Emotional responses to corruption across various sectors of society: content and dynamics

Keywords: corruption perception, attitudinal tolerance, university-to-work spectrum, education sector corruption, differential emotions scale, content analysis

Abstract

This article analyzes the content (characteristics and modality) and dynamics of emotional reactions to corruption in education, career, professional life, and society among individuals within the university-to- wok spectrum, in relation to their corresponding attitudes toward corruption. Surveys, content analysis and tests were applied (Izard's Differential Emotions Scale. The results indicate that within the university- work spectrum, the predominant attitudes towards corruption are the relationships of Business Economic Transaction and Instrumental Value. Regardless of the type of attitude, corruption as a social phenomenon elicits negative emotions among all participants (except for students who show neutrality towards corruption perceived as an instrumental value) and specifically in the career and professional fields among working respondents. The nature of emotions fluctuates depending on the attitude towards corruption, its context of manifestation, and the status of the respondents. It is concluded that within the spectrum that goes from university to work, the dynamics of respondents' emotional responses to corruption in education, career and professional fields, and in society in general, is conditioned by their attitude towards corruption, manifesting itself in specific emotional reactions, changes in the nature and modality of
emotions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulla, K. (2021). “Corrosive effects of corruption on human capital and aggregate productivity”. Kyklos, 74 (4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12279

Abun, D., Encarnacion, M. J., Magallanes, T., & Lalaine, S. (2020). “Students’ attitude toward corruption and their behavioural intention to corrupt or not to corrupt in the future: The Philippines’ context”. Journal of the Social Sciences, 23 (1), 78-98.

d’Agostino, G., & Pieroni, L. (2019). “Modelling corruption perceptions: Evidence from eastern Europe and central Asian countries”. Social Indicators Research, 142, 311-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1886-3

De Waele, L., Weißmüller, K. S., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2021). “Bribery and the role of public service moti-vation and social value orientation: A multi-site experimental study in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands”. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655964

Dzhaneryan, S. T., & Gvozdeva, D. I. (2020). Soderzhaniye i sformirovannost' tipov tsennostno-smyslovogo otnosheniya k nizovoy korruptsii v forme vzyatochnichestva u gorodskoy uchashcheysya molodezhi [The content and formation of the types of value-semantic attitude to bottom corruption in the form of bribery among urban student youth]. Moscow: Publishing house "Znanie-M".

Dzhaneryan, S. T., Gvozdeva, D. I., & Astafyeva, I. N. (2016). “Understanding of the causes of bribery by students with various types of attitude to bribery”. The Social Sciences, 11 (S3), 6459-6464.

Fan, I. B. (2019). Korruptsiya kak problema politicheskoy antropologii [Corruption as a problem of political anthropology]. In: Rudenko, V. N. (Ed.) Actual problems of scientific support of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of combating corruption: A collection of works on the results of the third all-Russian scientific conference with international participation, IPLUBRAS, 26-27 October 2018, Ekaterinburg, Russia (pp. 349-368). Ekaterinburg: Institute of Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17506/articles.anticorruption.2018.349368

Fischer, R., Ferreira, M. C., Milfont, T., & Pilati, R. (2014). “Culture of corruption? The effects of priming corruption images in a high corruption context”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45 (10), 1594-1605. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022022114548874

Gavelis, V. (2012). “An economic approach to corruption types”. Economics, Political Science, 91, 4.

Gutiérrez, J. G., Saiz-Álvarez, J. M., & Ángel, G. (2017). “A cognitive, emotional and behavioral assessment of Colombian entrepreneurs’ attitudes toward corruption”. Universidad & Empresa, 19 (33), 9-51. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/empresa/a.4682

Guvenli, T., & Sanyal, R. (2012). “Perception and understanding of bribery in international business”. Ethics and Behavior, 22 (5), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.706140

Harris, G., & van der Merwe, A. D. (2012). “The scope for mobilizing public opinion against corruption: The attitudes of Kwazulu-Natal university students”. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 15 (3), a301. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v15i3.301

Harris, N. F., & Bastedo, M. N. (2011). Corruption at the top: Ethical dilemmas in college and university governance. In: Gallant, T. B. (Ed.) Creating the ethical academy: A systems approach to understanding misconduct and empowering change in higher education. New York: Routledge.

Izard, C. E. (2010). “The many meanings/aspects of emotion: Definitions, functions, activation, and regulation”. Emotion Review, 2 (4), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910374661

Karpova, E. B., Isurina, G. L., & Zhuravlev, A. L. (2020). “Psychology of relations by V. N. Miasishchev: Origins and contents”. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 41 (2), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920008488-2

Kondrashov, P. N. (2016). “Dinamika zhiznennykh tsennosteĭ podrostkov i problema korruptsii v postsovetskoĭ Rossii” [“Dynamics of vital values of adolescents and a problem of corruption in post-soviet Russia”]. The Education and Science Journal, 6, 22-41. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2016-6-22-41

Li, C., Liu, L., Zheng, W., Dang, J., & Liang, Y. (2019). “A clean self reduces bribery intent”. International Journal of Psychology, 54 (2), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12452

McGee, R. W., Benk, S., & Yüzbaşı, D. (2015). “Religion and ethical attitudes toward accepting a bribe: A comparative study”. Religions, 6 (4), 1168-1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6041168

Nikolaev, S. M. (2019). “Modeling of cadets' preparation in educational establishments of higher education of the penitentiary system for anti-corruption activities”. Espacios, 40 (29), 3.

Parra, D., Muñoz-Herrera, M., & Palacio, L. A. (2021). “The limits of transparency in reducing corruption”. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 95 (C), 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101762

Prasad, M., da Silva, M. B. M., & Nickow, A. (2019). “Approaches to corruption: A synthesis of the scholarship”. Studies in Comparative International Development, 54 (1), 96-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9275-0

Tanner, C., Linder, S., & Sohn, M. (2022). “Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? Experimental evidence from a bribery game”. Plos One, 17 (1), e0262201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262201

Vannovskaia, O. V. (2009). “Problema korruptsii v psikhologicheskoy fenomenologii” [“The problem of corruption in psychological phenomenology”]. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University, 3 (2), 54-62 (2009). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problema-korruptsii-v-psihologicheskoy-fenomenologii/viewer

Yurov, I. A. (2015). “S.L. Rubinshteyn: Dialektiko-materialisticheskaya i gumanisticheskaya psikhologii” [“S.L. Rubinstein: Dialectical-materialistic and humanistic”]. Psychologist, 4, 37-84. https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-
8701.2015.4.15394

Zhuravlev, A. L., & Kitova, D. A. (2022). “The attitude of youth to corruption as a manifestation of the economic mentality of Russians”. Psychology and Law, 12 (2), 178-193. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120213
Published
2024-05-08
How to Cite
Dzhaneryan , S., Gvozdeva, D., Gabdulina, L., Belova, E., & Kim, A. (2024). Emotional responses to corruption across various sectors of society: content and dynamics. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 14(3), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11154833