Suppliers selection in a public institution: A sustainable and hierarchical approach
Palabras clave:
Supply chain, environmental sustainability, economic sustainability, AHP approach
Resumen
This research analyzes the procurement supply chain management of a Peruvian public institution, using the AHP approach and sustainable supplier selection criteria. The sample included 7,833 employees of the purchasing department, including managers, administrators, assistants and collaborators. The analysis revealed 5 subgroups, the largest representing 28.04% and standing out for its emphasis on the environmental factor with an average of 62.85%. The subfactors of economic sustainability, product useful life and maintenance cost did not show significant differences in weighting, with a high average impact, 11.69% and 11.76% respectively. Therefore, companies seeking to supply these municipalities must focus on offering solutions with low maintenance costs and long useful lives to ensure economic sustainability. These results support the effectiveness of the AHP method in identifying critical factors in decision making.
Citas
Aguilar, S. (2005). Fórmulas para el cálculo de la muestra en investigaciones de salud. Salud en Tabasco, 11(1-2), 333-338. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=48711206
Ahí, P. & Searcy, C (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
Akhrouf, M. & Derghoum, M. (2023). Use of Analytic Hierarchy Process model for selection of health infrastructure projects. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v15i1.1040.
Ali, A., Bentley, Y., Cao, G., & Habib, F. (2017). Green supply chain management–food for thought? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(1), 22-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1226788
Alzate, M., Calle, L. & Muriel, Y. (2020). Identificación de estrategias para implementar en la cadena de suministros sostenible en la industria química en Antioquia, [Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria. Medellín- Colombia]. https://dspace.tdea.edu.co/bitstream/handle/tdea/1716/32.%20TGII%20Bustamante%2C%20Palacio%20y%20Calle%20Estrategias%20cadena%20suministro%20sostenible%20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput, 12(6), 1668–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023
Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Passaro, R. (2009). The Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Supplier Selection Problem. Proceedings of 10th Annual International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, USA.
Bustillos, L., & Carballo, J. (2018). La gestión de la cadena de suministro y su impacto en el desempeño empresarial: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista de Administración, Contabilidad y Economía, 16(1), \ 63-83. https://doi.org/10.22320/S07179103/2018.14.
Carter, C. R., Hatton, M. R., Wu, C., & Chen, X. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management: continuing evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 50(1), 122-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0056
Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.
Forman, E. (2001). Decision by Objectives - How to convince others that you are right. River Edge, World Scientific Publishing.
Ghayebloo, S., Tarokh, M. J., Venkatadri, U., & Diallo, C. (2015). Developing a bi-objective model of the closed-loop supply chain network with green supplier selection and disassembly of products: The impact of parts reliability and product greenness on the recovery network. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.02.011
Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, L. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. (6ta. ed.). McGRAW-HILL.
Huang, Y. y Keskar, H. (2007). A multi-criteria decision-making approach for supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4257-4274.
Huo, B., Qi, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2014). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: The moderating role of competitive strategy. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-03-2013-0096
Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag.
Ilbahar, E., Kahraman, C., & Cebi, S. (2022). Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP. Energy (Oxford, England), 239(121907), 121907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121907
Jamal, T., Urmee, T.& Shafiullah, G. (2020), Planning of off-grid power supply systems in remote areas using multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy, 201, 117580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117580.
Jurík, L., Horňáková, N., Šantavá, E., Cagáňová, D., & Sablik, J. (2022). Application of AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless Networks, 28(2), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02322-2
Kabir, G., Ahmed, S., Aalirezaei, A. & Ng, K. (2022), Benchmarking Canadian solid waste management system integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with efficacy methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(34), 51578-51588.
Khan, A., & Ali, Y. (2020). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process methods and their applications: a twenty-year review from 2000-2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i3.822
Kim, B., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2019). Evaluation model for investment in solar photovoltaic power generation using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Sustainability, 11(10), 2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102905
Kuczynski, P. P. & Thorne, A. (2017, March 19). Decreto Supremo que modifica el Reglamento de la Ley N.º 30225, Ley de Contrataciones del Estado, aprobado por el Decreto Supremo N.º 350-2015-EF. El Peruano, pp. 5-50. http://portal.osce.gob.pe/osce/sites/ default/files/Documentos/legislacion/ley/2017- Reg_DL1341/DS-056-MODIFICACIONES%20 AL%20REGLAMENTO%20LEY%2030225.pdf
Kuse, H., Endo, H. & Iwao, E. 2010. Logistics facility, road network and district planning: Establishing comprehensive planning for city logistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 6251-6263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2010.04.035
Kushwaha, G. (2010). Sustainable development through strategic green supply chain management. International Journal of Engineering and Management Science, 1(1), 7-11. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1053.4639&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Ley 28611 de 2005. Ley General del Ambiente, (2005). https://www.minam.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Ley-N%C2%B0-28611.pdf
Ley No. 1017. Ley de Contrataciones del Estado y su Reglamento. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/osce/normas-legales/246545-1017-ley-de-contrataciones-del-estado-y-su-reglamento
Mendoza, A., Santiago, R., & Ravi, A. (2008). A multi-objective optimization model for supply chain design considering risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.008
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (2019). Producción y Consumo Sostenible. Home: Minambiente. https://www.minambiente.gov.co/asuntos-ambientales-sectorial-y-urbana/produccion-y-consumo-sostenible/
Moghadam, S.T. & Lombardi, P. (2019), An interactive multi-criteria spatial decision support system for energy retrofitting of building stocks using communtiyVIZ to support urban energy planning. Building and Environment, 163, 106233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106233.
