Innovación social desde el emprendimiento social: Panorama de la bibliografía global y colombiana
Palabras clave:
Innovación social, emprendimiento social, revisión de literatura, panorama global, Colombia
Resumen
men
La innovación social genera nuevas soluciones para el logro de Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. Empero, poco se conocen los aportes del emprendimiento a la innovación social en contextos de postconflicto como el colombiano. Así, el objetivo del artículo es mapear la dinámica global de producción académica sobre el tema y los enfoques desde los cuales se ha conceptualizado en Colombia. Para ello, se realizó un estudio descriptivo, con una revisión bibliográfica integral en Scopus. Como resultado, se evidencia un crecimiento mundial de las publicaciones, con significativa participación colombiana. En dicha producción se postula que la conformación de empresa(s) social(es) trasciende al nivel de innovación social mediante el acceso a capital social. Este permitiría conectar políticas y recursos intersectoriales de apoyo al emprendimiento social (aun escasos) con territorios y comunidades excluidas, transformando patrones culturales dominantes. Así, se concluye que el enfoque dominante en el estudio del fenómeno es estructuralista, y que se requiere profundizar en el enfoque baAsado en el agente, mediante la categoría del mindset de empresarios sociales que lideran el tránsito hacia la innovación social.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
• Alonso-Gonzalez, A., Palacios, L. A., y Peris-Ortiz, M. (2018). Sustainable social innovations in smart cities: Exploratory analysis of the current global situation applicable to Colombia. In M. Peris-Ortiz, J. Alonso y P. Marquez (Eds.), Strategies and best practices in social innovation: An institutional perspective (pp. 65-87). Springer.
• Altantsetseg, P., Dadvari, A., Munkhdelger, T., Lkhagvasuren, G-O., y Moslehpour, M. (2020). Sustainable development of entrepreneurial orientation through social drivers. Sustainability, 12(21), 8816. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12218816
• Alvarez, I., Merladet, J., y Núñez-Canal, M. (2021). Social entrepreneurs as role models for innovative professional career developments. Sustainability, 13(23), 13044. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su132313044
• Aria, M., y Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Bajwa, S., Dabral, A., Chatterjee, R., y Shaw, R. (2021). Co-Producing knowledge innovation through thematic incubators for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development in India. Sustainability, 13(4), 2044. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13042044
• Bataglin, J. C., y Kruglianskas, I. (2022). Social innovation: Field analysis and gaps for future research. Sustainability, 14(3), 1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14031153
• Cagarman, K., Kratzer, J., Von Arnim, L. H., Fajga, K., y Gieseke, M. J. (2020). Social entrepreneurship on its way to significance: The case of Germany. Sustainability, 12(21), 8954. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12218954
• Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
• Cantillo, N., Pedraza, C. J., y Suarez, H. (2021). Formación del emprendimiento social: Compromiso de la Universidad de la Guajira en Colombia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(1), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i1.35308
• Cardella, G. M., Hernández-Sánchez, B. R., Monteiro, A. A., y Sánchez-García, J. C. (2021). Social entrepreneurship research: Intellectual structures and future perspectives. Sustainability, 13(14), 7532. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13147532
• Cuéllar-Gálvez, D., Aranda-Camacho, Y., y Mosquera-Vásquez, T. (2018). A model to promote sustainable social change based on the scaling up of a high-impact technical innovation. Sustainability, 10(12), 4532. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124532
• Díez, D. (2022). Aprender a di-sentir. El mindfulness como virtud en la toma de decisiones ética. Centro Editorial Universidad Católica de Manizales.
• Díez, D., Echeverri, A., y Sepúlveda, E. M. (2020). La Revisión Bibliográfica Integral (ReBI) como método transdisciplinar. Su relevancia frente a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS). En C. V. Castaño-Trujillo (Comp.), Aproximaciones académicas a los ODS: ¿Qué significa asegurar la prosperidad para todos? (pp. 11-29). Editorial Corporación Universitaria del Meta - Unimeta.
• Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A., y Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
• Eichler, G. M., y Schwarz, E. J. (2019). What sustainable development goals do social innovations address? A systematic review and content analysis of social innovation literature. Sustainability, 11(2), 522. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11020522
• Feng, G. C. (2015). Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 11(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
• Franco-Leal, N., Camelo-Ordaz, C., Dianez-Gonzalez, J. P., y Sousa-Ginel, E. (2020). The role of social and institutional contexts in social innovations of Spanish academic spinoffs. Sustainability, 12(3), 906. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030906
• García-Jurado, A., Pérez-Barea, J. J., y Nova, R. J. (2021). A new approach to social entrepreneurship: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sustainability, 13(5), 2754. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13052754
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
• Hernández, I., Pérez, C., y Rua, S. (2018). Intereses y perspectivas formativas en economía social y solidaria de los estudiantes universitarios. CIRIEC-España Revista de Economía Pública Social y Cooperativa, (94), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.94.12782
• Jiang, C., Xiao, Y., y Cao, H. (2020). Co-Creating for locality and sustainability: Design-Driven community regeneration strategy in shanghai’s old residential context. Sustainability, 12(7), 2997. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072997
• Kamran, S. M., Khaskhely, M. K., Nassani, A. A., Haffar, M., y Abro, M. M. Q. (2022). Social entrepreneurship opportunities via distant socialization and social value creation. Sustainability, 14(6), 3170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14063170
• Kao, S-W., y Luarn, P. (2020). Topic modeling analysis of social enterprises: Twitter evidence. Sustainability, 12(8), 3419. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12083419
• Kusio, T., Rosiek, J., y Conto, F. (2022). Urban–Rural partnership perspectives in the conceptualization of innovative activities in rural development: On example of three-case study analysis. Sustainability, 14(12), 7309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14127309
• Lang, R., y Fink, M. (2019). Rural social entrepreneurship: The role of social capital within and across institutional levels. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.012
• Londoño, S., y Álvarez, C. M. (2021). Emprendimiento e innovación social: Experiencia de jóvenes rurales en Caldas-Colombia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(E-4), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i.36997
• Lubberink, R., Blok, V., Van Ophem, J., y Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: A systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability, 9(5), 721. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9050721
• Ludvig, A., Rogelja, T., Asamer-Handler, M., Weiss, G., Wilding, M., y Zivojinovic, I. (2020). Governance of social innovation in forestry. Sustainability, 12(3), 1065. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12031065
• Malavera, S. M., Malavera, P. A., y Calle, J. S. (2021). Effects of the orange economy on social entrepreneurship in the city of Medellin. In M. I. Sánchez-Hernández, L. Carvalho, C. Rego, M. R. Lucas y A. Noronha (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the fourth sector: Entrepreneurial ecosystems and sustainable business models (pp. 263-286). Springer.
