Conceptualization of Manggarai society on power relationship in marriage kinship
Resumen
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the conceptualization of Manggarai society on power relationship between wife giver and wife taker in marriage kinship. The theoretical framework used in the study is eclectic as it amalgamates a number of conceptions proposed in social anthropology, sociolinguistics and cultural linguistics. The relationship of power between Anak Rona (wife giver) and Anak Wina (wife taker) is asymmetrical, as the Anak Rona as wife giver holds higher power than the Anak Wina as wife taker. The asymmetrical relationship of their power is realised in the forms and meanings of the language they employ in many verbal expressions.
RESUMEN
Este estudio investiga la conceptualización de la sociedad Manggarai sobre la relación de poder entre la esposa dadora de familia y la esposa tomadora de familia en el parentesco matrimonial. El marco teórico utilizado en el estudio es ecléctico, ya que combina varias concepciones propuestas en antropología social, sociolingüística y lingüística cultural. La relación de poder entre anak rona (esposa dadora) y anak wina (esposa tomadora) es asimétrica, ya que anak rona como esposa dadora tiene mayor poder que la anak wina como esposa tomadora. La relación asimétrica de su poder se realiza en las formas y significados del lenguaje que emplean en muchas expresiones verbales.
Citas
ANTONIUS, D, WAHYU, Y (2020). “Nempung Messages in Communication Manggarai Traditional Marriage: Case Study of Three Clay Events on Communication Manggarai Traditional Marriage in Kupang City, NTT, Indonesia.” Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), pp.265-281.
BOVENSIEPEN, JM (2018). “The land of gold: Post-conflict recovery and cultural revival in independent Timor-Leste.” New York: Cornell University Press.
BROWN, HD (1994). “Principles of Language Learning and Teaching.” New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall Regents.
BUSTAN, F, BIRE, J (2018). “The forms and meanings of baby birth, cultural discourse in manggarai language.” Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 14, pp.912-934.
BUSTAN, F, BIRE, J (2018). “The forms and meanings of baby birth cultural discourse in Manggarai language”. In Opcion Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales. 34(14), pp.18-29.
BUSTAN, F, BIRE, J, SEMIUN, A (2017). “The Features of Anthropomorphic Metaphor in the Manggarai Language.” Balti: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
DA SILVA, P (2017). “Cultural Identity: Taboos in Rituals in Makasae Speech Community of Timor-Leste” (Doctoral dissertation, University of Canberra, Australia).
DURANTI, A (1997). “Linguistic Anthropology.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FOERTSCH, CR (2016). “Educational Migration in Indonesia: An Ethnography of Eastern Indonesian Students in Malang”, Java, Indonesia: Java Publication.
FOLEY, WA (1997). “Anthropological Linguistics: an Introduction.” Oxford: Blackwell Publication.
FORTH, G (2016). “Why the Porcupine is not a Bird: Explorations in the Folk Zoology of an Eastern Indonesian people.” Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
GOODENOUGH, WH (1964). “Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology.” New York: Harper & Row Publication.
HAMBERGER, K, ALLERTON, C, BARRY, L, BENNARDO, G, DRUCKER-BROWN, S, READ, DW (2018). “Topology and Kinship: Description or Explanation?.” Current Anthropology, 59(5), 14-27.
KEESING, RM (1981). “Theories of culture. Dalam Language, Culture and Cognition: Anthropological Perspectives. Edited by Ronald W. Casson.” New York: Macmilan Publication.
KRAMSCH, K (2001). “Language and culture.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KUSHNICK, G, FESSLER, DM, ZUSKA, F (2016). “Disgust, Gender, and Social Change.” Human Nature, 27(4), pp.533-555.
LON, YS (2019). “The Legality of Marriage According to Customary, Religion and State Laws: Impacts on Married Couples and Children in Manggarai.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 19(2), pp.302-317.
LON, YS, WIDYAWATI, F (2018). “Bride-Wealth: Is There Respect for Women in Manggarai, Eastern Indonesia?.” Jurnal Humaniora, 30(3), pp.271-278.
MULYANA, D (2002). “Qualitative Research Methodology: New Paradigms of Communication Studies and other Social Sciences.” Bandung, Indonesia: Teen Rosdakarya Publication.
NG, SH, JAMES, JB (1993). “Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Institution.” London: SAGE Publications.
OCHS, E (1988). “Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SAPIR, E (1949). “Culture, Language and Personality. David G. Mandelbaum (Ed.).” Berkeley: University of California Press.
STOLZ, R (2019). “Making Aspirations Concrete? ʻGood Houses' and Mockery in Upland Laos.” Ethnos journal, 83, pp.1-18.
VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J; RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R & DÍAZ-CID, L (2019). “Bioética y biopoder: Perspectivas para una praxis pedagógica desde la ética de Álvaro Márquez-Fernández”. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, Revista Internacional de Filosofía y Teoría Social, 24(87), pp. 65-77.
VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J & RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R (2018). “El derecho a la autobiografía: dimensión ius-filosófica desde la perspectiva de H. Arendt y P. Ricoeur”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 34(18), pp. 1012-1587.
WARDAUGH, R (2011). “An Introduction to Sociolinguistics.” New Jersey, United States: Wiley-Blackwell.
WHORF, BL (2001). “The relationship of habitual thought and behavior to language”. In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Edited by Alessandro Duranti.” Massachussets: Blackwell Publishers.