Legal Regulation of Socially-Oriented Legal Eechnique Reglamentación jurídica de la técnica jurídica de orientación social

• Alexander N. Khorin Lomonosov Moscow State University http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7618-0026
• Yulia M. Potanina Moscow State Institute of International Relations
• Alexander V. Brovkin Moscow State Institute of International Relations

Palabras clave: Legislation, modernization, regulation, technology, Legislación, modernización, regulación, tecnología.

Resumen

ABSTRACT

 The authors defined conceptual provisions of the modern classification and specification of legal technologies. The legal tools of law enforcement technology are investigated, its concept and structure are revealed, typologies of law enforcement and law enforcement technology are defined; the forms of expression of law enforcement technology are investigated; the features of the use of law enforcement technology in various types of legal activity are revealed; the author's model of law enforcement technology of arbitration proceedings is developed; the problems of law enforcement monitoring are analyzed. The authors have proposed the ways of using judicial practice in law enforcement monitoring.

 RESUMEN

 Los autores definieron las disposiciones conceptuales de la moderna clasificación y especificación de las tecnologías jurídicas. Se investigan los instrumentos jurídicos de la tecnología de aplicación de la ley, se revelan su concepto y estructura, se definen las tipologías de la aplicación de la ley y la tecnología de aplicación de la ley; se investigan las formas de expresión de la tecnología de aplicación de la ley; se revelan las características del uso de la tecnología de aplicación de la ley en diversos tipos de actividad jurídica; se desarrolla el modelo de autor de tecnología de aplicación de la ley en los procedimientos de la cotidianidad; se analizan los problemas de la vigilancia de la aplicación de la ley. Los autores han propuesto las formas de utilizar la práctica judicial en la vigilancia de la aplicación de la ley.

 

Citas

Alder, J., Wilkinson, D. (1999). The range of legal techniques, in: Environmental Law and Ethics, pp. 188- 219, Macmillan Education UK, London.

Binder, Ch., Hofbauer, J.A. (2017). The perception of the EU legal order in international law: an in- and outside view, in: M. Bungenberg, ed. European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017, pp. 139-203, Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Broekman, J.M., Backer, L.C. (2013). Legal theory and semiotics: the legal semiotics critical approach, in: Lawyers Making Meaning: The Semiotics of Law in Legal Education II, pp. 127-134, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.

Errera, A. (2007). The role of logic in the legal science of the glossators and commentators, in: A. Padovani,

P.G. Stein, eds. A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence: Volume 7: The Jurists’ Philosophy of Law from Rome to the Seventeenth Century, Volume 8: A History of the Philosophy of Law in The Common Law World, 1600-1900, pp. 79-156,

Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.

Frändberg, A. (2014). Legality and legal subordination, in: From Rechtsstaat to Universal Law-State: An Essay in Philosophical Jurisprudence, pp. 59-96, Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Goodrich, P. (1985). Legal hermeneutics; an essay on precedent and interpretation, Liverpool Law Review, VII (2): pp. 99-155.

Grabowski, A. (2013). The postpositivist concept of the validity of statutory law, in: Juristic Concept of the Validity of Statutory Law: A Critique of Contemporary Legal Nonpositivism, Berlin, pp. 359-453, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg.

Hellebuyck, E. (2009). Activist hedge funds and legal strategy devices, in: A. Masson, M.J. Shariff, eds. Legal Strategies: How Corporations Use Law to Improve Performance, pp. 277-292, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Houlgate, L.D. (1998). What is legal intervention in the family? Family Law and Family Privacy, Law and Philosophy. XVII (2): pp. 141-158.

Kosielińska-Grabowska, U., Grabowski, A. (2015). Logic and the directives of legislative technique: some logical remarks on the Polish, in: M. Araszkiewicz, K. Płeszka, eds. Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, pp. 205-223, Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Legal argumentation and concepts of law. (2007). In: Constitutionalism and Legal Reasoning, pp. 43-89, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.

Leith, Ph., Hoey, A. (1998a). Handling legal information, in: The Computerised Lawyer: A Guide to the Use of Computers in the Legal Profession, pp. 23-56, Springer London, London.

Leith, Ph., Hoey, A. (1998b). Primary legal information, in: The Computerised Lawyer: A Guide to the Use of Computers in the Legal Profession, pp. 57-89, Springer London, London.

Lind, D. (2015). The pragmatic value of legal fictions, in: M. Del Mar, W. Twining, eds. Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, pp. 83-109, Springer International Publishing, Cham.

LoPucki, L.M., Weyrauch, W.O. (2009). A theory of legal strategy, in: Legal Strategies: How Corporations Use Law to Improve Performance, eds. Antoine Masson and Mary J Shariff, pp. 41-87, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Mäntysaari, P. (2017). Anomalies of normal legal science, applications of user-friendly legal science, in: User-Friendly Legal Science: A New Scientific Discipline, pp. 159-201, Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Pascuzzi, G. (2016). Cognitive techniques of legal innovation, in: G. Bellantuono, F.T. Lara, eds. Law, Development and Innovation, pp. 15-23, Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Samuel, G. (1991). Epistemology and legal institutions, Revue internationale de semiotique juridique. IV (3): pp. 309-333.