• Mesía-Montenegro, C. (2021). Innovación social y ciencia ciudadana en la gestión del patrimonio en un escenario post COVID-19. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35938
• Naciones Unidas - NU (2019). Agenda 2030 y los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. NU. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/40155-la-agenda-2030-objetivos-desarrollo-sostenible-oportunidad-america-latina-caribe
• Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Ocampo-Wilches, A. C., y Trujillo-Henao, L. F. (2020). From social entrepreneurship to social innovation: The role of social capital. Study case in Colombian rural communities victim of armed conflict, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 244-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1770317
• Navarro-Valverde, F., Labianca, M., Cejudo-García, E., y De Rubertis, S. (2022). Social innovation in rural areas of the European Union learnings from neo-endogenous development projects in Italy and Spain. Sustainability, 14(11), 6439. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14116439
• Perez-Encinas, A., Bueno, Y., Santos, B., y Nieto-Mejia, C. (2021a). Are there differences and complementarities between senior and young entrepreneurs? An intergenerational perspective. Sustainability, 13(9), 5202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13095202
• Perez-Encinas, A., De Pablo, I., Bueno, Y., y Santos, B. (2021b). Intergenerational entrepreneurship to foster sustainable development: A methodological training proposal. Sustainability, 13(17), 9654. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13179654
• Pol, E., y Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
• Sánchez-Álvarez, C., Boada, C. S., Arévalo, L. D., y López, N. (2022). Emprendimiento Social y Trabajo Social Colombiano. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 19(1), 118-134 https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v19n1a7
• Sinclair, K., Thompson-Colón, T., Bastidas-Granja, A. M., Del Castillo, S. E., Olaya, E., y Melgar-Quiñonez, H. (2022). Women’s autonomy and food security: Connecting the dots from the perspective of indigenous women in rural Colombia. SSM -Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100078
• Strauss, A., y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
• Suriyankietkaew, S., Krittayaruangroj, K., e Iamsawan, N. (2022). Sustainable leadership practices and competencies of SMEs for sustainability and resilience: A community-based social enterprise study. Sustainability, 14(10), 5762. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14105762
• Thoene, U., y Turriago-Hoyos, A. (2017). Financial inclusion in Colombia: A scoping literature review. Intangible Capital, 13(3), 582-614. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.946
• Unceta, A., Guerra, I., y Barandiaran, X. (2021). Integrating Social Innovation into the Curriculum of Higher Education Institutions in Latin America: Insights from the Students4Change project. Sustainability, 13(10), 5378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13105378
• Valenzuela-Zubiaur, M., Torres-Bustos, H., Arroyo-Vázquez, M., y Ferrer-Gisbert, P. (2021). Promotion of social innovation through fab labs. The case of ProteinLab UTEM in Chile. Sustainability, 13(16), 8790. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168790
• Vargas-Merino, J. A. (2021). Innovación social: ¿Nueva cara de la responsabilidad social? conceptualización crítica desde la perspectiva universitaria. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(2), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35934
• Vázquez-Maguirre, M. (2020). Building sustainable rural communities through indigenous social enterprises: A humanistic approach. Sustainability, 12(22), 9643. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229643
• Yang, T-K., y Yan, M-R. (2020). The corporate shared value for sustainable development: An ecosystem perspective. Sustainability, 12(6), 2348. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12062348
• Ziesemer, F., Hüttel, A., y Balderjahn, I. (2019). Pioneers’ insights into governing social innovation for sustainable anti-consumption. Sustainability, 11(23), 6663. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11236663
• Živojinović, I., Ludvig, A., y Hogl, K. (2019). Social innovation to sustain rural communities: Overcoming institutional challenges in Serbia. Sustainability, 11(24), 7248. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11247248
• Altantsetseg, P., Dadvari, A., Munkhdelger, T., Lkhagvasuren, G-O., y Moslehpour, M. (2020). Sustainable development of entrepreneurial orientation through social drivers. Sustainability, 12(21), 8816. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12218816
• Alvarez, I., Merladet, J., y Núñez-Canal, M. (2021). Social entrepreneurs as role models for innovative professional career developments. Sustainability, 13(23), 13044. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su132313044
• Aria, M., y Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Bajwa, S., Dabral, A., Chatterjee, R., y Shaw, R. (2021). Co-Producing knowledge innovation through thematic incubators for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development in India. Sustainability, 13(4), 2044. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13042044
• Bataglin, J. C., y Kruglianskas, I. (2022). Social innovation: Field analysis and gaps for future research. Sustainability, 14(3), 1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14031153
• Cagarman, K., Kratzer, J., Von Arnim, L. H., Fajga, K., y Gieseke, M. J. (2020). Social entrepreneurship on its way to significance: The case of Germany. Sustainability, 12(21), 8954. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12218954
• Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
• Cantillo, N., Pedraza, C. J., y Suarez, H. (2021). Formación del emprendimiento social: Compromiso de la Universidad de la Guajira en Colombia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(1), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i1.35308
• Cardella, G. M., Hernández-Sánchez, B. R., Monteiro, A. A., y Sánchez-García, J. C. (2021). Social entrepreneurship research: Intellectual structures and future perspectives. Sustainability, 13(14), 7532. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13147532
• Cuéllar-Gálvez, D., Aranda-Camacho, Y., y Mosquera-Vásquez, T. (2018). A model to promote sustainable social change based on the scaling up of a high-impact technical innovation. Sustainability, 10(12), 4532. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10124532
• Díez, D. (2022). Aprender a di-sentir. El mindfulness como virtud en la toma de decisiones ética. Centro Editorial Universidad Católica de Manizales.
