.

Тetiana Kravtsova, Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine. PhD in Technical Science, Аssociate Professor.

Svitlana Bulbeniuk, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine.

Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Ukraine. Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor.

References

AUGUST, Vincent. (2022). Political ideas of the network society: why digitalization research needs critical conceptual analysis. Z Politikwiss 32, 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-021-00305-z

BERG, Sebastian; RAKOWSKI, Niklas; THORSTEN, Thiel. (2020). The digital constellation. Berlin: Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society. - The German Internet Institute. https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.ws/14

CASTELLS, Manuel. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51 (1): 5–24.

CASTELLS, Manuel. (2006). The network society: From knowledge to policy. M. Castells & G. Cardoso (Eds.), Societies in transition to the network society (pp. 3–23). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

CASTELLS, Manuel. (2023). The Network Society Revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(7), 940–946.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221092803.

DEUTSCH, Karl. (1969). Politische Kybernetik: Modelle und Perspektiven. Freiburg.

DEUTSCH, Karl. (1963). The Nerves of Government Modesl of Political Communication and Control. New York.

FISCHER, Manuel. (2013). Policy network structures, institutional context, and policy change. Paper prepared for the 1st International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP), Grenoble, June 2013. Retrieved from www.icpublicpolicy.org/ IMG/pdf/panel07s02_ fi scher_icpp.pdf

FUCHS, Christian. (2009). A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Transnational Informational Capitalism. Rethinking Marxism, 21(3): 387- 402.

KAUFMANN, Mareile; JEANDESBOZ, Julien. (2017). Politics and ‘the digital’. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3):309–328.

KNOKE, David. (1994). Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Analytical report on the «opinions and views of the ukrainian population regarding state electronic services». (2022). Kyiv. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/ukraine/publications/analytical-report-opinions-and-views-ukrainian-population-regarding-state-electronic-services .

LAUMANN, Edward; KNOKE David. (1987). The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

MAGER, Astrid; KATZENBACH, Christian. (2021). Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: multiple, contested, commodified. New Media & Society, 23(2):223–236

MARSH, David; SMITH, Martin. (2000). Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies, 48 (4): 4-21.

McLUHAN, Marshall. (1967). The Timid Giant. In Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (pp. 329-343). Sphere Books Limited London, England.

MIZRUCHI, Mark. (1992). The Structure of Corporate Political Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

NIKITENKO, Vitalina; VORONKOVA, Valentyna; OLEKSENKO, Roman; ANDRIUKAITIENE, Regina; HOLOVII, Liudmyla. (2022). Education as a factor of cognitive society development in the conditions of digital transformation. Revista de la Universidad del Zulia, 13(38), 680-695.
https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.38.37

POHLE, Julia; THORSTEN, Thiel. (2019). Digitale Vernetzung und Souveränität: Genealogie eines Spannungsverhältnisses. In Internet und Staat. Perspektiven auf eine komplizierte Beziehung, ed. Isabelle Borucki, Wolf J. Schünemann: 57–80. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

SMART, Barry. (2000). A Political Economy of New Times? Critical Reflections on the Network Society and the Ethos of Informational Capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 3(1): 51-65.

THE UNITED NATIONS. (2022). The United Nations E-Government Knowledgebase. Retrieved from: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/180-Ukraine/dataYear/2022.

TOFFLER, Alvin. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: Morrow.

VOINOVA, Ellina. (2021). The network society concept as structural and functional basis of the e-democracy theory. Politikus, 1, 12–19.

VORONKOVA, Valentyna; NIKITENKO, Vitalina; BILOHUR, Vlada; OLEKSENKO, Roman; BUTCHENKO, Taras. (2022). Conceptualization of smart-philosophy as a post-modern project of non-linear pattern development of the XXI century. Cuestiones Políticas, 40(73). 527-538. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4073.29

VORONKOVA, Valentyna; NIKITENKO, Vitalina; OLEKSENKO, Roman; ANDRIUKAITIENE, Regina; KHARCHENKO, Julia; KLIUIENKO, Eduard. (2023). Digital Technology Evolution of the Industrial Revolution From 4G to 5G in the
Context of the Challenges of Digital Globalization. TEM Journal, 12(2). 732-742.
https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122-17

ZERNETSKA, Olga. (2019). Global communication and the evolution of values. Evolution of values in the era of globalization: a collection of scientific papers / edited by OV Zernetskaya, 5-12.

RATING OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS: 84% OF SMARTPHONE OWNERS IN UKRAINE USE THE "DIIA" APP. (2022) Retrieved from: https://bykvu.com/ua/bukvy/reitynh-mobilnykh-dodatkiv-84-vlasnykiv-smartfoniv-v-ukraini-korystuiutsia-zastosunkom-diia/
Published
2024-04-03
How to Cite
Verkhovod, I., Haponenko, V., Kravtsov, O., KravtsovaТ., & Bulbeniuk, S. (2024). The influence of information and communication technologies on the development of social and political structures of the network society. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 14(2), 386-398. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10909782