Uso de métodos interactivos de colaboración entre los participantes del proceso educativo en las condiciones del aprendizaje a distancia

• Larysa V. Zdanevych Khmelnytskyi Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8387-2143
• Alla I. Chagovets Municipal Establishment «Kharkiv Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy» of Kharkiv Regional Council https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-3165
• Ivan O. Stepanets Municipal Establishment «Kharkiv Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy» of Kharkiv Regional Council https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0600-4398
• Milena I. Yaroslavtseva Municipal Establishment «Kharkiv Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy» of Kharkiv Regional Council https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0600-4398
• Svitlana V. Pyekharyeva Municipal Establishment «Kharkiv Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy» оf Kharkiv Regional Council https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7465-0653

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.35.16

Palabras clave: métodos, educación a distancia, tecnologías, educación, efectividad

Resumen

El propósito del artículo consistió en estudiar tres grupos de factores de percepción de la introducción de métodos interactivos de educación a distancia en el entorno educativo de las Instituciones de Educación Superior. La investigación utilizó métodos de investigación científica general, métodos de cuestionario, métodos para la evaluación integrada, métodos
matemáticos de procesamiento de datos: cálculo de las características consolidadas de la motivación, prueba de signos. El estudio reveló un bajo nivel de conocimiento de los estudiantes sobre las tecnologías de educación a distancia y, por el contrario, un alto nivel de interés de los estudiantes en dominar los métodos interactivos de educación a distancia. El artículo detecta la influencia del entorno educativo de las IES en la formación de la disposición de los estudiantes para utilizar tecnologías interactivas de educación a distancia. El artículo considera propiedades de los métodos interactivos como la movilidad, la apertura, la accesibilidad y el uso de tecnologías interactivas de aprendizaje a distancia. El artículo tiene como objetivo estudiar las peculiaridades de la actitud de los estudiantes ante la introducción de tecnologías interactivas de aprendizaje a distancia en el proceso educativo. Otras perspectivas de investigación están en la creación de un sistema de seguimiento de la preparación de los estudiantes para la implementación de tecnologías in novadoras en relación con el desarrollo constante del progreso científico y tecnológico.

Citas

Altinay, F., Altinay, Z., Aydin, C., & Dagli, G. (2021). Widening international perspectives and practices through online learning for developing critical friendship and skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 231-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09869-z

Arthur-Nyarko, E., Agyei, D.D. & Armah, J.K. (2020). Digitizing distance learning materials: Measuring students’ readiness and intended challenges. Educational Informational Technology, 25, 2987–3002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10060-y.

Awadhiya, A. K., Miglani, A., & Gowthaman, K. (2014). ICT usage by distance learners in India. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.52135

Chen, L., Xin, B., & Chen, J. (2017). A tradeoff-based interactive multi-objective optimization method driven by evolutionary algorithms. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 21(2), 284-292. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jaciii/21/2/21_284/_pdf/-char/en

Cook, D. A. & Dupras, D. M. (2004). A practical guide to developing effective web -based learning. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(6), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525- 1497.2004.30029.x.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40

Dawn, L. (2017). Online, blended and technology-enhanced learning: Tools to facilitate community college student success in the digitally-driven workplace. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 10(4), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v10i4.10039

Esterhuyse, M., & Scholtz, B. (2015). Barriers to e - Learning in a Developing Country: An Explorative Study. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Barriers-to-e- Learning-in-a-Developing-Country%3A-An- Esterhuyse/b919bfc4cf5e784ed9f797d0156c13358a109f3c

Fowler, R. C. (2019). The effects of synchronous online course orientation on student attrition, [Ph.D thesis]. Columbia: University of South Carolina. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5346

Francescucci, A., & Rohani, L. (2019). Exclusively synchronous online (VIRI) learning: The impact on student performance and engagement outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318818864

Gewin, V. (2020). Five tips for moving teaching online as COVID19 takes hold. Nature, 580, 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00896-7

Hamdan, K.M., Al-Bashaireh, A.M., Zahran, Z., Al-Daghestani, A., AL-Habashneh, S., & Shaheen, A.M. (2021). University students' interaction, Internet self-efficacy, self-regulation and satisfaction with online education during pandemic crises of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2). International Journal of Educational Management, 35 (3), 713-725. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2020-0513

Heitin, L. (2017). What is digital literacy? Education Week, 36(12), 5–6. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/11/09/what-is-digital-literacy.html.

International Telecommunications Union. (2017). Measuring the information society report 2017 volume 2. Geneva: ICT country profiles. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/world/measuring-information-society-report-2017

Irvine, V., Code, J., & Richards, L. (2013). Realigning higher education for the 21st century learner through multi-access learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 172–186. Retrieved from https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/irvine_0613.pdf

Kilpatrick, C. D. (2019). Faces or fingers: Building community with synchronous chat. In Yoon J. & Semingson P. (Eds.), Educational technology and resources for synchronous learning in higher education (pp. 1–22). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7567- 2.ch001

Liu, Q., Chen, H. & Crabbe, M. (2021). Interactive Study of Multimedia and Virtual Technology in Art Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(1), 80-93. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10547/624755

Miglani, A., & Awadhiya, A. K. (2017). Mobile learning: Readiness and perceptions of teachers of open universities of commonwealth Asia. Journal of Learning and Development – JL4D, 4(1), 58–71. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1141535.pdf

Nelson, L. (2017). Harnessing the power of the synchronous classroom in staff development. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 48(2), 62–64. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124- 20170119-05.

Onofrei, G., & Ferry, P. (2020) Reusable learning objects: a blended learning tool in teaching computer-aided design to engineering undergraduates. International Journal of Educational Management, 34, 1559-1575. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2019-0418

Patel, D. & Patel, H. (2017). Blended learning in higher education using moodle open source learning management tool. International journal of advance research in computer science, 8, 439-442. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v8i5.3327

Ribble, M. (2017). Digital Citizenship: Using Technology Appropriately. Digital Citizenship Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/nine-elements.html.

Rodríguez-Rodríguez, E., Sánchez-Paniagua, M., Sanz-Landaluze, J., & Moreno-Guzmán, M. (2020). Analytical Chemistry Teaching Adaptation in the COVID-19 Period: Experiences and Students’ Opinion. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2556-2564. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00923

Seredenko, P. V. (2010). Psychological and pedagogical research: methodology and methods. Retrieved from http://sakhgu.ru/wp- content/uploads/page/record_85102/2019_04/Середенко-П.-В.-Психолого- педагогическое-исследование-методология-и-методы.pdf

Setiawan, A. R. (2020). Pembelajaran Tematik Berorientasi Literasi Saintifik. Jurnal Basicedu: Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i1.298

Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M., & Bernstein, M. (2018). Development of an instrument to measure Faculty’s information and communication technology access (FICTA). Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639- 017-9599-9.

Sugiyono, D. (2018). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi. Retrieved from: http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/6233/1/Buku%20Metpen%20Sigit%20dan%20Amirullah.pdf

Sushchenko, O., Trunina, I., Basyuk, D., & Pokolodna, M. (2019) Coaching as Education Technology on Electrical Engineering Education. IEEE International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy Systems, 1,426-429. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEES.2019.8896507.

Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Anastasios, A. (2021) Development and validation of a students’ remote learning attitude scale (RLAS) in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 41, 152-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10586-0.