Diseño y validación de una escala de satisfacción sobre las prácticas de gestión del talento humano

Development and validation of a scale for assessing satisfaction with human talent management practices

  • Santiago Ludeña Universidad Nacional de Loja
Keywords: satisfaction with human talent practices, human talent management, construct validity, exploratory factor analysis

Abstract

This study designed and validated the Human Talent Management Satisfaction Scale (ESGTH), a 24-item instrument structured into six dimensions according to Chiavenato's model (2020): integrating, engaging, utilizing, rewarding, developing, and monitoring talent. Applied to 148 employees, the scale demonstrated excellent psychometric properties; content validity was supported by a Dimensional Concordance Index ≥ 0.80 on all items; exploratory factor analysis confirmed the theoretical structure of six factors, with factor loadings > 0.75, no cross-interference, and an explained variance of 70.25%. Reliability was exceptional: overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.96 and values per dimension between 0.89 and 0.94. These results position
the ESGTH as a valid, reliable, and useful tool for measuring employee satisfaction with specific talent management practices, overcoming the limitations of generic climate or job satisfaction scales. Its application enables accurate diagnostics of management processes such as selection, compensation, and training, optimizing organizational effectiveness, and guides evidence-based strategic interventions in human resources, facilitating strategic alignment and management decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Santiago Ludeña, Universidad Nacional de Loja

Ingeniero Comercial; Máster en Planificación y Prospectiva Multisectorial; Máster en Desarrollo Comunitario; participante del doctorado en Administración de empresas en la Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Docente investigador en la carrera de Administración de Empresas de la Universidad Nacional de Loja, Ecuador.

References

Alfes, K., Shantz, A. & Bailey, C. (2016). Enhancing Volunteer Engagement to Achieve Desirable Outcomes: What Can Non-profit Employers Do? Voluntas (27), 595–617 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9601-3

American Educational Research Association [AERA]. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Arias, I., Guerrero, K., Orozco, W., Castro, G. & Caminos, W. (2023). La gestión del talento humano como un aporte fundamental para el desarrollo de las empresas. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i2.867

Boselie, P. Dietz, G. & Boon, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00139.x

Burbano, J., Campí, C. & Garcés, C. (2022). Implicaciones de la gerencia de los recursos humanos en la gestión administrativa. Reciamuc, 6(3), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.26820/reciamuc/6.(3).julio.2022.166-175

Chiavenato, I. (2020). Gestión del talento humano. (5ta. ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Chicaiza, E., Salazar, C., & Chávez, H. (2023). Gestión del talento humano y el desempeño laboral. caso de estudio “Lácteos Maribella”. Religación Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 8(35), https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v8i35.1002

Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj14868

Criollo, A., Campoverde, C., Castillo, J., & Herrera, W. (2023). Estrategias para valoración de la calidad del talento humano. Technology Rain Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55204/trj.v2i1.9

DeVellis, R. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R (1st ed.). Sage Publications.

Gaspar-Castro, M. (2021). La gestión de talento humano y su influencia en el desempeño laboral para el éxito de las empresas. Polo del conocimiento, 6(8), 318-329. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8042592.pdf

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.

Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139

Haynes, S., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238

International Test Commission. (2018). International guidelines for test use. https://www.intestcom.org
Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Litwin, G. & Stringer, R. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Harvard Business School Press.
Llaure, E. (2025). La recompensa y satisfacción laboral en contextos organizacionales: Una revisión sistemática. ARANDU UTIC,12(1), 3327-3351. https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v12i1.810

Medina-Rivera, Z., Santiago-Ortega, R., & Castro-Gonzáles, S. (2023). Permanecer o no en la empresa. Fórum Empresarial, 28(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.33801/fe.v28i1.21208

Montero, I. & León, O. (2002). Clasificación y descripción de las metodologías de investigación en Psicología. Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, 2(3), 503-508. https://www.aepc.es/ijchp/articulos_pdf/ijchp-53.pdf

Mora, O., Guerrero, M., Manosalvas, C. & Pedraza, M. (2022). Satisfacción laboral y engagement de trabajadores de empresas peruanas y ecuatorianas. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(Especial 8), 956-974. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.8.15

Noriega, C. & Farfán, J. (2024). Planeación estratégica en la gestión del talento humano en una organización empresarial: un estudio de caso. Religación Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 9(39). https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v9i39.1170

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual (7th ed.). Routledge.

Romero, A., Jiménez, G., & Salguero, N. (2024). Post Pandemia: Plan de Fortalecimiento del Capital Humano para Entidades Públicas de COTOPAXI. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(6), 7888-7902. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i6.9319

Salazar, F., Pesantez, W., Cortázar, M. & Sánchez, P. (2023). El talento humano y la ventaja competitiva de las organizaciones. Revista Enfoques, 7(26), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaenfoques.v7i26.163

Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248

Spector, P. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Sage Publications.

Sun, L., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525821

Weiss, D., Dawis, R., England, G., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. University of Minnesota.
Published
2026-04-02
How to Cite
Ludeña, S. (2026). Diseño y validación de una escala de satisfacción sobre las prácticas de gestión del talento humano: Development and validation of a scale for assessing satisfaction with human talent management practices. Impacto Científico, 21(Extraordinario), 29-49. Retrieved from http://mail.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/impacto/article/view/45416