Garantizar la justicia social en la aplicación de la ley y las actividades judiciales: análisis de las normas internacionales y la práctica nacional
Palabras clave:
justicia social, actividad judicial, normas jurídicas, estándares internacionales, análisis comparativo
Resumen
El artículo examina los aspectos teóricos y prácticos de garantizar la justicia social en las actividades judiciales y policiales y destaca cómo el Estado apoya la justicia social. El principal método de investigación es el análisis comparativo, que implica una revisión sistemática de las normas internacionales y nacionales que ayudan a equilibrar la justicia social, en particular en el contexto de los órganos judiciales y policiales (en el ejemplo de Ucrania). Se estableció que el estudio de los mecanismos para garantizar la justicia social, el desarrollo de nuevos enfoques para la implementación y mejora de las normas jurídicas existentes son las tareas más importantes para lograr altos estándares de orden público y garantizar una justicia justa. Como principio rector de la actividad de los órganos policiales y judiciales, la justicia social aparece, por un lado, como un concepto inconmensurable sin indicadores cuantitativos claros, lo que dificulta la evaluación en el contexto social y se basa en la percepción subjetiva de los individuos y sociedad. Por el contrario, la justicia social es un valor fundamental definido que está respaldado, garantizado y protegido tanto por estándares internacionales como por normas jurídicas nacionales.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
About the National Police. (2015). Law of Ukraine dated July 2, 2015 No. 580-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/580-19#Text.
Aristotle. (2000). Policy. Kyiv: 239 p. Britannica. (2024). The Republic dialogue by Plato. https://www.britannica.com/topic/The- Republic.
Chorna, S. Z. (2021). The human rights function of the judiciary under the conditions of constitutional reform in modern Ukraine (Candidate’s dissertation in legal sciences, Kyiv): 245 p.
Davies, B. (2018). John Rawls ‘A Theory of Justice’. 1000-Word Philosophy. https://philar-zhive.org/archive/DAVJRA#:~:text=Rawls%20suggests%20that%20justice%20at,basic% 20structure’%20of%20a%20society
Fedina, N. V. (2014). Modern understanding of justice in the activities of internal affairs bo- dies: theoretical and legal research: monograph. Lviv: LvDUVS: 196 p.
Fedina, N. V. (2020). Social justice and its normative consolidation in the activities of law enforcement bodies of the state. South Ukrainian legal journal, 4, 165–170.
Hrynenko, A. M. (2009). Social policy: education. manual Kyiv: KNEU Publishing House: 540 p.
Komarova, O. O. (2008). Social justice as the main principle of the process of distribution of social transfers. Ukr. socìum, 2(25), 106–112.
Korniienko, P. S. (2014). Correlation of concepts and practice of law enforcement and human rights protection activities in Ukraine. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 3, 60–63.
Lehkykh, K. V. (2020). Justice as the principle of activity of national courts. State and regions, 3(69), 2. https://doi.org/10.32840/1813-338X-2020.3.2.25.
Maliarenko, V. (2004). Court, law enforcement and human rights bodies of Ukraine. Kyiv: 200 p.
Marysyuk, K., & Slotvinska, N. (2021). The principle of justice and its place in the system of principles of punishment. Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: “Le- gal Sciences”, 1 (29), 133-137.https://science.lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/journal-paper/2021/ may/23541/20.pdf
National Academy of Internal Affairs. (2024). Judicial and law enforcement bodies of Ukraine: training. manual. https://arm.naiau.kiev.ua/books/spou_2019/info/lec1.html#:~:text=%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BC%20%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B0%20%D1%82%D0%B0%D 0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B6%20%D1%83.
On the judiciary and the status of judges. (2016). Law of Ukraine dated June 2, 2016 No.1402-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text.
Political science encyclopedic dictionary. (1997). Education manual for students of higher education institutions. Kyiv: Genesis: 400 p.
Rawls, J. (2024). A Theory of Justice. ECON. https://www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/econ362/hallam/readings/rawl_justice.pdf.
Samokhvalov, V. V. (2006). Legality and justice: theoretical and legal problems of relationship and interaction (Abstract of the candidate’s dissertation in legal sciences, Kyiv). 18 p.
Shelever, N. V. (2020). The principle of justice and its implementation by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine during the administration of justice. Actual problems of the state and law, 86, 259–263.
Shemshuchenko Yu.S. (2004). Legal encyclopedia, 6. Kyiv: 768 p. Shumna, L. P. (2012). Social justice as one of the main principles of providing social services. Actual problems of politics, 45, 37–42.
Sokurenko, V. V. (2002). The role of social justice in the development of a legal welfare state (Abstract of the candidate’s dissertation in legal sciences, Kyiv). 19 p.
Suveilan H. Al. (2001). General characteristics of the concepts of justice in ancient and medieval philosophy (review of definitions). Philos. opinion, 3, 60–70.
Tsvyrkun, Yu. (2023). European standards of a fair trial and their application during the resolution of public legal disputes. Actual problems of jurisprudence, 3, 76–83.
