The conciliation of aesthetics and ethics in contemporary animalist art

  • Carmen GUTIÉRREZ-JORDANO Universidad de Sevilla
Keywords: animal maltreatment, animalist art, aesthetics, ethics, conciliation

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of the relationship between aesthetics and ethics in animalist art. The starting point is the affirmation of art as a suitable field to deal with the maltreatment and cruelty that animals receive from human beings. The animals are used by an art without animalistic intention and with symbolic pretensions, or by a properly animalistic art. The main ethical problem that arises concerns animalistic art, which, with the intention of ethically defending animals, treats them cruelly. The method of the work is the hermeneutic interpretation of texts and works of art. The objective is to clarify the problem of the reconciliation of the aesthetic and the ethical in current animalistic art. It is concluded that the solution to the problem of the relationship between aesthetics and ethics lies in the fact that the aesthetic is something internal to the ethical.

Author Biography

Carmen GUTIÉRREZ-JORDANO, Universidad de Sevilla

Graduada en Bellas Artes. Máster en Bellas Artes de la Universidad de Sevilla. Es Contratada de Formación de Profesorado Universitario del Ministerio de ciencia, Innovación y Universidades en el Departamento de Pintura de la Universidad de Sevilla. Docente en este Departamento de Pintura. Algunos de los últimos artículos publicados son: “Arte de contacto interespecies: las prácticas artísticas contemporáneas de cuidado hacia los animales no humanos”, coautoría con Carmen Andreu-Lara, AusArt, 12(2), 2024, 163-173 ; “Una ética empática como fundamento de la apreciación estética no antropomorfista de los animales”, Perseitas, 12, 2024, 246-272 ;  “El pincel como puñal. La estructura dialéctica de la pintura de Tiziano como herida y refugio”, Alpha. Revista de Artes, Letras y Filosofía, nº 57, 2023, 173-196; “La educación del cuidado de la alteridad animal en el arte animalista”, Sonda. Investigación en Artes y Letras, 12, 2023, 58-73; “Pintar pintura. Pintura pura, modernidad y desidealización en el arte de Édouard Manet”. Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, v. XLV, núm. 123, (2023), pp. 151-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iie.18703062e.2023.123.2825

carmengutierrezjordano@gmail.com

References

ACAMPORA, R. (2008). H-Animal thread, February 8. https://networks.h-net.org/h-animal

BAKER, S. (2000). The Postmodern Animal. Reaktion Books.

BAKER, S. (2006). You Kill Things to Look at Them: Animal Death in Contemporary Art. En The Animal Studies Group, Killing Animals (pp. 69-95). University of Illinois Press.

BAKER, S. (2013a). Artist/Animal. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816680665.001.0001

BAKER, S. (2013b). Animals, Artists and the Question of Ethics. University of Minnesota Press, 30 January. http://www.uminnpressblog.com/2013/01/animals-artists-and-question-of-ethics.html

BARTHES, R. (1970). Mythologies (1957). Seuil.

BEUYS, J. (1993). Interview with W. Sharp (1969). En Kuoni, C. (edra.) Energy Plan for the Western Man – Joseph Beuys in America. Writings and Interviews with the Artist (pp. 77-92). Four Walls Eight Windows.

BROGLIO, R. (2011). Surface Encounters: Thinking with Animals and Art. University of Minnesota Press. htttps://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816672967.001.0001

BURT, J. (2002). Animals in Film. Reaktion Books.

CHAPMAN, K. (2003). The Human Zoo. Hatton Gallery, 28 June. http://www.undo.net/it/mostra/14984

CHERRY, D. (2000). Beyond the Frame: Feminism and Visual Culture, Britain, 1850–1900. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203351314

COUSINS, M. (1994). Danger and Safety. Art History, 17(3), 418-423.

CRONIN, J. K. (2018). Art for animals: visual culture and animal advocacy, 1870–1914. The Pennsylvania State University Press. https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gpbw4

DANTO, A. C. (2003). The Abuse of Beauty: Aesthetics and the Concept of Art. Open Court.

