Descartes' influence on Chomsky's theory and his analysis of language
Abstract
The world thinker, Noam Chomsky, is one of the most prominent thinkers in the field of language, politics and culture in general, for his knowledge of these fields. His ideas have revolutionized, especially in the field of langua- ge and the modern outlook on linguistic sciences. These ideas formed an important turning point in this cognitive field which has been demonstrated by the inability of the experimental behavioral model to explain the language. Chomsky's revolution on behaviorists is an independent stage in the history of linguistics. It is a critical view that can only be understood if we address the rational origins from which Chomsky drew his ideas and draw the limits of his theory. Chomsky's innovation was an extension of the Cartesian rational heritage, which was the most important pillar of his theory of obstetrics. Descartes' philosophy was therefore clearly influenced by Chomsky's thought. To this end, our research dealt with the study of the influence of Descartes on Chomsky's theory and its analysis of language, according to an epistemo- logy in which the mind is fully present in which we tried to answer the following question: How did Descartes put forward Chomsky's analysis and analysis of the work of language and reason? As well as the analysis of language instinct under that comprehensive view.References
• Chomsky. N (1987) Grammar structures, I, Baghdad: House of Cultural Affairs: 6,75
• Chomsky. N (1985) aspects of grammar theory:, University of Basra: 67 •War. P (2001) Theories of Theory, I 1, Morocco: 73.
• Kharma. (1990) Spotlight on Contemporary Language Studies, I 1 Kuwait: The World of Knowledge: 134.
• Kharma N. (1990) Foreign Languages Teaching and Learning Kuwait, World Knowledge Series: 69
• Robbins. (1990) Summary of the history of linguistics in the West, Kuwait, the world of knowledge: 312
• Al-Rajhi. (1979) Arabic grammar and modern lesson. Research in the curri- culum. Author, Beirut, Arabic Renaissance House: 118.
• Descartes. P.T. Metaphysical Reflections in the First Philosophy, Beirut, Lebanon: 24,25
• Descartes. R. (1968), Essay on Method I 2: 186, 261.
• Zakaria. (1983) Arabic (Modern Linguistics) Principles and Information, II, Beirut: University Foundation for Publication: 262,266.
•The master . (1989) Chomsky's linguistic thought and critics' views, Alexan- dria: Dar al-Maarifah: 24
• Shayeb. (1999) Lectures in Linguistics, I 1 Amman Jordan, Ministry of Culture: 307, 379, 380.
• Galvan. M. et al (2010) Linguistic Linguistics I 1, Jordan, The World of Modern Writers: 6,7
• Galvan. M (2010) in General Linguistics, I 1, Libya, New United Book House: 127.
•Fayza. Kh. (1984) Towards the Language and Its Structures Approach and Application. Studies and Views in Light of Modern Linguistics, Saudi Arabia Knowledge World:
• Fadlallah. M. (1996) Descartes' Philosophy and Methodology (Critical Analytical Study), Beirut, Dar Al-Tali'ah: 155
• Lewins. C (2009) Language and Linguistics I 1, Jordan, Dar Jarir for publica- tion and distribution: 205 206.
• Matthews. (B) Language is a mental ability provided by Chomsky (within the linguistic encyclopedia), Saudi Arabia - Riyadh. Scientific Publishing and Printing - King Saud University: 1/187.
• Moore (1998) Understanding Language: Towards Post-Chomsky Language Science: I 1, Baghdad House of Cultural Affairs: 35,134,137.
•Bee. M (2002) New Horizons in Contemporary Language Research, I 1, Egypt: Dar Al Maarefah University: 175.