United Nations General Assembly. (1948). International Bill of Human Rights. https://documents.un.org/doc/resolution/gen/nr0/043/88/pdf/nr004388.pdf
United Nations. (2024). Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/human-rights#:~:text=Human%20rights%20are%20rights%20inherent,and%20education%2C%20 and%20many%20more
Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T. S. J., & Meyer, M. J. (2014). Justice and Fairness. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/justice-and-fairness/#:~:text=The%20most%20fundamental%20principle%20ofsometimes%20expressed%20as%20follows% 3A%20%22Individuals
Aristotle. (2000). Policy. Kyiv: 239 p. Britannica. (2024). The Republic dialogue by Plato. https://www.britannica.com/topic/The- Republic.
Chorna, S. Z. (2021). The human rights function of the judiciary under the conditions of constitutional reform in modern Ukraine (Candidate’s dissertation in legal sciences, Kyiv): 245 p.
Davies, B. (2018). John Rawls ‘A Theory of Justice’. 1000-Word Philosophy. https://philar-zhive.org/archive/DAVJRA#:~:text=Rawls%20suggests%20that%20justice%20at,basic% 20structure’%20of%20a%20society
Fedina, N. V. (2014). Modern understanding of justice in the activities of internal affairs bo- dies: theoretical and legal research: monograph. Lviv: LvDUVS: 196 p.
Fedina, N. V. (2020). Social justice and its normative consolidation in the activities of law enforcement bodies of the state. South Ukrainian legal journal, 4, 165–170.
Hrynenko, A. M. (2009). Social policy: education. manual Kyiv: KNEU Publishing House: 540 p.
Komarova, O. O. (2008). Social justice as the main principle of the process of distribution of social transfers. Ukr. socìum, 2(25), 106–112.
Korniienko, P. S. (2014). Correlation of concepts and practice of law enforcement and human rights protection activities in Ukraine. Journal of the Kyiv University of Law, 3, 60–63.
Lehkykh, K. V. (2020). Justice as the principle of activity of national courts. State and regions, 3(69), 2. https://doi.org/10.32840/1813-338X-2020.3.2.25.
Maliarenko, V. (2004). Court, law enforcement and human rights bodies of Ukraine. Kyiv: 200 p.
Marysyuk, K., & Slotvinska, N. (2021). The principle of justice and its place in the system of principles of punishment. Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. Series: “Le- gal Sciences”, 1 (29), 133-137.https://science.lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/journal-paper/2021/ may/23541/20.pdf
National Academy of Internal Affairs. (2024). Judicial and law enforcement bodies of Ukraine: training. manual. https://arm.naiau.kiev.ua/books/spou_2019/info/lec1.html#:~:text=%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BC%20%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B0%20%D1%82%D0%B0%D 0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B6%20%D1%83.
On the judiciary and the status of judges. (2016). Law of Ukraine dated June 2, 2016 No.1402-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text.
Political science encyclopedic dictionary. (1997). Education manual for students of higher education institutions. Kyiv: Genesis: 400 p.
Rawls, J. (2024). A Theory of Justice. ECON. https://www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/econ362/hallam/readings/rawl_justice.pdf.
Samokhvalov, V. V. (2006). Legality and justice: theoretical and legal problems of relationship and interaction (Abstract of the candidate’s dissertation in legal sciences, Kyiv). 18 p.
Shelever, N. V. (2020). The principle of justice and its implementation by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine during the administration of justice. Actual problems of the state and law, 86, 259–263.
Shemshuchenko Yu.S. (2004). Legal encyclopedia, 6. Kyiv: 768 p. Shumna, L. P. (2012). Social justice as one of the main principles of providing social services. Actual problems of politics, 45, 37–42.
Sokurenko, V. V. (2002). The role of social justice in the development of a legal welfare state (Abstract of the candidate’s dissertation in legal sciences, Kyiv). 19 p.
Suveilan H. Al. (2001). General characteristics of the concepts of justice in ancient and medieval philosophy (review of definitions). Philos. opinion, 3, 60–70.
Tsvyrkun, Yu. (2023). European standards of a fair trial and their application during the resolution of public legal disputes. Actual problems of jurisprudence, 3, 76–83.
United Nations General Assembly. (1948). International Bill of Human Rights. https://documents.un.org/doc/resolution/gen/nr0/043/88/pdf/nr004388.pdf
United Nations. (2024). Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/human-rights#:~:text=Human%20rights%20are%20rights%20inherent,and%20education%2C%20 and%20many%20more
Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T. S. J., & Meyer, M. J. (2014). Justice and Fairness. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/justice-and-fairness/#:~:text=The%20most%20fundamental%20principle%20ofsometimes%20expressed%20as%20follows% 3A%20%22Individuals
Publicado
2025-03-26
Cómo citar
Tomchuk, A., Koshova, O., Kharchenko, V., Dmytriiev, S., & Kaluhin, Y. (2025). Garantizar la justicia social en la aplicación de la ley y las actividades judiciales: análisis de las normas internacionales y la práctica nacional. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 15(2), 561-569. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15080553
Sección
Artículos de Investigación