• Díez, D., Echeverri, A., y Sepúlveda, E. M. (2020). La Revisión Bibliográfica Integral (ReBI) como método transdisciplinar. Su relevancia frente a los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS). En C. V. Castaño-Trujillo (Comp.), Aproximaciones académicas a los ODS: ¿Qué significa asegurar la prosperidad para todos? (pp. 11-29). Editorial Corporación Universitaria del Meta - Unimeta.
• Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A., y Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
• Eichler, G. M., y Schwarz, E. J. (2019). What sustainable development goals do social innovations address? A systematic review and content analysis of social innovation literature. Sustainability, 11(2), 522. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11020522
• Feng, G. C. (2015). Mistakes and how to avoid mistakes in using intercoder reliability indices. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 11(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000086
• Franco-Leal, N., Camelo-Ordaz, C., Dianez-Gonzalez, J. P., y Sousa-Ginel, E. (2020). The role of social and institutional contexts in social innovations of Spanish academic spinoffs. Sustainability, 12(3), 906. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12030906
• García-Jurado, A., Pérez-Barea, J. J., y Nova, R. J. (2021). A new approach to social entrepreneurship: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sustainability, 13(5), 2754. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13052754
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
• Hernández, I., Pérez, C., y Rua, S. (2018). Intereses y perspectivas formativas en economía social y solidaria de los estudiantes universitarios. CIRIEC-España Revista de Economía Pública Social y Cooperativa, (94), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.94.12782
• Jiang, C., Xiao, Y., y Cao, H. (2020). Co-Creating for locality and sustainability: Design-Driven community regeneration strategy in shanghai’s old residential context. Sustainability, 12(7), 2997. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072997
• Kamran, S. M., Khaskhely, M. K., Nassani, A. A., Haffar, M., y Abro, M. M. Q. (2022). Social entrepreneurship opportunities via distant socialization and social value creation. Sustainability, 14(6), 3170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14063170
• Kao, S-W., y Luarn, P. (2020). Topic modeling analysis of social enterprises: Twitter evidence. Sustainability, 12(8), 3419. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12083419
• Kusio, T., Rosiek, J., y Conto, F. (2022). Urban–Rural partnership perspectives in the conceptualization of innovative activities in rural development: On example of three-case study analysis. Sustainability, 14(12), 7309. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14127309
• Lang, R., y Fink, M. (2019). Rural social entrepreneurship: The role of social capital within and across institutional levels. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.012
• Londoño, S., y Álvarez, C. M. (2021). Emprendimiento e innovación social: Experiencia de jóvenes rurales en Caldas-Colombia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(E-4), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i.36997
• Lubberink, R., Blok, V., Van Ophem, J., y Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for responsible innovation in the business context: A systematic literature review of responsible, social and sustainable innovation practices. Sustainability, 9(5), 721. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9050721
• Ludvig, A., Rogelja, T., Asamer-Handler, M., Weiss, G., Wilding, M., y Zivojinovic, I. (2020). Governance of social innovation in forestry. Sustainability, 12(3), 1065. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12031065
• Malavera, S. M., Malavera, P. A., y Calle, J. S. (2021). Effects of the orange economy on social entrepreneurship in the city of Medellin. In M. I. Sánchez-Hernández, L. Carvalho, C. Rego, M. R. Lucas y A. Noronha (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in the fourth sector: Entrepreneurial ecosystems and sustainable business models (pp. 263-286). Springer.