Mohammady, S. (2006). An Analytic Hierarchy Process-based Multi-criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection. International Journal of Production Research, 44(9), 1819-1841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500520491
Moustakas, K., Loizidou, M., Rehan, M. & Nizami, A.S. (2020), A review of recent developments in renewable and sustainable energy systems: Key challenges and future perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109418
Olson, D. L. (1996). The analytic hierarchy process. En Decision Aids for Selection Problems (pp. 49–68). Springer New York.
Poveda, C. (2023). Using multi-criteria decision-making to assess the importance of human capital in meeting the goals and objectives of sustainable development: An application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp. v15i1.1067.
Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T. (1997). Toma de decisiones para líderes: El proceso analítico jerárquico. La toma de decisiones en un mundo complejo. RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2017). A state-of-art survey on project selection using MCDM techniques. Journal of project management, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2017.6.001
Sánchez, H., & Reyes, C. (2015). Método Científico. Planificación de la investigación. (5ta. Ed). Business Support Anneth SRL.
Sarache, W., Costa, Y., & Martínez, J. (2019). Evaluación del desempeño ambiental bajo enfoque de cadena de abastecimiento verde. DYNA, 82(189), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n189.48550
Seuring, S. & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of leaner production, 16(15), 1699-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro .2008.04.020
Silva, J. (2017). Gestión de la cadena de suministro: una revisión desde la logística y el medio ambiente. Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería, 11(22), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.31908/19098367.3549.
Silvestre, B. S. (2015). A hard nut to crack! Implementing supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.009
Strantzali, E., & Aravossis, K. (2016). Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 885–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021
Yang, M., Ji, Z., Zhang, L., Zhang, A. & Xia, Y. (2022), A hybrid comprehensive performance evaluation approach of cutter holder for tunnel boring machine. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 52, 101546.
Zanghelini, G.M., Cherubini, E. & Soares, S.R. (2018), How multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is aiding life cycle assessment (LCA) in results interpretation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 609-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.10.230
Zhou, X. (2012). Fuzzy analytical network process implementation with matlab. En MATLAB - A Fundamental Tool for Scientific Computing and Engineering Applications - Volume 3. InTech.
Zhu, Y., Tan, J., Cao, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q. & Liu, Q. (2022), Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in environmental economics education: Under the online and offline blended teaching mode. Sustainability, 14(4), 2414.
Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016). Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1412–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340
Ahí, P. & Searcy, C (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
Akhrouf, M. & Derghoum, M. (2023). Use of Analytic Hierarchy Process model for selection of health infrastructure projects. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v15i1.1040.
Ali, A., Bentley, Y., Cao, G., & Habib, F. (2017). Green supply chain management–food for thought? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(1), 22-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1226788
Alzate, M., Calle, L. & Muriel, Y. (2020). Identificación de estrategias para implementar en la cadena de suministros sostenible en la industria química en Antioquia, [Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria. Medellín- Colombia]. https://dspace.tdea.edu.co/bitstream/handle/tdea/1716/32.%20TGII%20Bustamante%2C%20Palacio%20y%20Calle%20Estrategias%20cadena%20suministro%20sostenible%20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput, 12(6), 1668–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023
Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Passaro, R. (2009). The Analytic Hierarchy Process in the Supplier Selection Problem. Proceedings of 10th Annual International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Pittsburgh, USA.
Bustillos, L., & Carballo, J. (2018). La gestión de la cadena de suministro y su impacto en el desempeño empresarial: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista de Administración, Contabilidad y Economía, 16(1), \ 63-83. https://doi.org/10.22320/S07179103/2018.14.
Carter, C. R., Hatton, M. R., Wu, C., & Chen, X. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management: continuing evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 50(1), 122-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0056
Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.
Forman, E. (2001). Decision by Objectives - How to convince others that you are right. River Edge, World Scientific Publishing.
Ghayebloo, S., Tarokh, M. J., Venkatadri, U., & Diallo, C. (2015). Developing a bi-objective model of the closed-loop supply chain network with green supplier selection and disassembly of products: The impact of parts reliability and product greenness on the recovery network. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.02.011
Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, L. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. (6ta. ed.). McGRAW-HILL.
Huang, Y. y Keskar, H. (2007). A multi-criteria decision-making approach for supplier evaluation and selection. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4257-4274.
Huo, B., Qi, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2014). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: The moderating role of competitive strategy. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-03-2013-0096
Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag.
Ilbahar, E., Kahraman, C., & Cebi, S. (2022). Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP. Energy (Oxford, England), 239(121907), 121907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121907
Jamal, T., Urmee, T.& Shafiullah, G. (2020), Planning of off-grid power supply systems in remote areas using multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy, 201, 117580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117580.
