Legal Regimes for State Property Management. / Regímenes legales para la gestión estatal de la propiedad
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Article deals with administrative-legal mechanism of state property management on example of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Modern science is interested in comparative analysis of approaches to the management of state property in the States under consideration. The criteria of inclusion of objects in the state property formulated based on the existing legal relations allow the author to conclude that the subject of state property management is interested in the possibility of exercising the right of management, which will be the basis for determining such property as the object of such management.
RESUMEN
El artículo trata sobre el mecanismo administrativo-legal de la administración de bienes estatales, por ejemplo, la Federación de Rusia y la República de Belarús. La ciencia moderna está interesada en el análisis comparativo de los enfoques para la administración de la propiedad estatal. Los criterios de inclusión de objetos en la propiedad estatal formulados en base a las relaciones legales existentes permiten a los autores concluir que el sujeto de la administración de la propiedad estatal está interesado en la posibilidad de ejercer el derecho de administración, que será la base para determinar dicha propiedad como objeto de dicha gestión.
References
Brokelind, C. (2016). Intellectual property, taxation and state aid law, in: I. Richelle, W. Schön, E. Traversa, eds. State aid law and business taxation, pp. 221-245, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Damsa, L. (2016). The transformation of property regimes and transitional justice in Central Eastern Europe: In search of a theory. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
De Man, P. (2016). Exclusive Use in an Inclusive Environment. The meaning of the non-appropriation principle for space resource exploitation. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Garde, T.V. (2009). Circumventing the debate over state policy and property rights: Section 3(d) of the Indian patents act law, in: W.P.Z.W. und Pyrmont, M.J. Adelman, R. Brauneis, J. Drexl, R. Nack, eds. Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World: Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus, pp. 243-254, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Guins, G.C. (1957). Soviet law and Soviet society: Ethical foundations of the Soviet structure. Mechanism of the planned economy. Duties and Rights of peasants and workers. Rulers and toilers. The family and the state. Soviet justice. National minorities and their autonomy. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
Huffman, J. (2013). Private property and state power: Philosophical justifications, economic explanations, and the role of government. Palgrave Macmillan US, New York.
Katzarov, K. (1964). Theory of nationalisation. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
Kono, T. (2012). Jurisdiction and applicable law in matters of intellectual property, in: K.B. Brown, D.V. Snyder, eds. General reports of the XVIIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, pp. 393-421, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
Kuprecht, K. (2014). Indigenous peoples’ cultural property claims: Repatriation and beyond. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Lai, J.C. (2014). Indigenous Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property Rights. Learning from the New Zealand Experience? Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Liang, H. (2007). Some opinions and suggestions on the draft of real property law, Frontiers of Law in China, II. 2: pp. 198-223.
Riccardi, L. (2013). Chinese tax law and international treaties. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg.
Tasdelen, A. (2016). The return of cultural artefacts: Hard and soft law approaches. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