• Mesía-Montenegro, C. (2021). Innovación social y ciencia ciudadana en la gestión del patrimonio en un escenario post COVID-19. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(2), 13-17. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35938
• Naciones Unidas - NU (2019). Agenda 2030 y los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Una oportunidad para América Latina y el Caribe. NU. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/40155-la-agenda-2030-objetivos-desarrollo-sostenible-oportunidad-america-latina-caribe
• Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Ocampo-Wilches, A. C., y Trujillo-Henao, L. F. (2020). From social entrepreneurship to social innovation: The role of social capital. Study case in Colombian rural communities victim of armed conflict, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 244-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1770317
• Navarro-Valverde, F., Labianca, M., Cejudo-García, E., y De Rubertis, S. (2022). Social innovation in rural areas of the European Union learnings from neo-endogenous development projects in Italy and Spain. Sustainability, 14(11), 6439. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14116439
• Perez-Encinas, A., Bueno, Y., Santos, B., y Nieto-Mejia, C. (2021a). Are there differences and complementarities between senior and young entrepreneurs? An intergenerational perspective. Sustainability, 13(9), 5202. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13095202
• Perez-Encinas, A., De Pablo, I., Bueno, Y., y Santos, B. (2021b). Intergenerational entrepreneurship to foster sustainable development: A methodological training proposal. Sustainability, 13(17), 9654. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13179654
• Pol, E., y Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
• Sánchez-Álvarez, C., Boada, C. S., Arévalo, L. D., y López, N. (2022). Emprendimiento Social y Trabajo Social Colombiano. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 19(1), 118-134 https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v19n1a7
• Sinclair, K., Thompson-Colón, T., Bastidas-Granja, A. M., Del Castillo, S. E., Olaya, E., y Melgar-Quiñonez, H. (2022). Women’s autonomy and food security: Connecting the dots from the perspective of indigenous women in rural Colombia. SSM -Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100078
• Strauss, A., y Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.
• Suriyankietkaew, S., Krittayaruangroj, K., e Iamsawan, N. (2022). Sustainable leadership practices and competencies of SMEs for sustainability and resilience: A community-based social enterprise study. Sustainability, 14(10), 5762. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14105762
• Thoene, U., y Turriago-Hoyos, A. (2017). Financial inclusion in Colombia: A scoping literature review. Intangible Capital, 13(3), 582-614. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.946
• Unceta, A., Guerra, I., y Barandiaran, X. (2021). Integrating Social Innovation into the Curriculum of Higher Education Institutions in Latin America: Insights from the Students4Change project. Sustainability, 13(10), 5378. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13105378
• Valenzuela-Zubiaur, M., Torres-Bustos, H., Arroyo-Vázquez, M., y Ferrer-Gisbert, P. (2021). Promotion of social innovation through fab labs. The case of ProteinLab UTEM in Chile. Sustainability, 13(16), 8790. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168790
• Vargas-Merino, J. A. (2021). Innovación social: ¿Nueva cara de la responsabilidad social? conceptualización crítica desde la perspectiva universitaria. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), XXVII(2), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v27i2.35934
• Vázquez-Maguirre, M. (2020). Building sustainable rural communities through indigenous social enterprises: A humanistic approach. Sustainability, 12(22), 9643. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12229643
• Yang, T-K., y Yan, M-R. (2020). The corporate shared value for sustainable development: An ecosystem perspective. Sustainability, 12(6), 2348. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12062348
• Ziesemer, F., Hüttel, A., y Balderjahn, I. (2019). Pioneers’ insights into governing social innovation for sustainable anti-consumption. Sustainability, 11(23), 6663. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11236663
• Živojinović, I., Ludvig, A., y Hogl, K. (2019). Social innovation to sustain rural communities: Overcoming institutional challenges in Serbia. Sustainability, 11(24), 7248. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11247248
Publicado
2023-04-19
Cómo citar
Díez, D., Flórez, L., & Arboleda, C. (2023). Innovación social desde el emprendimiento social: Panorama de la bibliografía global y colombiana. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 29(2), 277-296. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i2.39976
Número
Sección
Artículos
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
1.jpg)
1.jpg)