Jurík, L., Horňáková, N., Šantavá, E., Cagáňová, D., & Sablik, J. (2022). Application of AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless Networks, 28(2), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02322-2
Kabir, G., Ahmed, S., Aalirezaei, A. & Ng, K. (2022), Benchmarking Canadian solid waste management system integrating fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) with efficacy methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(34), 51578-51588.
Khan, A., & Ali, Y. (2020). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process methods and their applications: a twenty-year review from 2000-2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i3.822
Kim, B., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2019). Evaluation model for investment in solar photovoltaic power generation using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Sustainability, 11(10), 2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102905
Kuczynski, P. P. & Thorne, A. (2017, March 19). Decreto Supremo que modifica el Reglamento de la Ley N.º 30225, Ley de Contrataciones del Estado, aprobado por el Decreto Supremo N.º 350-2015-EF. El Peruano, pp. 5-50. http://portal.osce.gob.pe/osce/sites/ default/files/Documentos/legislacion/ley/2017- Reg_DL1341/DS-056-MODIFICACIONES%20 AL%20REGLAMENTO%20LEY%2030225.pdf
Kuse, H., Endo, H. & Iwao, E. 2010. Logistics facility, road network and district planning: Establishing comprehensive planning for city logistics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 6251-6263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2010.04.035
Kushwaha, G. (2010). Sustainable development through strategic green supply chain management. International Journal of Engineering and Management Science, 1(1), 7-11. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1053.4639&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Ley 28611 de 2005. Ley General del Ambiente, (2005). https://www.minam.gob.pe/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Ley-N%C2%B0-28611.pdf
Ley No. 1017. Ley de Contrataciones del Estado y su Reglamento. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/osce/normas-legales/246545-1017-ley-de-contrataciones-del-estado-y-su-reglamento
Mendoza, A., Santiago, R., & Ravi, A. (2008). A multi-objective optimization model for supply chain design considering risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.008
Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible (2019). Producción y Consumo Sostenible. Home: Minambiente. https://www.minambiente.gov.co/asuntos-ambientales-sectorial-y-urbana/produccion-y-consumo-sostenible/
Moghadam, S.T. & Lombardi, P. (2019), An interactive multi-criteria spatial decision support system for energy retrofitting of building stocks using communtiyVIZ to support urban energy planning. Building and Environment, 163, 106233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106233.
Mohammady, S. (2006). An Analytic Hierarchy Process-based Multi-criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection. International Journal of Production Research, 44(9), 1819-1841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500520491
Moustakas, K., Loizidou, M., Rehan, M. & Nizami, A.S. (2020), A review of recent developments in renewable and sustainable energy systems: Key challenges and future perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 109418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109418
Olson, D. L. (1996). The analytic hierarchy process. En Decision Aids for Selection Problems (pp. 49–68). Springer New York.
Poveda, C. (2023). Using multi-criteria decision-making to assess the importance of human capital in meeting the goals and objectives of sustainable development: An application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 15(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp. v15i1.1067.
Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T. (1997). Toma de decisiones para líderes: El proceso analítico jerárquico. La toma de decisiones en un mundo complejo. RWS Publications.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Sadi-Nezhad, S. (2017). A state-of-art survey on project selection using MCDM techniques. Journal of project management, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2017.6.001
Sánchez, H., & Reyes, C. (2015). Método Científico. Planificación de la investigación. (5ta. Ed). Business Support Anneth SRL.
Sarache, W., Costa, Y., & Martínez, J. (2019). Evaluación del desempeño ambiental bajo enfoque de cadena de abastecimiento verde. DYNA, 82(189), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n189.48550
Seuring, S. & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of leaner production, 16(15), 1699-1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro .2008.04.020
Silva, J. (2017). Gestión de la cadena de suministro: una revisión desde la logística y el medio ambiente. Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería, 11(22), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.31908/19098367.3549.
Silvestre, B. S. (2015). A hard nut to crack! Implementing supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.009
Strantzali, E., & Aravossis, K. (2016). Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 885–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021
Yang, M., Ji, Z., Zhang, L., Zhang, A. & Xia, Y. (2022), A hybrid comprehensive performance evaluation approach of cutter holder for tunnel boring machine. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 52, 101546.
Zanghelini, G.M., Cherubini, E. & Soares, S.R. (2018), How multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is aiding life cycle assessment (LCA) in results interpretation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 609-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.10.230
Zhou, X. (2012). Fuzzy analytical network process implementation with matlab. En MATLAB - A Fundamental Tool for Scientific Computing and Engineering Applications - Volume 3. InTech.
Zhu, Y., Tan, J., Cao, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Q. & Liu, Q. (2022), Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in environmental economics education: Under the online and offline blended teaching mode. Sustainability, 14(4), 2414.
Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016). Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1412–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1079340
Publicado
2023-12-06
Cómo citar
Castillo Salazar, R. N. (2023). Suppliers selection in a public institution: A sustainable and hierarchical approach. Revista Venezolana De Gerencia, 28(10), 1541-1559. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.28.e10.41
Sección
Artículos
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
.png)
