Nekate application: an innovative and sustainable solution for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda larvae in modern agriculture

  • Luis Cagua-Montaño State University of Milagro
  • Betty Pazmiño-Gómez State University of Milagro
  • Milena Acosta Farías Quevedo State Technical University
  • Alfonso Jiménez-Gurumendi Milagro State University
  • Malavé Reyes Milagro State University
  • Valeria Orozco-Siranaula Milagro State University
  • Job Andrade-Ávila Saint Therese of the Child Jesus Educational Unit, Ecuador.
Keywords: Azadirachtin, Azadirachta indica,, biological control, Spodoptera frugiperda, phytochemical screening.

Abstract

The insecticidal and acaricidal effects of applying NEKATE (an extract of neem leaves, cinnamon, garlic, chili, green tea, nettle, thyme, and oregano) are used as a sustainable alternative to synthetic insecticides for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda. These are the safest and most environmentally friendly pest control methods. NEKATE is emerging as a promising alternative for managing Spodoptera frugiperda, a highly destructive pest that causes significant economic losses in agriculture. This species has also developed a notable resistance to conventional insecticides, making it difficult to manage within integrated pest management programs. The importance of NEKATE lies in the presence of azadirachtin, its main active compound, recognized for its insecticidal, repellent, and insect growth-regulating properties. The present study aimed to evaluate the extract’s efficacy on S. frugiperda larvae. The methodology included larval collection, preparation of the aqueous extract, phytochemical characterization through preliminary screening, and evaluation of insecticidal efficacy using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) detection. The results indicated that treatment T1, corresponding to a 75% aqueous extract concentration, achieved the highest efficacy, with 66.67% larval mortality at 80 hours post-treatment. In comparison, treatments T2 (50%) and T3 (25%) had significantly lower mortality rates, at 24.7% and 11.13%, respectively. These findings suggest that
high concentrations of the extract could constitute an effective and sustainable tool for managing S.
frugiperda, thus reducing dependence on synthetic insecticides.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abang, A. F., Nanga, S. N., Fotso Kuate, A., Kouebou, C., Suh, C., Masso, C., . & Fiaboe, K. K. M. (2021). Natural enemies of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in different agro-ecologies. Insects, 12(6), 509. https://www.mdpi.com/2075- 4450/12/6/509

Abbas, A., Ullah, F., Hafeez, M., Han, X., Dara, M. Z. N., Gul, H., & Zhao, C. R. (2022). Biological control of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Agronomy, 12(11), 2704. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/11/2704

Abbott WS. (1925). A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265-267.

Bamisile, B. S., Akutse, K. S., Siddiqui, J. A., & Xu, Y. (2021). Model application of entomopathogenic fungi as alternatives to chemical pesticides: Prospects, challenges, and insights for next-generation sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 741804. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.741804/full

Bateman, M. L., Day, R. K., Luke, B., Edgington, S., Kuhlmann, U., & Cock, M. J. (2018). Assessment of potential biopesticide options for managing fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Africa. Journal of applied entomology, 142(9), 805-819. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jen.12565

Karakkottil, P., Pulamte, L., & Kumar, V. (2024). Strategic analysis of collaborative networks in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) research for improved pest management strategies. Neotropical Entomology, 53(4), 9 3 7 - 954. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13744-024-01146-5

Reavey, C. E., Walker, A. S., Joyce, S. P., Broom, L., Willse, A., Ercit, K., ... & Matzen, K. J. (2022). Self-limiting fall armyworm: a new approach in development for sustainable crop protection and resistance management. BMC biotechnology, 22(1), 1-16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12896-022-00735-9

Tay, W. T., Meagher Jr, R. L., Czepak, C., & Groot, A. T. (2023). Spodoptera frugiperda: ecology, evolution, and management options of an invasive species. Annual Review of Entomology, 68(1), 299-317. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-102548

Tepa-Yotto, G. T., Chinwada, P., Rwomushana, I., Goergen, G., & Subramanian, S. (2022). Integrated management of Spodoptera frugiperda 6 years post detection in Africa: a review. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 52, 100928. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574522000633
Published
2025-06-29
How to Cite
Cagua-Montaño, L., Pazmiño-Gómez, B., Acosta Farías, M., Jiménez-Gurumendi, A., Reyes, M., Orozco-Siranaula, V., & Andrade-Ávila, J. (2025). Nekate application: an innovative and sustainable solution for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda larvae in modern agriculture. REDIELUZ, 15(1), 85 - 92. https://doi.org/10.5281/10.5281/zenodo.15748566
Section
Ciencias Exactas, Naturales y Agropecuarias