La experiencia de los países de la UE en el desarrollo de infraestructura y centros logísticos

• Valeria Slatvinska International humanitarian universityu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6082-981X
• Olha Kibik National University “Odessa Law Academy” https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9587-578X
• Svitlana Oneshko Odessa National Maritime University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-3984
• Serhii Fesak Educational and Scientific lnstitute of Public Administration "Karazin Kharkiv National University" https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8530-9976

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46925//rdluz.36.24

Palabras clave: Infraestructura de transporte, transporte público, Economía del transporte, planificación del transporte

Resumen

El objetivo del estudio es evaluar el desarrollo de la infraestructura y los centros logísticos utilizando el ejemplo de los países de la UE, a saber: Alemania, España y Polonia. La metodología se basa en un análisis comparativo de los indicadores de desarrollo de los hubs de infraestructura en Alemania, España y Polonia según InfraCompass. Resultados. La política y estrategia general de la UE como institución supranacional determina los objetivos estratégicos y las políticas de Alemania, España y Polonia en el ámbito del desarrollo de infraestructuras y logística. La UE ofrece incentivos financieros, apoyo político y administrativo para centros de infraestructura y logística. Según los resultados de la investigación, Alemania, España y Polonia tienen puntos fuertes comunes que contribuyen al desarrollo de la infraestructura: contratación pública justa y transparente, un buen sistema de protección frente a la insolvencia (Alemania y Polonia), una alta calificación crediticia (Alemania) y estabilidad financiera (Polonia). Los factores generales del desarrollo de las instalaciones de infraestructura son: en Alemania - el desarrollo de los centros de infraestructura está asegurado por un marco regulatorio efectivo y reglas establecidas para la concesión de permisos, un sistema legal de calidad, un sector financiero estable; en España - marco regulatorio eficaz, herramientas eficaces de administración pública; en Polonia: el marco regulatorio y los sistemas de gestión de la infraestructura.

Citas

CEC (2006). Communication from the Commission: Keep Europe moving – Sustainable Mobility for our Continent. Mid-term Review of the European Commission’s 2001 Transport White Paper. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

CEC (2007). Communication from the Commission: Freight Transport Logistics Action Plan Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

CEC (2009). Communication from the Commission: A Sustainable Future for Transport: Towards an Integrated, Technology-led and user Friendly System Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

Çeviköz, Ü. (2016). Could Turkey become a new energy trade hub in South East Europe. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 15(2), 67-76. http://turkishpolicy.com/article/813/could- turkey-become-a-new-energy-trade-hub-in-south-east-europe

Crescenzi, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2008). Infrastructure endowment and investment as determinants of regional growth in the European Union. Eib Papers, 13(2), 62-101. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/44893

Deutscher Bundestag (2016). Entschließungsantrag. Drucksache 18/10535. Available at: https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/18/105/1810535.pdf

EC (2011). White Paper on Transport: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a Competitive and Resource-efficient Transport System. European Commission, Brussels.

Funke, S. Á., Plötz, P., & Wietschel, M. (2019). Invest in fast-charging infrastructure or in longer battery ranges? A cost-efficiency comparison for Germany. Applied energy, 235, 888-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.134

InfraCompass (2021). Available at: https://infracompass.gihub.org/compare-countries/?country=DEU%2cESP%2cPOL

Kreutzberger, E. (2010). Lowest cost intermodal rail freight transport bundling networks: conceptual structuring and identification. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2010.10.2.2880

Kreutzberger, E. (2016). Intermodaal railvervoer moet innoveren: Vergelijking van de voordelen van schaalvergroting of omloopversnelling in de innovatieprojecten Marathon, Spider, Twin hub en Spectrum. In Colloquium Vervoersplanologisch Speurwerk 2016. https://research.tudelft.nl/en/publications/intermodaal-railvervoer-moet-innoveren- vergelijking-van-de-voorde

Kreutzberger, E., & Konings, R. (2016). The challenge of appropriate hub terminal and hub- and-spoke network development for seaports and intermodal rail transport in Europe. Research in transportation business & management, 19, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.05.003

Mindur, L., & Hajdul, M. (2011). The concept of intermodal network development in Poland using multi-agent systems. Transport problems, 6, 5-16.

Morin, P., Krieger, M., Durand, D., Puillat, I., & Farcy, P. (2015). The Joint European Research Infrastructure Network for Coastal Observatories: Achievements and Strategy for the Future. https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00349/46022/

Ortega, A., de los Angeles Baeza, M., & Vassallo, J. M. (2015). Contractual PPPs for Transport Infrastructure in Spain: Lessons from the Economic Recession. Transport Reviews, 36(2), 187– 206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1076904

Outlook (2017). Global Infrastructure Hub. Global Infrastructure Outlook & InfraCompass. Available at: https://cdn.gihub.org/umbraco/media/1652/20170913-ipfa-presentation- outlook-compass.pdf

Perez-Montiel, J. & Manera, C. (2021), Government public infrastructure investment and economic performance in Spain (1980-2016). Applied Economic Analysis, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEA-03-2021-0077

Rodríguez-Pose, A., Crescenzi, R., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Government quality and the economic returns of transport infrastructure investment in European regions. http://institute.eib.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Luxembourg-2016-Rodríguez-Pose.pdf

Romberg, H. H. (1996). Berlin-developing a hub for eastern Europe. In Airport capacity and development funding (pp. 222-234). Thomas Telford Publishing.

Romero, M. J., & Van Waeyenberge, E. (2020). Beyond typologies: What is a Public Private Partnership?. In Critical Reflections on Public Private Partnerships (pp. 39-63). Routledge.

Rutherford, J. (2005). Networks in cities, cities in networks: territory and globalisation intertwined in telecommunications infrastructure development in Europe. Urban Studies, 42(13), 2389-2406.

Schenk, R. J. (2019). Transportation Infrastructure Policy in Germany. International Public Policy Association, ICPP4, Montr´eal 2019 Panel: Public Policy and Diversity in Federations. https://www.ippapublicpolicy.org/file/paper/5d10d16fdbc60.pdf

Schmidt, C. (2013). Hamburg-northern Europe's logistics hub: gateway to the world-hub for Europe. Available at: https://epub.sub.uni-hamburg.de/epub/volltexte/2014/35439/pdf/Standortbroschuere_2013_englisch_RL5.pdf

Thierstein, A., & Conventz, S. (2014). Hub Airports, the knowledge economy and how close is close? Evidence from Europe. 54th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional development & globalisation: Best practices", 26-29 August 2014, St. Petersburg, Russia

World Bank (2021a). Cost of business start-up procedures (% of GNI per capita). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.REG.COST.PC.ZS

World Bank (2021b). Time to resolve insolvency (years) – Poland. Available at:
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.ISV.DURS?locations=PL

Zakrzewski, B., & Nowacki, G. (2016). Pan-European Transport Corridor No. 2 and the development potential of Mazovia municipalities. Autobusy: technika, eksploatacja, systemy transportowe, 17.

Zhang, M., Janic, M., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2015). A freight transport optimization model for integrated network, service, and policy design. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 77, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.02.013

Zhou, T., Tan, R., & Sedlin, T. (2018). Planning Modes for Major Transportation Infrastructure Projects (MTIPs): Comparing China and Germany. Sustainability, 10(10), 3401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103401