Knowing equals doing: a look at the inter and transdisciplinary construction from the Biology of Cognition
Knowing equals doing: a look at the inter and transdisciplinary construction from the Biology of Cognition
Abstract
The progressive complexity of the problems and challenges confronting contemporary societies, demands the need for complex solutions that incorporate analytical frameworks enabling an integral design of what is observed and therefore of what is finally built. In this work the effort goes precisely in that direction, building a theoretical-conceptual revision of elements such as transdiscipline (TD), autopoiesis and Maturana’s Biology of Cognition, to establish the intersections that link them, and empower this perspective as a possible pathway to configure a new action based epistemology.
References
APOSTEL, L. (1972). Terminology and concepts. In: Berger, G. y Michaud, G. Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Center for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Paris
.
CRONIN, K. (2008). Transdisciplinary research (TDR) and sustainability. Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST) de Nueva Zelanda. https://www.learningforsustainability.net/pubs/Transdisciplinary_Research_and_Sustainability.pdf
EDELENBOS, J., BUUREN, A. y SCHIE, N. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004
GIBBONS, M. TROW, M. SCOTT, P. SCHWARTZMAN, S. NOWONTY, H. LIMOGES, C. (1995). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Contemporary Sociology, 24(6). DOI: 10.2307/2076669
HADORN, G., POHL, C. y BAMMER, G. (2010). Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. In: Frodeman, R., Klein, J., Mitcham, C. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
JANTSCH, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In: Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (Eds.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 97–121.
KLEIN, J. (2015). Reprint of "Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future". Futures, 65, pp. 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.003
LIAROPOULOS, A. (2006) Revolutions in Warfare: Theoretical Paradigms and Historical Evidence-The Napoleonic and First World War Revolutions in Military Affairs. The Journal of Military History 70(2), pp. 363-384. DOI: 10.1353/jmh.2006.0106
LUDICKE, M. (2006). A Theory of Marketing: Outline of a Social Systems Perspective. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag. ISBN=3-8350-0304-6
MINGERS, J. (2002). Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann’s Social Theory. The Sociological Review. 50(2), pp. 278-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00367
NICOLESCU, B. (1996). La Transdisciplinarietè, Manifieste. Editorial Du Rocher. https://basarab-nicolescu.fr/BOOKS/TDRocher.pdf
NOWOTNY, H. Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. In: Audetat, M. Re-Thinking Science, Re-Thinking Society, Social Studies of Science, 31(6), pp. 950–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031006006
PIAGET, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In: Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., y Michaud, G. (Eds.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 127–139.
POHL, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy 11, pp. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.001
POHL, C. Y HADORN, G. (2008). Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sciences Sociétés 16, pp. 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008035
SCHUMACHER, P. (2011). The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for Architecture. Wiley. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
SNYDER, E. (1999). Is Freud's Model of the Mind Autopoietic?, The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 74(1), pp. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00168899909597389
THOMPSON, M., OWEN, S., LINDSAY, J., GRAHAM, S., LEONARD, Y SHANE, J. (2017). Scientist and stakeholder perspectives of transdisciplinary research: Early attitudes, expectations
.
CRONIN, K. (2008). Transdisciplinary research (TDR) and sustainability. Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST) de Nueva Zelanda. https://www.learningforsustainability.net/pubs/Transdisciplinary_Research_and_Sustainability.pdf
EDELENBOS, J., BUUREN, A. y SCHIE, N. (2011). Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.004
GIBBONS, M. TROW, M. SCOTT, P. SCHWARTZMAN, S. NOWONTY, H. LIMOGES, C. (1995). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Contemporary Sociology, 24(6). DOI: 10.2307/2076669
HADORN, G., POHL, C. y BAMMER, G. (2010). Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. In: Frodeman, R., Klein, J., Mitcham, C. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
JANTSCH, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In: Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., & Michaud, G. (Eds.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 97–121.
KLEIN, J. (2015). Reprint of "Discourses of transdisciplinarity: Looking back to the future". Futures, 65, pp. 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.003
LIAROPOULOS, A. (2006) Revolutions in Warfare: Theoretical Paradigms and Historical Evidence-The Napoleonic and First World War Revolutions in Military Affairs. The Journal of Military History 70(2), pp. 363-384. DOI: 10.1353/jmh.2006.0106
LUDICKE, M. (2006). A Theory of Marketing: Outline of a Social Systems Perspective. Deutscher Universitats-Verlag. ISBN=3-8350-0304-6
MINGERS, J. (2002). Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann’s Social Theory. The Sociological Review. 50(2), pp. 278-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00367
NICOLESCU, B. (1996). La Transdisciplinarietè, Manifieste. Editorial Du Rocher. https://basarab-nicolescu.fr/BOOKS/TDRocher.pdf
NOWOTNY, H. Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. In: Audetat, M. Re-Thinking Science, Re-Thinking Society, Social Studies of Science, 31(6), pp. 950–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031006006
PIAGET, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In: Apostel, L., Berger, G., Briggs, A., y Michaud, G. (Eds.). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, pp. 127–139.
POHL, C. (2008). From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy 11, pp. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.06.001
POHL, C. Y HADORN, G. (2008). Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sciences Sociétés 16, pp. 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008035
SCHUMACHER, P. (2011). The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for Architecture. Wiley. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
SNYDER, E. (1999). Is Freud's Model of the Mind Autopoietic?, The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 74(1), pp. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00168899909597389
THOMPSON, M., OWEN, S., LINDSAY, J., GRAHAM, S., LEONARD, Y SHANE, J. (2017). Scientist and stakeholder perspectives of transdisciplinary research: Early attitudes, expectations
Published
2021-06-19
How to Cite
RIVEROS ARGEL, P., LETELIER PARGA, J. C., MERIÑO VERGARA, J., & MELLADO ARGEL, D. (2021). Knowing equals doing: a look at the inter and transdisciplinary construction from the Biology of Cognition: Knowing equals doing: a look at the inter and transdisciplinary construction from the Biology of Cognition. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 26(94), 137-146. Retrieved from https://mail.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/utopia/article/view/36115
Section
Artículos
Copyright (c) 2021 Pablo RIVEROS ARGEL, Juan Carlos LETELIER PARGA, Jaqueline MERIÑO VERGARA, Diego MELLADO ARGEL
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
