Virtuality as the Ideality of the Information Society. / La virtualidad como idealidad en la sociedad de la información

• Oksana B. Krut Tyumen Industrial University
• Ludmila N. Koshetarova Tyumen State Institute of Culture
• Anna Yu. Losinskaya Tyumen State Institute of Culture
• Marina V. Korablina Tyumen Industrial University
• Marina V. Borovkova Ural State Law University

Palabras clave: Collective unconscious, ideationality, virtual environment models, virtuality, Inconsciente colectivo, ideacionalidad, modelos de entorno virtual, virtualidad.

Resumen

ABSTRACT

 From the philosophical and cultural point of view, the dynamically changing environment of the information society is considered, in which the tendencies of the emerging ideational culture system of the 21st century are revealed. The concepts of "virtual environment" and "virtuality" are divided. The virtual environment is represented as a technogenic information environment, the virtuality – as an idea abstracted from its technical embodiment and as a space of collective meanings. The ideality of modern society is revealed through three possible models of virtuality, described in the artistic and esoteric literature, as well as presented in feature films.

RESUMEN

 Desde el punto de vista filosófico y cultural, se considera el entorno dinámicamente cambiante de la sociedad de la información, en el que se revelan las tendencias del sistema de cultura ideacional emergente del siglo XXI. Los conceptos de "entorno virtual" y "virtualidad" se dividen. El entorno virtual se representa como un entorno de información tecnogénica, la virtualidad-como una idea abstraída de su personificación técnica y como un espacio de significados colectivos. La idealidad de la sociedad moderna se revela a través de tres posibles modelos de virtualidad, descritos en la literatura artística y esotérica, así como presentados en largometrajes. 

Citas

Akhmedova, M.A. (2004). Philosophy of West. Sharq, Тashkent.

Belief, F.D. (2017). Correctness and Constitutivity, European Journal of Philosophy. 25(4): pp.1084-1106.

Chaloyan, V. (1979). West-East: succession in philosophy of Antiquity and Middle Ages. Nauka, Мoscow.

Chikolini, L.S. (1989). Erasmus and his time. Nauka, Moscow.

Coseru, C. (2017). Personal identity and cosmopolitan philosophy, Philosophical Studies. 174(7): pp. 1749–1760.

Gow, L. (2016). The Limitations of Perceptual Transparency, Philosophical Quarterly. 66(265): pp. 723–744.

Hoerz, H. (1986). Der dialektische Determinismus in Natur und Gesellschaft. DVW, Berlin.

Kondorse, J. (1936). Sketch of historical progress picture of human ratio. Sotsekgiz, Мoscow.

Laasik, K. (2017). Action and Variation in Perception, European Journal of Philosophy. 25(4): pp. 1364-1375.

Nazarov, K. (2004). Garb falsafasi. Shark, Tashkent.

O'Shea, M.V. (1996). The World Book Encyclopedia. World Book, Chicago.

Shadmanov, K. (2003). Sovereign Uzbekistan and Issues of Philosophical Terminology. XXI World Congress of Philosophy. Abstracts. Istanbul, Turkey.

Shadmanov, K. (2010). English spirituality and language. Bukhoro, Bukhara.

Shadmanov, K. (2015). English spirituality and language: interdependence of linguo-philosophic dialogue of West-East. Lambert, Dusseldorf, Germany.

Skirbekk, G.N. (1996). The History of Philosophy. Izdatel'stvo, Oslo.

Ströing, P. (2018). Data, Evidence, and Explanatory Power, Philosophy of Science. 85(3): pp.422-441.