DERRIDA, J. (2008). El animal que luego estoy si(gui)endo (2006). Trad. de C. Peretti y C. Rodríguez Marciel. Trotta.

DION, M, (2017). Some Notes Towards a Manifesto for Artists Working With or About the Living World. En Erickson, R. y Dion, M. (eds.) Misadventures of a 21st-Century Naturalist (pp. 84-85). Yale University Press-Institute of Contemporary Art.

GIONI, M. (2007). Where the Wild Things Are. Tate Etc, 11, 35. https://www.tate.org.uk/tate-etc/issue-11-autumn-2007/where-wild-things-are

GRUEN, L. (2015). Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relationships with Animals. Lantern Books.

HANSON, K. (1998). How Bad Can Good Art Be? En Levinson, J. (ed.) Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection (pp. 204-226). Cambridge University Press.

HARAWAY, D. (1978). Animal Sociology and a Natural Economy of the Body Politic, Part II: The Past Is the Contested Zone: Human Nature and Theories of Production and Reproduction in Primate Behavior Studies. Signs, 4(1), 37-60.

HARAWAY, D. (2008). When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press.

HARRIES, M. (2007). Regarding the Pain of Rats: Kim Jones’s Rat Piece. TDR: The Journal of Performance Studies, 51(1), 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1162/dram.2007.51.1.160

HEGEL, G. W. F. (1989). Lecciones sobre la estética (1820-29). Trad. de A. Brotóns. Akal.

KEAN, H. (1998). Animal Rights: Political and Social Change in Britain Since 1800. Reaktion Books.

HORTA, Ó. (2017). Un paso adelante en defensa de los animales. Plaza y Valdés.

KRAUSS, R. (1999). ‘A Voyage on the North Sea’: Art in the Age of the Post-Medium Condition. Thames and Hudson.

LONGSTAFF, S. (2003). Animal Rights and Artistic Freedom. Arts Law Centre of Australia 30 June. http://www.artslaw.com.au/articles/entry/animal-rights-and-artistic-freedom

LOSTEDT, M. (2020). Perttu Saksa’s work on our relationship with the environment. http://www.perttu saksa.com/text1Lummaa

LUHMANN, N. (2005). El arte de la sociedad (1995). Trad. de J Torres. Herder.

MCCAUGHEY, P. (2008). On the Edge. The Australian, 7 June.

MILLER, M. E. (2012). Miru Kim’s Nude Art with Pigs Made Them Sick, Activist Says. Miami New Times, 12 January. http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2012-01-12/news/miru-kim-s-nude-artwith-pigs-made-them-sick-activist-says/full

MITCHELL, W. J. T. (2005). What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001

ORR, D. (2002). The Nature of Design. Ecology, Culture and Human Intention. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195148558.001.0001

PACHIRAT, T. (2011). Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300152685

PLATÓN. (1988). La República. Trad. de C. Eggers Lan. En Platón, Diálogos IV. Gredos.

RIFKIN, J. (2009). The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.

RITCHIN, F. (2013). Bending the Frame: Photojournalism, Documentary, and the Citizen. Aperture.

SINGER, P. (2011). Beyond Animal Liberation. Interview by Giovanni Aloi. Antennae, 19, 9-15.

THOMPSON, N. (2005). Becoming Animal: Contemporary Art in the Animal Kingdom. MIT Press.

TISDALL, C. (2008). Joseph Beuys: Coyote. Thames and Hudson.

WATT, Y. (2011). Artists, Animals and Ethics. Antennae, 19, 62-72.

WILDE, O. (2006). The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890). Oxford University Press.

WOLFE, C. (2010). What is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Published
2025-04-01
How to Cite
GUTIÉRREZ-JORDANO, C. (2025). The conciliation of aesthetics and ethics in contemporary animalist art . Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 30(109), e15098806. Retrieved from https://mail.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/e15098806
Section
Interlocuciones