La jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos sobre la protección de los Derechos Humanos y las libertades en términos de protección de la seguridad nacional

• Yevhen Bilousov Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-2208
• Yevdokiia Streltsova Odesa I.I. Mechnikov National University, Odesa, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-1105
• Denys Chyzhov National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4843-0670
• Nail Ibad Abbasov Ministry of Justice of Azerbaijan Republic, Baku, Azerbaijan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-8697
• Svitlana Poliarush-Safronenko Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4007-8844

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.38.05

Palabras clave: Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, derechos y libertades, seguridad nacional, protección, justicia

Resumen

El objetivo del estudio fue analizar las prácticas del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos para resolver disputas relacionadas con violaciones de los Derechos Humanos y las libertades y la protección de la seguridad nacional. El tema elegido fue estudiado exhaustivamente a través de los métodos de investigación empíricos y teóricos, así como del análisis comparativo. El trabajo del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en el campo de la protección de los Derechos Humanos y las libertades en términos de seguridad nacional está relacionado con la resolución de disputas con respecto a: las restricciones a la privacidad, el acceso a la justicia, la libertad de expresión y la libertad de reunión pacífica para proteger los propios intereses. Las disposiciones relativas del marco jurídico nacional y el Convenio para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y las Libertades Fundamentales determinan en gran medida el papel del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en la resolución de litigios relacionados con el respeto de los Derechos Humanos y las libertades, así como la protección de los derechos a la seguridad nacional. La jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos indica el estado actual de la aplicación de recursos legales a nivel internacional y nacional para garantizar la seguridad nacional, mediante la aplicación de sanciones y la imposición de restricciones a los Derechos Humanos y las libertades.

Citas

Bachmann, S.D., & Sanden, J. (2017). The right to liberty and security according to article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights and facing threats to public safety and national security. Journal of South African Law, 2017(2). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-65dc5dd94

Bignami, F., & Resta, G. (2018). Human Rights Extraterritoriality: The Right to Privacy and National Security Surveillance. GWU Legal Studies Research Paper, 67, 2017.

Chamberlain, M. (2018). Special advocates and amici curiae in national security proceedings in the United Kingdom. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(3), 496-510. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2018-0002

Chlebny, J. (2018). Public Order, National Security and the Rights of Third-Country Nationals in Immigration Cases. European Journal of Migration and Law, 20(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340023

Christakis, T., & Bouslimani, K. (2019). National Security, Surveillance and Human Rights. R. Geiss, N. Melzer (Eds), Oxford Handbook on the International Law of Global Security. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3599994

Council of Europe. (n. d.). European Convention on Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf

Curtin, D. (2018). Second order secrecy and Europe’s legality mosaics. West European Politics, 41(4), 846-868. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1431427

Dickinson, L. (2021). National Security Policymaking in the Shadow of International Law. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper, 24, 2021-24. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3872681

European Court of Human Rights. (1978). Case of Klass and others v. Germany. Request no 5029/71 [in French]. September 6, 1978. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001- 62068

European Court of Human Rights. (1992). Case of Castells v. Spain. April 23, 1992. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-62328

European Court of Human Rights. (1998). Case of Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and others and McElduff and others v. UK [in French], July 10, 1998. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-62754

European Court of Human Rights. (2006). Weber and Saravia v. Germany [in French]. June 29, 2006. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-91699

European Court of Human Rights. (2010). Case Kennedy v. UK. Request no 26839/05 [in French]. May 18, 2010. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-98672

European Court of Human Rights. (2013). National Security and European Case-Law. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Research_report_national_security_ENG.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (2020). Case of Buturugă v. Romania. Request no 56867/15. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001 - 200842%22]}

European Court of Human Rights. (2022). The ECHR in facts & figures 2021. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Facts_Figures_2021_ENG.pdf

European Court of Human Rights. (2022a). Overview 1959-2021 ECHR. February 2022. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Overview_19592021_ENG.pdf

Fabbrini, F. (2018). Courts and the politics of secrecy: national security, human rights and the importance of supranational oversight. West European Politics, 41(4), 869-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1388691

Galani, S. (2020) Human Security Versus National Security in Anti-Terrorist Operations: Whose Security Does the Margin of Appreciation Serve? Human Dignity and Human Security in Times of Terrorism, 2020, 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-355-9_6

Grădinaru, S. (2018). Conditions Derived from the ECHR Jurisprudence for the Effectuation of Interceptions in European Union Member States. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 14(3), 5-22.

Hajipour, Z. (2020). The Right to a Fair Trial in the Mirror of the European Court of Human Rights, Relying on Abdullah Ocalan’s Case. Journal of Legal Research, 18(40), 89-116. Retrieved from https://jlr.sdil.ac.ir/article_104227.html?lang=en

Karvatska, S., & Zamorska, L. (2018). Human Rights Principles Interpretation in the Context of the ECHR. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 5(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/37

Kudriashova, О. (2017). Religious Associations as a National Security Threat: The Russian View in Light of European Standards. Review of Central and East European Law, 15 Oct 2017. Retrieved from https://brill.com/view/journals/rela/42/2-3/article-p101_101.xml

Magnus, J.P.D. (2020). Striking a Balance Between National Security & the Civil Right to Privacy: Improving National Security Intelligence Oversight in the US. POLI 464E: Intelligence and Politics, November 29, 2020.

Majić, H. (2021). The Croatian Constitutional Court and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: a Limbo Betwen the Charter, the ECHR and National Constitution. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series, 5, 198-219. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18304

Natoli, T. (2019). Testing the Analogy: The CoE–ECHR System Pioneering Human Rights Protection in the Cyberspace. Borders, Legal Spaces and Territories in Contemporary International Law, 2019, 145-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20929-2_6

Pădurariu, D.A. (2020). From Liberty to Encroachment via National Security. Conferința Internațională de Drept, Studii Europene și Relații Internaționale, 8, 274-283.

Prabhat, D. (2020). Political Context and Meaning of British Citizenship: Cancellation as a National Security Measure. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 16(2), 294-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872116655305

Radu, R.H. (2018). New Developments in the ECHR Case Law regarding the Collaboration with the Former Security Services: The Catalan v. Romania Decision. Revista Universul Juridic, 4, 69-77.

Simen, S. (2020). How National Security has led The European Court of Human Rights into a Growing Acceptance for Secret Surveillance. University of Oslo: Faculty of Law, 2020, 1-85.

Sychenko, E., & Chernyaeva, D. (2019). The Impact of the ECHR on Employee’s Privacy Protection. Italian Labour Law E-Journal, 12(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561- 8048/10015

Szabó, А.І., & Năvodariu, E.T. (2019). Asylum and Refugee Protection versus National Security ECHR jurisprudence concerning Romanian cases. Acta Universitatis George Bacovia. Juridica, 8(2), 375-414. Retrieved from https://www.ugb.ro/Juridica/Issue16ROEN/3._Dreptul_la_azil_si_protectia_refugiatilor.Sza bo.Navodariu.EN.pdf

Turner, I. (2020). Limits to Terror Speech in the UK and USA: Balancing Freedom of Expression with National Security. Amicus Curiae, 2(1) 201-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3517389

Ulfstein, G. (2020). Interpretation of the ECHR in light of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(7), 917-934. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1598055

United Nations (2021). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

Vasile, S.A., & Timiş, I. (2010). National Security and the Physical Surveillance of Private Life in Romania. Revista Pro Patria Lex, 8(2), 224-232.