CONOCER IGUAL A HACER: UNA MIRADA A LA CONSTRUCCIÓN INTER Y TRANSDISCIPLINAR DESDE LA BIOLOGÍA DEL CONOCER
Knowing equals doing: a look at the inter and transdisciplinary construction from the Biology of Cognition
Resumen
La progresiva complejidad de los problemas y desafíos que deben enfrentar nuestras sociedades contemporáneas, exige la necesidad de soluciones complejas que incorporen marcos de análisis que posibiliten un diseño integral de lo observado y por tanto de lo construido. En este trabajo el esfuerzo va precisamente en esa dirección, intentando por medio de una revisión teórica-conceptual de elementos como la transdisciplina (TD), la autopoiesis y la biología del conocer, establecer las intersecciones que los ligan, y que facultan a esta perspectiva como una cierta oportunidad de configurar una nueva epistemología.
Citas
.
CRONIN, K. (2008). Transdisciplinary research (TDR) and sustainability. Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST) de Nueva Zelanda. https://www.learningforsustainability.net/pubs/Transdisciplinary_Research_and_Sustainability.pdf
EDELENBOS, J., BUUREN, A. y SCHIE, N. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004
GIBBONS, M. TROW, M. SCOTT, P. SCHWARTZMAN, S. NOWONTY, H. LIMOGES, C. (1995). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Contemporary Sociology, 24(6). DOI: 10.2307/2076669
HADORN, G., POHL, C. y BAMMER, G. (2010). Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. In: Frodeman, R., Klein, J., Mitcham, C. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
JANTSCH, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In: Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (Eds.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 97–121.
KLEIN, J. (2015). Reprint of "Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future". Futures, 65, pp. 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.003
LIAROPOULOS, A. (2006) Revolutions in Warfare: Theoretical Paradigms and Historical Evidence-The Napoleonic and First World War Revolutions in Military Affairs. The Journal of Military History 70(2), pp. 363-384. DOI: 10.1353/jmh.2006.0106
LUDICKE, M. (2006). A Theory of Marketing: Outline of a Social Systems Perspective. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag. ISBN=3-8350-0304-6
MINGERS, J. (2002). Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann’s Social Theory. The Sociological Review. 50(2), pp. 278-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00367
NICOLESCU, B. (1996). La Transdisciplinarietè, Manifieste. Editorial Du Rocher. https://basarab-nicolescu.fr/BOOKS/TDRocher.pdf
NOWOTNY, H. Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. In: Audetat, M. Re-Thinking Science, Re-Thinking Society, Social Studies of Science, 31(6), pp. 950–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031006006
PIAGET, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In: Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., y Michaud, G. (Eds.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 127–139.
POHL, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy 11, pp. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.001
POHL, C. Y HADORN, G. (2008). Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sciences Sociétés 16, pp. 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008035
SCHUMACHER, P. (2011). The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for Architecture. Wiley. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
SNYDER, E. (1999). Is Freud's Model of the Mind Autopoietic?, The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 74(1), pp. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00168899909597389
THOMPSON, M., OWEN, S., LINDSAY, J., GRAHAM, S., LEONARD, Y SHANE, J. (2017). Scientist and stakeholder perspectives of transdisciplinary research: Early attitudes, expectations
Derechos de autor 2021 Pablo RIVEROS ARGEL, Juan Carlos LETELIER PARGA, Jaqueline MERIÑO VERGARA, Diego MELLADO ARGEL

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.