Sócrates y Heidegger
Socrates and Heidegger
Abstract
It suggests that Heidegger’s method is able to be coordinated to a certain degree with Socrates’ philosophy. Heidegger considers the formal-ontological structures of worldly life through a phenomenological analysis and Socrates problematizes the best way to live in order to lead to his interlocutors under the criterion by which to see the things is necessary to keep in view the being. Nevertheless, in both cases it deals with a questioning way of being, whose fruit it is not the outcome of a process of interpretation, but the very exercise of the interpretation.
Downloads
References
HEIDEGGER, Martin. Gesamtausgabe 8, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 2002, pp. 19-20.
VLASTOS, Gregory. Socrates. Ironist and moral philosopher, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
John Burnet, Opera Platonica, Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1900-1907.
GONZÁLEZ, Francisco. Plato and Heidegger, The Pennsylvania University Press, Pennsylvania, 2019
DOSTAL, Robert. “Beyond Being: Heidegger’s Plato”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 23(1), 1985, pp. 71-98
ROSEN, Stanley. The Question of Being. A Reversal of Heidegger. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1993
KIM, Alan. Plato in Germany. Kant, Natorp, Heidegger. Academia, Germany, 2010, pp. 230-286
PARTENIE, Catalin & ROCKMORE, Tom (Eds.). Heidegger and Plato, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois, 2005
SALLIS, John. The Verge of Philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2008, pp. 11-28.
ADRIÁN, Jesús. “El joven Heidegger y los presupuestos metodológicos de la fenomenología hermenéutica, Themata, 44, 2011, pp. 213-238.
GONZÁLEZ, Francisco. “The Socratic hermeneutics of Heidegger and Gadamer”, en A companion to Socrates, S. Rappe & K. Rachana (Eds.). Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom, 2009, pp. 241-246
MAGRINI, James. “Heidegger’s Socrates. “Pure Thinking” on Method, Truth, and Learning”, Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 2019, pp. 127-145
HYLAND, Drew. Finitude and Trascendence in the Platonic Dialogues, University of New York Press, Albany, 1995, p. 17.
ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica, versión trilingüe de Valentín García Yebra, Gredos, Madrid, 1998, 1078b17-23.
GONZÁLEZ, Francisco “Non-propositional knowledge in Plato”, Apeiron, 31, 1998, pp. 235-284.
LANDMANN, Michael. “Socrates as a precursor of Phenomenology”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2(1), 1941, pp. 15-42.
KIRKLAND, Sean. The Ontology of Socratic Questioning in Plato’s Early Dialogues, State University of New York Press, Albany, 2012.
LIDDELL, Henry & SCOTT, Robert. A Greek-English Lexicon, New Supplement Added, Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996, p. 107
DE LARA, Francisco. “Los modelos de análisis fenomenológico del joven Heidegger. Una discusión sobre el lugar político de la filosofía”, Pensamiento, 18(281), 2018, p. 613.
CLERK SHAW, J. “Punishment and Psychology in Plato’s Gorgias”, Polis, 32, 2015, pp. 75-95.
DE LARA, Francisco. “Fenomenología y dialéctica. La crítica de Heidegger a la dialéctica”, en Martin Heidegger. La experiencia del camino, Alfredo Rocha de la Torre (Ed.), Ediciones Uninorte, Barranquilla, Colombia, 2009, pp. 95-123
GONZÁLEZ, Francisco. “Dialectic as Philosophical Embarrassment”: Heidegger’s Critique of Plato’s Method”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40(3), pp. 361-389
BIEMEL, Walter & SANER, Hans (Eds.). Martin Heidegger/Karl Jaspers. Correspondencia (1920-1963), traducción de Juan José García Norro, Editorial Síntesis, Madrid, 2003, pp. 144-146
DE LARA, Francisco, “La autocancelación de la filosofía en el joven Heidegger”, en Heidegger hoy. Estudios y Perspectivas, Alfredo Rocha de la Torre (Ed.), Grama ediciones, Buenos Aires, 2011, p. 437.
GONZALEZ, Francisco. “And the Rest Is Sigetik: Silencing Logic and Dialectic in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie”. Research in Phenomenology, 38, 2008, pp. 358-391
